 Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium join:2002-03-03 USA kudos:4 | reply to sporkme
Re: Bob Sullivan - another left wing reporter said by sporkme:I'm not just going to trust the "internets" and my home lines do not have an "account manager". Thanks for confirming that this is indeed a scam and that VZ does not publish what the actual price is. I confirmed no such thing. I haven't looked thru their web site to find if fees are there, so I couldn't say whether they are there or not. -- Internet News My BLOG My Web Page |
|
 | said by Romney2012:I confirmed no such thing. I haven't looked thru (sic) their web site to find if fees are there, so I couldn't say whether they are there or not. Then why did you say this:
said by Romney2012:Fee information is available from many sources - not just their web site. |
|
|
|
 sporkmedrop the crantini and move it, sisterPremium,MVM join:2000-07-01 Morristown, NJ Reviews:
·Optimum Online
| said by moonpuppy:said by Romney2012:I confirmed no such thing. I haven't looked thru (sic) their web site to find if fees are there, so I couldn't say whether they are there or not. Then why did you say this: said by Romney2012:Fee information is available from many sources - not just their web site. I still say TK is a retired VZ/Bell Atlantic guy.  |
|
 Romney2012Defeat Obama 2012-Chg we can believe inPremium join:2002-03-03 USA kudos:4 | said by sporkme:I still say TK is a retired VZ/Bell Atlantic guy. Wrong. I'm a retired railroad exec. -- Internet News My BLOG My Web Page |
|
 RickezGoinginsane join:2000-09-02 Three Rivers, MA | Wrong. I'm a retired railroad exec. = Thats even worse.... Amtrak? even worse! -- Got a one way ticket, going the wrong way.... |
|
 KrKHeavy Artillery For The Little GuyPremium join:2000-01-17 Tulsa, OK Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service
| reply to Romney2012 said by Romney2012:Wrong. I'm a retired railroad exec. Back in the day, I believe they called such a person a Robber Baron.  |
|
 fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium join:2005-05-20 kudos:3 | reply to Romney2012 While I agree with you, strongly, on your take here - as I often do.. the one thing that I would like to see happen is simple..
Taxes are taxes - those that are paid to the government. Everything else is and should be the actual cost of the service or product.
I for one would like to see a truth in ... X act set up.
If there is a fee that is part of every customer's bill in order to provide the service, then it should be in fact part of the monthly price, and not broken out as a 'fee'..
IE: If there is a "global connection charge" at $2.00, and the base internet price is $29.99, then the real price of the internet service SHOULD be $31.99 because that $2.00 'fee' is an actual cost to deliver the service.
On some levels, I agree with the arguments about the fees. In my opinion, take the grocery store and the produce department (and assume there was tax on it).. if they were to say that a cucumber was $0.49 cents each, + tax + $0.30 cent refrigeration fee, the cost to keep it cold is in fact part of the cost of the product.
Basically, what I'm saying is that I have to agree on "fees", those that are not taxes. I agree that a tax needs to be broken out as it should.. but if it's a fee, ie: part of putting the product out, then it should be part of the price and not broken out.
If they were to break out costs, then I'd love to see them break out the actual line item costs.. CSR, outside tech, inside tech, power, insurance, etc. 
I just think that if it's not a tax, then it's part of the product. What say you? |
|