Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Court Rules for Vonage in Universal Service Fund Case » a data service, not a phone service
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
« Making the wrong point  
AuthorAll Replies


Piggie
Frying Noises in My Brain
Premium
join:2005-11-23
Orange Springs, FL
·HughesNet Satellit..
·Windstream

reply to halfband
Re: a data service, not a phone service

said by halfband See Profile :

... The USF was originally set up to provide pots in rural areas that would have been money losers to wire and service. Since this fund depends on service in one area to subsidise another ... The USF is an obsolete idea that will shortly need an overhaul to move into the current age.
So I am a rural POTS customer. Which means to me it's a surtax to support my own rural POTS. If the intention was to subsidize me from an urban area, then it should not be on my phone bill either. Or I wish! :@)
--
| Speedstream 4200 Modem - 3m/384 plan | W98-W2KSP4-XPSP2 - All AMD | Buffalo WHR G54S with Tomato 1.13 | 3 downstream switches feeding 6 total clients (no wireless) | Including the Data port on the side of my neck |

xsiddalx

join:2005-03-11
Chicago, IL
·AT&T Yahoo
·AT&T DSL Service

I think the overall idea of the Feds was to increase your rates and reduce the costs of LD (imo). Increasing the surcharge and tacking on the USF expense certainly is a step in the right direction...placing more costs on the infrastructure user and less on the telephone user.

The long term goal is to get all of the customers to pay their own pay...

The hope is that cellular, cable, over the top voip, long distance providers + pots, clecs all provide enough competition (again, IMO).

Voice services certainly seem competitive enough these days.
The trick is getting broadband competitive now, to enable more competition in wireless over the top voice (again, imo). USF won't go away, nor will takes. Anyone want to take a stab on why none of the communications company want to add a pass through for their federal income taxes?

said by Piggie See Profile :

said by halfband See Profile :

... The USF was originally set up to provide pots in rural areas that would have been money losers to wire and service. Since this fund depends on service in one area to subsidise another ... The USF is an obsolete idea that will shortly need an overhaul to move into the current age.
So I am a rural POTS customer. Which means to me it's a surtax to support my own rural POTS. If the intention was to subsidize me from an urban area, then it should not be on my phone bill either. Or I wish! :@)
-
Forums » Court Rules for Vonage in Universal Service Fund Case« Making the wrong point  


Friday, 22-Aug 01:19:48 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [106] New Comcast Throttling System = 'A Really Good DSL Experience'
· [101] Was FiOS a Good Idea?
· [80] Shouldn't You Be Able To Buy Your Cable Box?
· [79] ISPs Whine About Network Neutrality 'Paranoia'
· [77] Landscaping, Courtesy of AT&T?
· [76] FCC Finally Issues Comcast Throttling Order
· [57] Craig Moffett: Network Upgrades Are For Ninnies
· [56] Google Launches White Space Broadband Website
· [56] Did Apple iPhone Fix Make Problems Worse?
· [55] AT&T Cooking Up New VoIP Product
Most people now reading
· Port 25 being blocked nation wide....WTF [Comcast HSI]
· Anyone know how to capture NBCOlympics.com video streams [General Questions]
· Neighbor Yanks a Power Line & Voltage Overloads the Block [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Criss Angel revealed. [56k lookout! (broadband heavy)]
· How I Stole Someone's Identity [Security]
· DIR-655 Firmware 1.20 Released [D-Link]
· Just reccived a message from Jim Prentice [TekSavvy]
· Hunter Shot Macro's [World of Warcraft]