republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Major Artists May Sue RIAA » What we really meant . . .
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
about time »
« "excessive"? bit of editorializing here ...  
AuthorAll Replies


jbob
Reach Out and Touch Someone
Premium
join:2004-04-26
Little Rock, AR
·Comcast
·AT&T Southwest

reply to TKJunkMail
Re: What we really meant . . .

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

said by newview See Profile :

quote:
"the money has just been delayed due to the complexity of figuring out how to divvy it up"

Translation:
We haven't figured out a legal way to screw the artists completely and keep all the money for ourselves.
No. they don't know how to divvy up the money. The fines collected were not tied to music downloaded on specific artists. So, how do they decide who gets how much? No matter how they split it, some artists are going to feel they deserved a bigger piece of the money than other artists. I'd bet money that that is what is holding everything up.
Honestly I bet they don't care. They certainly have to know what songs were "Distributed"(I'll not use the word downloaded) otherwise they wouldn't be able to come up with a money value settlement to begin with. To begin with they can only attempt suits against song sharers who's artists were with RIAA which not all artists are. Thus some songs are off limits. I'll bet it has gotten to the point where they(RIAA) does not keep a database of who's songs where shared/settled thus negating the money split. The artists depend on the RIAA to help them but in actuality they are simply trying to line their own pockets. Many artists are already being screwed by the record labels as it is.

Skippy25

join:2000-09-13
Hazelwood, MO
They should because if they had to take you to court for it they would have to have specific songs that you were distributing. The court rarely works on broad terms and with this it would certainly require specifics.
Forums » Major Artists May Sue RIAAabout time »
« "excessive"? bit of editorializing here ...  


Wednesday, 02-Dec 16:12:58 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [159] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [83] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [77] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [69] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
· [60] Broadband Killed The Game Console
· [54] Rogers Unveils The ISP Dream Model
· [46] ACTA: Global Three Strikes
· [41] Rural Carriers Quickly Embracing Fiber
· [38] Charter Exits Chapter 11
· [33] AT&T Top Lobbyist Cicconi Has His Feelings Hurt
Most people now reading
· MS admits Windows Updates principally created to annoy [Security]
· A little freaky, not sure if its legit. [Spam, Scam and Phishbusters]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· DK Weapon Upgrade [World of Warcraft]
· Quality/longevity of 15A 120V receptacles [Home Repair & Improvement]
· UBB round 2 at the CRTC [Canadian Broadband]
· Using AirMax to provide triple play services? [Wireless Service Providers]
· Captchas get smarter [Security]
· Am I the only one that loves to work in IT? [No, I Will Not Fix Your #@$!! Computer]
· [Business] how to bridge a smc 8014 business class modem [Comcast HSI]