Help CAIP in it's CRTC submission re throttling via Bell

CanadianISP Premium join:2008-04-09 Beachburg, ON	reply to CanadianISP Re: Help CAIP in it's CRTC submission re throttling via Bell This is excellent folks! As Canadians, we can often be (fairly) labelled as complacent or lasser-faire when things don't go our way - This is how things are changed - By people voicing their opinions to those in power - Believe me, those who pay the lobbyists do exactly that and they get their way. If you've submitted your response to the CRTC - Thank you, on behalf of both ISPs and affected Canadians. Now, we need to let our MPs know that this issue is important to us, that "Letting the market decide" is not sufficient when talking about a monopoly's control over something as important as Internet access. If you need help finding your MP, you can use this link to find your MP by postal code (Link to Government of Canada website) -- Marc Bissonnette Chief BOFH »www.canadianisp.com
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-06-09 20:48:16 ·
r5a join:2006-02-05 Toronto, ON	reply to CanadianISP Sent.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-06-09 20:35:02 ·
dgass join:2007-09-27 Mississauga, ON	reply to CanadianISP Done
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-06-09 16:44:24 ·
qjhdjfhs @bell.ca 1 edit	reply to CanadianISP Tried twice, successful the first time, but got the following error the first time: Server Error in '/CRTCSubmissionMU' Application. Validation of viewstate MAC failed. If this application is hosted by a Web Farm or cluster, ensure that configuration specifies the same validationKey and validation algorithm. AutoGenerate cannot be used in a cluster. Description: An unhandled exception occurred during the execution of the current web request. Please review the stack trace for more information about the error and where it originated in the code. Exception Details: System.Web.HttpException: Validation of viewstate MAC failed. If this application is hosted by a Web Farm or cluster, ensure that configuration specifies the same validationKey and validation algorithm. AutoGenerate cannot be used in a cluster. Source Error: [No relevant source lines] Source File: c:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\Temporary ASP.NET Files\crtcsubmissionmu\701e4e50\8e46569\App_Web_telecom.aspx.ba00be51.njmrafj_.0.cs Line: 0 Stack Trace: [HttpException (0x80004005): Unable to validate data.] System.Web.Configuration.MachineKeySection.GetDecodedData(Byte[] buf, Byte[] modifier, Int32 start, Int32 length, Int32& dataLength) +294 System.Web.UI.ObjectStateFormatter.Deserialize(String inputString) +203 [ViewStateException: Invalid viewstate. Client IP: ** Port: ** User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9b5) Gecko/2008050509 Firefox/3.0b5 ViewState: Cd4dTNJfzVy5f00ZiocJfh07damW6lCkip0hYPZ3HbPSjz8s4OgYRuqD1EQBnfbpMcmchk6v2Hhy3ZCJtD /fTGDnySmlVjqjlkHi0Fs2fGyi2WuN50iXgK3F9XZUMsQJuIQ3Ors0JasYy6Ywy71BENzGSGMa6zTA5odvX 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...] [HttpException (0x80004005): Validation of viewstate MAC failed. If this application is hosted by a Web Farm or cluster, ensure that configuration specifies the same validationKey and validation algorithm. AutoGenerate cannot be used in a cluster.] System.Web.UI.ViewStateException.ThrowError(Exception inner, String persistedState, String errorPageMessage, Boolean macValidationError) +267 System.Web.UI.ObjectStateFormatter.Deserialize(String inputString) +282 System.Web.UI.ObjectStateFormatter.System.Web.UI.IStateFormatter.Deserialize(String serializedState) +4 System.Web.UI.Util.DeserializeWithAssert(IStateFormatter formatter, String serializedState) +37 System.Web.UI.HiddenFieldPageStatePersister.Load() +198 System.Web.UI.Page.LoadPageStateFromPersistenceMedium() +83 System.Web.UI.Page.LoadAllState() +35 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +7350 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) +213 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest() +86 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestWithNoAssert(HttpContext context) +18 System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context) +49 ASP.forms_telecom_aspx.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context) in c:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\Temporary ASP.NET Files\crtcsubmissionmu\701e4e50\8e46569\App_Web_telecom.aspx.ba00be51.njmrafj_.0.cs:0 System.Web.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() +358 System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) +64 Version Information: Microsoft .NET Framework Version:2.0.50727.1433; ASP.NET Version:2.0.50727.1433
	to forum · permalink · 2008-05-24 15:14:15 ·
andyb Premium join:2003-05-29 SW Ontario	reply to Abattoir My reply is not on there and I posted the day after caip filed.Must be a backlog.I got a reply from my MP 2 weeks ago thou.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-05-14 09:51:47 ·
R0CKY TSI Rocky Premium,VIP join:2005-05-19 Chatham, ON	reply to Abattoir No clue, but I'm pretty sure this has got to be one of if not the highest public response they've had on anything to date. -- TSI Rocky - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-05-14 09:49:08 ·
Abattoir join:2008-03-27 Ottawa, ON ·TekSavvy Solutions.. ·Cogeco Cable ·Bell Sympatico	reply to R0CKY said by R0CKY : Apparently the total is much higher than 1100... As I hear it, if they add everyone that has submitted, we should be somewhere between 2k and 3k+ somewhere. I wouldn't be surprised. My own comments weren't posted for weeks after I originally posted. I wonder what the true number is. What kind of effect can comments from the public actually have on the CRTC's decision?
