RadioDoc
Sortofadog
Premium,ExMod 2000-03
join:2000-05-11
Chicago, IL
 ·AT&T Midwest
| reply to zed260
Re: now
said by zed260  :cox is honest at least when you ask them I think that is the reason right there. The coverup is always worse than the act being covered up.
--
Toolmaster of La Grange. |
|
zed260
join:2007-09-30
Cleveland, TN | in my opinion id rather pay 300 dollors a month for an honest internet provider then a penny for a dishonest one |
|
Skeedatl
Ah, push it - push it real good
Premium
join:2007-12-26
The Cloud | For a penny, I'll take the dishonest one, but $46-$56? No way. |
|
LeftOfSanity
join:2005-11-06
Felton, DE
edit:
March 28th, @08:03AM
| reply to zed260
said by zed260 :in my opinion id rather pay 300 dollors a month for an honest internet provider then a penny for a dishonest one Said the pirate. lol
Edit: Not saying you are personally, just thought that was funny. |
|
VariableARK
join:2003-03-17
USA
| reply to zed260
agreed, if you don't like comcasts practices, go to another provider, there are plenty of providers out there that DONT block traffic, or that are honest. Vote with your dollars, thats how capitalism is supposed to work, not with constant government intervention. |
|
King P
Don't blame me. I voted for Ron Paul
Premium
join:2004-11-17
Inman, SC | especially when comcast is one of your TWO choices for internet providers, with the other being AT&T. Yep capitalism at it's finest right here... |
|
VariableARK
join:2003-03-17
USA
| I nearly guarantee that there are other smaller providers in your area, you just need to look. And on the very off chance that there isn't, if you care enough and there is a market for it, start your own ISP. Simple, capitalism is a self-regulating system; a Ron Paul voter should know that  |
|
funchords
Robb
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Hillsboro, OR
·Verizon Online DSL
 ·Skype
 ·Comcast
edit:
March 28th, @02:54PM
| said by VariableARK :I nearly guarantee that there are other smaller providers in your area, the FCC killed that possibility in 2005.
While you're right that nothing prevents new companies from joining the fray, any new carrier has to lay its own redundant infrastructure, tearing up the rights-of-ways just to place their fiber on top of Verizon's fiber, or their copper along side of AT&T's copper, or their coaxial cable atop Comcast's.
And after they're done tearing up the town, let's watch the companies fight it out as they blame each other for cutting wires or interfering with signals on wet crossed lines.
Dumb way to go -- there are plenty of rich people who could be investors, but there's not a lot of dumb rich people who would invest in such a perilous venture.
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
FCC Public Hearing on the Future of the Internet - Thursday, April 17th - Stanford Univ., Calif. |
|
