republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Comcast Takes The Lead On DOCSIS 3.0 » Where are the...
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Hmmm  
AuthorAll Replies

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

reply to SilverSurfer
Re: Where are the...

You only need to worry about alleged caps/restrictions if you want to abuse the system 24/7. There are plenty of users that will be ecstatic about upgraded throughput tiers that won't have any problems with caps/restrictions that Comcast places on their network.


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02

Host:
Road Runner
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech
quote:
You only need to worry about alleged caps/restrictions if you want to abuse the system 24/7
Technically Comcast's traffic shaping throttles upstream p2p traffic for all users regardless of consumption.


fuziwuzi
Not born yesterday
Premium
join:2005-07-01
Atlanta, GA

reply to openbox9
said by openbox9 See Profile :

You only need to worry about alleged caps/restrictions if you want to abuse the system 24/7. There are plenty of users that will be ecstatic about upgraded throughput tiers that won't have any problems with caps/restrictions that Comcast places on their network.
How fast of a connection do you need if all you feel safe doing is sending an email to your grandma with a couple of pictures of the kids attached? Oops, don't attach too many pictures and heaven forbid you send a video clip, you might be accused of "abuse" and have your service terminated.

If having that awesome 50Mbps connection can't get you the stuff you want at awesome speed, but instead you're still limited to casual web browsing and sending/receiving a few emails, then what use is that 50Mbps connection when a 1Mbps connection would do that same thing with no noticeable difference?

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
reply to Karl Bode
Ok. You only need to worry about caps and P2P restrictions if you want to abuse the system 24/7 and seed files via P2P.

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

reply to fuziwuzi
How about quickly handling Microsoft's patch Tuesday? How about purchasing all of those mp3/mp4 files from Amazon or iTunes? How about Apple's new HD aTV rental mechanism? How about downloading all of those hi-rez pictures and video clips from your grandchildrens' website? Anyway, you get my point.


hopeflicker
Capitalism breeds greed
Premium
join:2003-04-03
Long Beach, CA
How are people supposed to download those hirez pix/vids of their grandkids if you cant upload these large files.
--
Man created God in his image : intolerant, sexist, homophobic and violent.

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
Why can't you upload?

Thaler
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA

reply to openbox9
said by openbox9 See Profile :

Ok. You only need to worry about caps and P2P restrictions if you want to abuse the system 24/7 and seed files via P2P.
I wasn't aware Skype, OpenOffice, and Linux distros fell into the range of "ISP abuse". Thanks for clearing that up!

Thaler
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA

reply to openbox9
said by openbox9 See Profile :

How about quickly handling Microsoft's patch Tuesday?
How quick do you really need them? You only need a basic broadband connection to be set for "first day downloads". Wether or not you're running the first patches from "patch Tuesday" within the first 20 minutes of release means *nothing*.

said by openbox9 See Profile :

How about purchasing all of those mp3/mp4 files from Amazon or iTunes?
What, people on 1.5M connections can't use Amazon or iTunes?

said by openbox9 See Profile :

How about Apple's new HD aTV rental mechanism?
I'd imagine it streams well enough over slower "standard" broadband connections.

etc., etc. Again, your average "surfing" grannie isn't going to benefit didly squat from a massive pipe connection. It caters more to those who're going to use the internet for lots of large file transfers - the exact same users Comcast labels as "abusive" once they hit the invisible bandwidth cap.


knightmb
Everybody Lies

join:2003-12-01
Franklin, TN
·AT&T DSL Service

reply to Karl Bode
said by Karl Bode See Profile :

quote:
You only need to worry about alleged caps/restrictions if you want to abuse the system 24/7
Technically Comcast's traffic shaping throttles upstream p2p traffic for all users regardless of consumption.
Except for business customers I believe. Correct me if I'm wrong, but if I can turn lose my BT and keep a 24/7 max upload all week then one would assume either I'm the only person in my city with Comcast (unlikely) or they are only doing this to residential customers and not business customers.

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
reply to Thaler
Is it that easy for you to put words in my mouth? Where did I say that Skype, OpenOffice, or Linux were "ISP abuse"?

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

reply to Thaler
said by Thaler See Profile :

How quick do you really need them?
Reading the posts in this forum, you'd think you need them as quick as possible. Isn't that one of the big arguments for having "fat pipes" into homes?
said by Thaler See Profile :

What, people on 1.5M connections can't use Amazon or iTunes?
Of course they can. People with 1.5 Mbps connections can do almost anything they want on the 'net. See my previous point...besides, I'm not the one begging for 50 Mbps connections that I won't use.
said by Thaler See Profile :

I'd imagine it streams well enough over slower "standard" broadband connections.
Most streams will work fine after a buffering period.
said by Thaler See Profile :

It caters more to those who're going to use the internet for lots of large file transfers - the exact same users Comcast labels as "abusive" once they hit the invisible bandwidth cap.
Give me examples of routine, legitimate large file transfers that will be considered abusive.

