guhuna
R.I.P Mike
Premium
join:2001-03-31
Brentwood, CA | hell ya.
No matter what, pirates are always going to come out on top. |
|
TKJunkMail
Enjoy the sun
Premium
join:2002-03-03
Avalon, NJ
 ·Sprint Mobile Broa..
 ·Comcast
| said by guhuna  :No matter what, pirates are always going to come out on top. And why is that good except for thieves?
--
Internet News
My BLOG
My Web Page |
|
guhuna
R.I.P Mike
Premium
join:2001-03-31
Brentwood, CA
 ·Covad Communications
·SONIC.NET
 ·PAXIO
| I knew you'd chime in.
Because I want a pipe that I can do what I want with it. I dont need (comshit) to tell me what I can and cant do.
It seems that only cable CO's have problem with people using BT.
The provider I am using at this moment (Paxio.net) even told me they welcome BT onto their network.
Now why cant comcast be so nice? |
|
Work
@charter.com
 from:
dadkins
| reply to TKJunkMail
i use BT for alot of things above and beyond piracy.
haev you ever tried to collaborate with other musical artists who're 1400miles away using raw uncompressed audio while trying to build a drum and bass track from the ground up?
ever try to send them that file via a slower transfer method?
Trust me. bittorrent is an effective way to share large files with other people. BT is a tool, much like a gun, a computer or even a dump truck. How someone uses it is entirely seperate from the original purpose.
by your logic, TK, we should 1)ban guns because people use them to kill people, 2)ban computers because people use them to steal other people's identity, and 3) ban dump trucks because people use them to hide dead bodies occasionally.
doesn't make sense to me, but hey, it's your rose colored (or anti-piracy colored, really) glasses. |
|
neonhomer
Honoray Mythbuster
Premium
join:2004-01-27
Edgewater, FL
clubs: | IIRC, Blizzard Entertainment uses Bittorrent to transfer updates for World of Warcraft... |
|
Noah Vail
Premium
join:2004-12-10
Lorton, VA
·RoadRunner Cable
| reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail :said by guhuna :No matter what, pirates are always going to come out on top. And why is that good except for thieves? To which thieves are you referring and why do you choose those particular thieves?
NV
--
Abortion: A Republican Plot to Thin the Liberal Herd. |
|
Thaler
Premium
join:2004-02-02
Encino, CA
| reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail :said by guhuna :No matter what, pirates are always going to come out on top. And why is that good except for thieves? To pirates, I'd agree - its not a good thing. However, for us legal users of BT, this is indeed welcome news. |
|
root9
join:2005-04-08
Kitchener, ON
|  reply to TKJunkMail
HAHAHA ,, you must be slightly misinformed TK Junk Mail and rest of you RIAA CRIA lovers.
Maybe you'd like to learn who the real thieves are:
Try to google video "Ring of Power" and watch it. All 6 hrs of it. Learn it, let it sink in ,, then maybe get back to us here and post some real comments.
Hint: download the video via BT and spread it around.
Å |
|
james
join:2001-02-26
antarctica
| reply to guhuna
Bad argument. I have a car, I should be able to run over whoever I want with it!
A better point would be that copyright enforcement is not beneficial to either the artist or the consumer. The only people getting rich off the current copyright scheme are the middle men who contribute nothing. They USED to contribute by promoting bands and distributing their content, but now all that can be done by the average computer savy child. |
|
knightmb
Everybody Lies
join:2003-12-01
Franklin, TN
·AT&T DSL Service
| reply to TKJunkMail
said by TKJunkMail :said by guhuna :No matter what, pirates are always going to come out on top. And why is that good except for thieves? The "thieves" are really a moot point as they can use one of a million other ways to transfer files. You might as well say that "no matter what, smart people are always going to come out on top". I think that would fit better.
I can think of a few reasons just off the top of my head why it's good.
