Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Sprint to Soft-Launch Xohm on Tuesday » Looking to the Future
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
223
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
So »
AuthorAll Replies


texans20
Weapons of Masturbation
Premium
join:2002-09-28
Texas!
clubs:

Looking to the Future

So many companies are only worried about the next quarter's numbers, never looking beyond to the long term (hi, AT&T!). I'm not a big Sprint fan, but I believe this will pay off for them huge in the future. Wireless in laptops is now as standard as USB ports, and more gadgets are getting wireless from gaming systems to MP3 players.

Not to mention, it gives home users a viable alternative to their DSL/Cable ISP and increases competition which is great for everyone. Once Xohm is available in my area, I'll take a look to see if I can dump Road Runner.
--
"I sincerely believe the banking institutions having the issuing power of money are more dangerous to liberty than standing armies." Thomas Jefferson

patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

said by texans20 See Profile :

Not to mention, it gives home users a viable alternative to their DSL/Cable ISP and increases competition which is great for everyone. Once Xohm is available in my area, I'll take a look to see if I can dump Road Runner.
No way in hell unless they have cell density of Richchet, and each cell has its own bandwidth alotment (each one is wired, or wireless backhaul on another frequency band). A cable Fiber Node serves/passes a couple hundred houses at most, which i would say is a 3-6 block radius. And each one gives 40Mbps. Cellphone towers have a 10-30 block radius, and often have lower bandwidth to them. Remember Wimax will never run at the 100mbit. There will be multiple users, and Sprint can't afford to run multiple T3s to each tower. Cell phone systems have a much higher contention ratio. I expect Wimax to be the same. Wimax probably does gain efficency through have less packet/cell/circuit overhead than with Cellular technology.


ureihcim
Freshly made

join:2007-12-16
Miami, FL

Which is why Backhaul can be used too increase overall bandwidth too each tower without running up the cost of running a line of fiber too every tower but just a few, and towers that have less usage is still being used by a tower 10 miles away connected through a backhaul where usage is actually high.
Forums » Sprint to Soft-Launch Xohm on TuesdaySo »


Tuesday, 01-Dec 12:00:13 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [62] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [53] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [38] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [37] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [33] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
· [31] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [24] Midcontinent Socked With Easement Lawsuit
· [12] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [12] Vivendi Agrees, Comcast/NBC Deal Soon
· [5] Telco Exec Gets Broadband In Market Snubbed For Years
Most people now reading
· Heating - my dad gave me this advice... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Is Microsoft Technet ok to use for my family PC's? [Microsoft Help]
· Data Usage Meter Launched [Comcast HSI]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· buying a one way ticket [General Questions]
· [Rant] called out sick! [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· Prevx says MS Nov 10 patches causing BSOD problems [Security]
· [News] Windows 8 Release 2012? [Microsoft Help]
· Considering Leaving Vonage, who should I Consider? [VOIP Tech Chat]