Thaler
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA

said by openbox9 See Profile :

Give me examples of routine, legitimate large file transfers that will be considered abusive.
Music, Video, Patches, Software, files, distros, etc.

All those uses are legitimate, and the use/files will begin to add up in terms of GB/month. That's just the thing about bandwidth caps. Any user can it hit, and they can do so downloading legally OR illegaly - it doesn't discriminate for or against file legitimacy.

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

You posted previously that a 1.5 Mbps is more than capable of downloading music, videos, patches, etc. You're playing both sides of the discussion. My point is that more throughput is useful regardless of caps and other restrictions. Normal users don't download/upload 24/7 and therefore more likely won't be affected, i.e. downloading legal music, video, software patches, Linux distros, etc.


fuziwuzi
Not born yesterday
Premium
join:2005-07-01
Atlanta, GA

reply to openbox9
said by openbox9 See Profile :

How about quickly handling Microsoft's patch Tuesday? How about purchasing all of those mp3/mp4 files from Amazon or iTunes? How about Apple's new HD aTV rental mechanism? How about downloading all of those hi-rez pictures and video clips from your grandchildrens' website? Anyway, you get my point.
You miss the point. Download too much of Apple's HD content and you get hit with the "abuse" label and your account is terminated. Download too many mp3/mp4 files from Amazon or iTunes, you get terminated. And how do you UPLOAD those hi-rez pictures and video clips for grandma to download if your account gets terminated because you are labeled an abuser for using it to upload those pictures and video clips?

If Comcast can't deliver what they sell, then they shouldn't sell it. Don't sell a 50Mbps pipe that can only handle that speed for a brief millisecond before you throttle it down to dialup speed.


fuziwuzi
Not born yesterday
Premium
join:2005-07-01
Atlanta, GA

reply to openbox9
said by openbox9 See Profile :

You posted previously that a 1.5 Mbps is more than capable of downloading music, videos, patches, etc. You're playing both sides of the discussion. My point is that more throughput is useful regardless of caps and other restrictions. Normal users don't download/upload 24/7 and therefore more likely won't be affected, i.e. downloading legal music, video, software patches, Linux distros, etc.
Comcast thanks you for drinking their kool-aid.

Thaler
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA

reply to openbox9
said by openbox9 See Profile :

My point is that more throughput is useful regardless of caps and other restrictions.
How so? Caps still remain the same. The faster your connection, the more downloads you can whizz through and reach caps quicker.

If anything, a simple 1.5 M connection is probably a good broadband speed to operate on, lest you accidentally bump into Comcast's invisi-caps.

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
reply to fuziwuzi
See my other post about not drinking kool-aid, despising American Idol, and being a Mac fan. Try thinking outside of your little box.

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

reply to Thaler
Why is this so difficult to understand? If I use my connection to download 20 iTunes songs, 20 Amazon MP3s, 4 Netflix movies, and upload 5 new videos and 50 new pics of my 1-year old to my website per month, in addition to normal e-mail checking and web surfing, I'd much rather use a 50/5 connection than a 10/1 connection assuming the same cost to me). I won't have any problems with caps and I'll complete my action quicker. I go back to my earlier comment that if you aren't abusing your connection 24/7, more throughput is good and your ISP shouldn't give you a problem.

And of course a simple 1.5 Mbps connection is a good broadband throughput for a vast majority of users. Now if the rest of the "I need fiber and a Gbps connection jacked directly into my head" accepted that, life would be pretty boring around the discussion threads on this site.

openbox9

join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
·AT&T Southeast

reply to fuziwuzi
I'm not missing any point. You're missing mine. You would need to download a significant number of Apple's HD videos and mp4 files to come close to receiving a warning from more ISPs. Considering those items cost $5 and $1 a piece, unless you have money to waste, I doubt you'll have to worry about that potential problem. The same thing goes for uploading pics for grandma. You're stretching to think that you'll be labelled an abuser for uploading personal pics and vids to your website.
Forums » Comcast Takes The Lead On DOCSIS 3.0« Hmmm  


Wednesday, 25-Nov 16:03:02 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [104] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [94] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [85] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [56] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [48] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [45] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [32] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
· [30] Earthlink Suffers From Major E-mail Outage
· [30] AT&T Offers New Prepaid Wireless plans
· [28] Frontier Increases Modem Rental Fee
Most people now reading
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Climate Change Scandal Erupts After Email Hack. [Security]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]
· Came from FIOS to Comcast and.....I'm glad I did! [Comcast HSI]
· [Rant] The Weather Channel [Rants, Raves, and Praise]
· How do people get virut infection [Security]
· What is the spell hit cap for a lvl 80 full arcane spec mage [World of Warcraft]
· HOW-TO: QoS and Tomato (fixes "choppy voice") [MagicJack]
· [Config] cisco asa 5505 with multiple outside IP addresses [Cisco]