R0CKY
TSI Rocky
Premium,VIP
join:2005-05-19
Chatham, ON
1 edit | reply to messanger321
Re: Update on Throttling: Part 2...
said by messanger321 :now don't shoot the messenger but... This guys blog more or less states that wholesalers like rocky suckles from Bells tites and because he doesn't have his own equipment (radious servers) he deserves what he gets. he also stated that all those who posted on Geists blog are hysterical (not the first time he states this). » mhgoldberg.com/blog/2008/03/is-b···nti.htmlIn his next blog he also states its well within Bells right to throttle: » mhgoldberg.com/blog/2008/03/tari···fic.htmlThis guy, in my opinion, is either on bell payroll or a complete moron, or both. You decided (or tell him). Radius Servers? Huh.... If he thinks we don't have our own Radius Servers, then he's confused on how this all works.
Also, no, Bell is not within their rights to do this.
PS - LOL... He's not biased ( »www.mhgoldberg.com/MarkHG.pdf)
Rocky
--
TSI Rocky - TekSavvy Solutions Inc. |
|
Guspaz
Guspaz
Premium,MVM
join:2001-11-05
Montreal, QC
 ·Colbanet
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| In my reading, he never mentioned Radius servers. He said (paraphrasing) "In these circumstances, if ISPs like TekSavvy want to stick to their principles, they should start building out their own networks."
Which, in all honestly, wouldn't be such a bad idea. Extremely expensive perhaps, but it's a nice pie-in-the-sky idea. |
|
R0CKY
TSI Rocky
Premium,VIP
join:2005-05-19
Chatham, ON
| said by Guspaz  :In my reading, he never mentioned Radius servers. He said (paraphrasing) "In these circumstances, if ISPs like TekSavvy want to stick to their principles, they should start building out their own networks." Which, in all honestly, wouldn't be such a bad idea. Extremely expensive perhaps, but it's a nice pie-in-the-sky idea. It would be interesting to see if we would receive the same or equal funding the Government provides Bell to do this.
--
TSI Rocky - TekSavvy Solutions Inc. |
|
Flannel
join:2007-11-28
·Bell Sympatico
1 edit | said by R0CKY :[...]funding the Government provides Bell[...] Gotta love it... government is aiming for net neutrality (net access for all) while Bell is aiming for Executive bonuses. |
|
Doci
Toothless Fairy
join:2003-02-01
·Bell Sympatico
| reply to R0CKY
said by R0CKY :said by messanger321 :now don't shoot the messenger but... This guys blog more or less states that wholesalers like rocky suckles from Bells tites and because he doesn't have his own equipment (radious servers) he deserves what he gets. he also stated that all those who posted on Geists blog are hysterical (not the first time he states this). » mhgoldberg.com/blog/2008/03/is-b···nti.htmlIn his next blog he also states its well within Bells right to throttle: » mhgoldberg.com/blog/2008/03/tari···fic.htmlThis guy, in my opinion, is either on bell payroll or a complete moron, or both. You decided (or tell him). Radius Servers? Huh.... If he thinks we don't have our own Radius Servers, then he's confused on how this all works. Also, no, Bell is not within their rights to do this. PS - LOL... He's not biased ( » www.mhgoldberg.com/MarkHG.pdf) Rocky That dude is Grade A clown. Why is he bringing wireline into this? |
|
Flannel
join:2007-11-28
·Bell Sympatico
| said by Doci :[...]That dude is Grade A clown. Yeah, what's he saying by "start building out more of their own network"? He wants them to run wires? The government granted Bell monopoly had one hundred (!) unchallenged years to install its network everywhere. He really is a Doofus. |
|
