milbrath
join:2006-03-27
Dresden, TN | reply to LLigetfa
Re: [Fixed] Help with my new WISP
Those are 17db M2 Yagi's. Must be a difficult shot. I'd be curious as to what your RSSI & Jitter Levels are. Ofcourse you'd have to ask your Wisp that.
BM |
|
AMD Phreak
Premium
join:2003-12-14
| said by milbrath  :Those are 17db M2 Yagi's. Must be a difficult shot. I'd be curious as to what your RSSI & Jitter Levels are. Ofcourse you'd have to ask your Wisp that. BM Indeed. OP can you maybe have the WISP provide you with power level (dB) and jitter of your links? RSSI on the Canopy system is nice, but I have found that it is a value that is less important compared to the dB levels.
--
"No job is so important, and no service is so urgent that we cannot take the time to do it safely."
-- AT&T
--Safety One Tower Rescue Certified
--LLigetfa:"Wimax is like teenage sex. Everyone talks about doing it." |
|
LLigetfa
join:2006-05-15
Fort Frances, ON
| reply to milbrath
said by milbrath :Ofcourse you'd have to ask your Wisp that. If they didn't lock the R/O access to the SM, it may be available via IP 169.254.1.1.
--
Strange as it seems, no amount of learning can cure stupidity, and formal education positively fortifies it. -- Stephen Vizinczey |
|
milbrath
join:2006-03-27
Dresden, TN
| reply to AMD Phreak
Well I posted that bit of info before I looked at his ping plotter results, looks like it's 900 Canopy Software Scheduling(30ms to first hop? hardware would be ~14ms or so). As was stated it appears they use sprint for their backbone and looks like the problem is on sprints side as ping plotter looks pretty good until a few hops within the sprint network.
And yes I said RSSI, but I meant DB. RSSI levels on canopy are completely WORTHLESS. No consistency whatsoever in relation to raw signal strength.
BM |
|
AMD Phreak
Premium
join:2003-12-14 | Depends on where the first hop is.
True there is lower latency with HW scheduling vs SW, the 30ms could still be HW scheduling with the added latency of a BHM-BHS setup. |
|
