site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
649
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

dave
Premium,MVM
join:2000-05-04
not in ohio
kudos:8

False dichotomy

Most respondents here have allowed the network providers to frame the argument - it's either high-speed broadband or no eyesores.

Why can't there be both?

Oh, someone might have lower profits. Nevermind.


gaforces
United We Stand, Divided We Fall

join:2002-04-07
Santa Cruz, CA

They could bury the boxes and still provide adequate cooling, it would just cost more. Or they could leave them above ground and have artists design the boxes or alter existing boxes to be more attractive.
There would be a big difference between an ugly square box and a piece of art. Oh ya, that costs more money ...
--
There is no greater sign of a general decay of virtue in a nation, than a want of zeal in its inhabitants for the good of their country. ~ Joseph Addison


patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

Burying is easy. Its called a CEV. Only problem is $$$$$$. Uverse is 99 cent store next gen broadband.


Wednesday, 19-Jun 09:21:13 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics