Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » World's Ten Largest IPTV Providers » Cue the "USA Sucks" Whining!
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Anyone know?  
AuthorAll Replies

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

reply to KrK
Re: Cue the "USA Sucks" Whining!

But it is about having to live like the French, because you don't get to have your cake and eat it too. I would love to have everything that I have now and pay a 1/3 of the cost for my televion, ISP, and voice, but that's not the world we live in. If somebody comes up with a plan to make that a reality, then I'm all for it.


KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service
·Cox HSI
·AT&T Southwest


1 edit
The idea is competition. The French encouraged and the Government backed up local loop unbundling which opened the door for competition. That competition was originally riding the existing Telco lines, but as they got their footing, they began building out their own networks and fiber and now you have the result --- modern, competing telecommunications services resulting in more options and lower prices.

WE were OH so close here.... We started down that path... and providers were starting to buildout their own networks... but our Government backed off protecting the fledglings from the ravages of the ILEC's and gave up on local loop unbundling-- that, combined with the dot com crash, and boom all the startups (A few barely hanging on, IE Covad) went under, and we reap the rewards today-- only a few choices, no options, and high prices.

It's sad. With just a little more leadership from the Administration and the FCC we'd be right where the French are now-- hell, we'd be better off, IMHO because we started first and because we have many content producers here.

Oh so close... but we dropped the ball.

We could have it, down the road, but it requires action and leadership now.... and it would require forcing the existing players, at least for a time, to allow access to their networks... and you know they'd fight that every step of the way... but if the Government or FCC held firm, down the road, say 10 years, the payoff would be clear--- competition. Choices. State of the art networks. Sadly, I think it's very unlikely to happen... no matter which party is in control.
Forums » World's Ten Largest IPTV Providers« Anyone know?  


Friday, 04-Dec 06:47:27 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [142] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [103] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [85] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [66] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [64] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [63] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [ PVP] 3.2 DK PvP D/W Spec... [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· [Business] how to bridge a smc 8014 business class modem [Comcast HSI]
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· What is the spell hit cap for a lvl 80 full arcane spec mage [World of Warcraft]
· [Rant] Disrespect of PTO [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· [TWC] Audio/Video outage in Brooklyn [Time Warner Cable TV/Voice]
· Am I the only one that loves to work in IT? [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]