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-05-14 09:40:27 ·
R0CKY TSI Rocky Premium,VIP join:2005-05-19 Chatham, ON	reply to Abattoir Apparently the total is much higher than 1100... As I hear it, if they add everyone that has submitted, we should be somewhere between 2k and 3k+ somewhere. -- TSI Rocky - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-05-14 09:36:15 ·
Abattoir join:2008-03-27 Ottawa, ON ·TekSavvy Solutions.. ·Cogeco Cable ·Bell Sympatico	reply to CanadianISP We're now at 1084 comments by the public. Of course, I'm assuming that they are all in support of CAIP. I haven't come across any in support of Bell. Anyone check if Jason Laszlo commented?
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-05-14 09:31:54 ·
Arthur Dent @rogers.com	reply to CanadianISP Done.
	to forum · permalink · 2008-05-13 22:46:51 ·
easier @shawcable.net	reply to CanadianISP easier to make a submission here: »stopthethrottler.ca
	to forum · permalink · 2008-05-09 23:45:03 ·
BellIsAJoke @cybersurf.com	reply to SeaParrot done.
	to forum · permalink · 2008-05-05 19:53:23 ·
SeaParrot @bell.ca	reply to CanadianISP Done !
	to forum · permalink · 2008-05-02 17:03:12 ·
refile it @videotron.ca	reply to Angelo_ said by Angelo_ : i'm not even listed If its not there after a week, refile.
	to forum · permalink · 2008-05-02 16:40:35 ·
drjp81 join:2006-01-09 canada	reply to CanadianISP Done
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-05-02 16:09:09 ·
Gnaraktol join:2008-03-18 Gatineau, QC	reply to CanadianISP I re-submitted, seems like my original post wasn't there...
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-05-02 16:02:01 ·
Angelo_ The Network Guy Premium join:2002-06-18	reply to oh Look i'm not even listed
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-05-02 16:01:38 ·
R0CKY TSI Rocky Premium,VIP join:2005-05-19 Chatham, ON	reply to CanadianISP Nice.... that list is now 700! »www.crtc.gc.ca/public/partvii/20···_com.htm -- TSI Rocky - TekSavvy Solutions Inc.
	to forum · permalink · · 2008-05-02 11:38:51 ·
oh Look @videotron.ca	reply to look at seems like the CRTC did some web page updates. There's about 800 submissions online now by the people in support of CAIP. Keep it going, and don't let up! If you are copying/pasting the text from the first post of this topic & your VOIP or VPN is affected just add (in addition to the pre-written text for you) that you VPN/VOIP is inoperable at the times of the throttle and how it affects you work or even can affect emergency 911 calls, or whatever you care to add. Lets try and get 1000 submission up there by early next week!
	to forum · permalink · 2008-05-02 11:32:22 ·
look at @videotron.ca	reply to DaTTa Be aware of: »Is your VoIP or VPN affected by Bell's throttling practices? Same as this one, but that link asks if you have VOIP or VPN problems to submit them to the CRTC
	to forum · permalink · 2008-04-23 01:01:50 ·


Friday, 04-Dec 03:34:42	Terms of Use \| Privacy Policy \| Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo \| feedback \| contact over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com. page compression OFF