1) Better use of bandwidth when getting public files
2) Redundant setup so that one single failure doesn't take down the entire swarm
3) More research into better managing large file distribution
4) Gives you a better way to manage your network. If BT and all the others weren't under such a witch hunt, it would make it easier for the network admins to manage the traffic by just looking at a specific port or packet type. But now, with all the ISP trouble, they have to resolve to hiding the traffic so that it looks like web surfing, vpn, or e-mail habits instead. It would be wonderful to traffic shape via just a simple port than have to use special hardware to detect what the packets are doing causing more traffic overhead and costing a lot of money to maintain. |
|
slimpickinz
join:2003-11-29
Conyers, GA
2 edits |  reply to TKJunkMail
TK Junk Mail....
you obviously have never used the technology or you would not cry out "Thief" every time this subject is mentioned.
Get a friggin' grip. |
|
S_engineer
join:2007-05-16
Chicago, IL
·Comcast
| reply to james
Re: hell ya.
said by james :Bad argument. I have a car, I should be able to run over whoever I want with it! A better point would be that copyright enforcement is not beneficial to either the artist or the consumer. The only people getting rich off the current copyright scheme are the middle men who contribute nothing. They USED to contribute by promoting bands and distributing their content, but now all that can be done by the average computer savy child. Very well said.... |
|
raduque
join:2006-07-03
Corpus Christi, TX
| reply to james
Re: hell ya.
Bad analogy! This is more like the city doing something to the roads to prevent you from moving out of the lane you're in because there's a chance you might hit somebody on the side of the road.
Streets are open and free. It's up to you to follow or break the law and use the streets in a considerate way.
The same should be said of the SERVICE you are PAYING FOR. |
|
Combat Chuck
Too Many Cannibals
Premium
join:2001-11-29
Erie, PA
1 edit | reply to james
said by james :The only people getting rich off the current copyright scheme are the middle men who contribute nothing. Wrong, they contribute the ability to absorb risk and knowledge of the market.
If this weren't so bands wouldn't sign contracts with them.
--
Mooooooo!!! |
|
jester121
Premium
join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL | reply to james
Good thing there's no pirated software available as .torrents... 
It's not just about music and movies.  |
|
jester121
Premium
join:2003-08-09
Lake Zurich, IL | reply to Work
That's surprising -- your files are shared and served by that many people? BT isn't really helpful for 1:1 sharing... |
|
Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ | reply to guhuna
i dont think BT should be throttlable, i dont want my WoW patches slowed down when big patches come out.
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports |
|
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
| reply to guhuna
If you want a pipe you can do with as you please, then you should look into a T-1 or something similar. It appears that DSL allows people to use their service much more freely... there's your answer.
Just in case you claim that DSL isn't available in your ares, that excuse doesn't excuse you or any user from violating the AUP/TOS in which you accepted and agreed to.
You also make mention that "It seems that only cable CO's have problem with people using BT." and for that I applaud you... This shouldn't have to be stated to you or anyone in the first place.. Cable is a shared medium and must be managed .. DSL, the slower connection, as you already may know, is a dedicated line to the CO and what you do does not affect others in your neighborhood.
Cable internet has ALWAYS been sold primarily as a residential service for residential type use. That's where I will stop. Anything further is guaranteed to double the current number of messages in this thread. |
|
fiberguy
My views are my own.
Premium
join:2005-05-20
| reply to neonhomer
.. and since you only download them, you should not be affected by the torrents, right?
Or wait.. is blizzard using the last mile end user to distribute their software in which they are being paid for by the end user? If so, then other "end users" are uploading the files FOR Blizzard. (I know the answer to this and am being obvious about something)
It's not your fault that Blizzard updates are being slowed down.. it's not Comcast or any other ISP's fault.. it's Blizzard's fault for not running their own data centers to upload the patches for you to download.
Blizzard, like any other revenue generating business, should not be distributing their patches on the backs of the ISP's last mile users.. they are collecting money each month from the end user in order to operate their business.
Where is the outrage from the paying users of Blizzard for this shoddy practice in the first place?
Sandvine affects upload streams of BT.. |
|
