Chair
join:2002-04-08
San Francisco, CA
clubs:
 ·DSL EXTREME
| reply to Chris 313
Re: Should've already been there...
lol, did you read the original post? Outlook would have PREVENTED most of the important data to be lost...
The data that was lost was on their servers, not yours. If you used outlook, data loss would only be on the emails during the last update, which for me is 5 minutes. |
|
Cheese
Premium
join:2003-10-26
Naples, FL
clubs:
| said by Chair  :lol, did you read the original post? Outlook would have PREVENTED most of the important data to be lost... The data that was lost was on their servers, not yours. If you used outlook, data loss would only be on the emails during the last update, which for me is 5 minutes. No, it wouldn't have, not if the user hadn't opened up OUTLOOK to download those emails. If they hadn't they are out of luck. |
|
BIGHUSKER
join:2002-01-20
Minneapolis, MN
| Uhm, did you even read what you replied to? The guy the only loss would have been on e-mails since the last update/download, which is exactly what you're referring to.
This is a primary reason why I don't use webmail. Everything is download to Thunderbird and backed up accordingly. My client is also set to check for e-mail every minute and my PC is generally on 24x7. |
|
