Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T U-verse » DL/UL speeds accurate or understated?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Just ordered 10/1.5 »
« New interactive features?  
AuthorAll Replies

Frohike
Premium
join:2000-07-23
Waxahachie, TX

reply to John H
Re: DL/UL speeds accurate or understated?

said by John H :

Speeds are overstated, meaning if you order 3/! you will almost 100% not get 3MB/1MB, but somewhat close.
In Uverse - they aren't overstated. Uverse doesn't use same ATM technology that DSL uses. I have Uverse 3m/1m and I get 2900ish Down and 900ish upload no matter the time of day.

austai

join:2008-02-06
Austin, TX

said by Frohike See Profile :

In Uverse - they aren't overstated. Uverse doesn't use same ATM technology that DSL uses. I have Uverse 3m/1m and I get 2900ish Down and 900ish upload no matter the time of day.
Yes, but now that they have fiber to my neighborhood, and the bandwidth from that node to my house is supposedly much higher, it seems the internet access can be much higher, too, if AT&T wanted.

I'm going to let them install the u-verse service and then cancel all of it unless they can give me the internet portion for less than what I'm paying for cable now.

This is assuming the u-verse internet part is more reliable than my cable access.

Frohike
Premium
join:2000-07-23
Waxahachie, TX


1 edit
said by austai See Profile :

said by Frohike See Profile :

In Uverse - they aren't overstated. Uverse doesn't use same ATM technology that DSL uses. I have Uverse 3m/1m and I get 2900ish Down and 900ish upload no matter the time of day.
Yes, but now that they have fiber to my neighborhood, and the bandwidth from that node to my house is supposedly much higher, it seems the internet access can be much higher, too, if AT&T wanted.

I'm going to let them install the u-verse service and then cancel all of it unless they can give me the internet portion for less than what I'm paying for cable now.

This is assuming the u-verse internet part is more reliable than my cable access.
I was just replying to John's post. If you can get higher speed at a cheaper rate...more power to ya. =)

Just when I had cable..at peak times - my speeds were very diminished - usually at a 1/3 of the max... rejoiced the day DSL was available (no more peak time issues) even happier when Uverse was available.
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T U-verseJust ordered 10/1.5 »
« New interactive features?  


Thursday, 10-Dec 21:59:35 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [200] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [136] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [87] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [82] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [75] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [55] Average American Consumes 34 Gigabytes Daily
· [51] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [51] AT&T: iPhone Data Pricing Comments 'Taken Out Of Context'
Most people now reading
· New Mediacom Email [Mediacom]
· [WIN7] Well, I was dumb, but do I have recourse? [Microsoft Help]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· ICC strats [World of Warcraft]
· 60GB would only last us two days! [TekSavvy]
· malware has been found hidden inside an Ubuntu screensaver [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]