republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » FCC's Martin: No Net Neutrality Laws Needed » Build your own network if you're unhappy...
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Most cable companies are monopolies »
« Not Good  
AuthorAll Replies


asdfdfdfdfdf

@Level3.net


from:
wtansill See Profile

reply to bicker
Re: Build your own network if you're unhappy...

"what they're offering is the best any supplier is willing to provide you."

You completely ignore the effects of market power and the way that such conditions can lock out competitors. There can be enormous barriers to entry for new businesses. This has nothing to do with what a supplier is willing to do and everything to do with whether one has any chance of overcoming the advantages that previous entrants have in the market.

bicker

join:2007-05-10
Burlington, MA
·Verizon FIOS

Barriers to entry don't constitute any obligation owed to you. There are multiple suppliers in areas where sufficient profit motive is offered. So the blame for a lack of suppliers of the specific type of Internet service you want, high-speed Internet, rests squarely on CONSUMERS resisting those offerings at the price they're being offered at.


RainWind

join:2000-10-20
Van Wert, OH

People have no alternative options because competition is blocked. You argument really holds no water, you just seem to like telling people they have a childish "give me now" mentality when that isn't even the case.

We either need more regulation or the government needs to piss off and let other companies move in to compete when and how they please. No more slapping Verizon's hand for offering special deals to customer's who have initiated a port out request. No blocking of new competition. No more regulating what a company can charge. Telco's can't just drop their pricing at will to compete with cable.

All people are asking for is a little pro-consumer regulation because one company is given a monopoly in an specific area and there is no alternate provider because of it.

The blame is not on the consumers. The problem is regulation and the local government pushing away competition. Your argument might have a point, if it wasn't for the fact that the reason competition doesn't move in has to do with government and regulation. Verizon can't just waltz into a town and start laying fiber.

Either competition needs to stop getting cock blocked, or the government needs to go one step further with regulation.

bicker

join:2007-05-10
Burlington, MA
·Verizon FIOS

Competition is not blocked. That's a cop-out business-haters use to distort the issue. Competition is what it is, and it is what it is because that's how much profit there is in offering competing services.

You call it "pro-consumer regulation" but what it really is is Big Brother interfering with business. And look at the REALITY... thirty years and counting of a pro-business perspective in this country and there are still people like you who refuse to acknowledge it. Even the Democrats are pro-business now.


asdfdfdfdfdfdf

@Level3.net

reply to bicker
"Barriers to entry don't constitute any obligation owed to you."

I don't know why you are accusing me of making such an argument. That isn't my argument.

"There are multiple suppliers in areas where sufficient profit motive is offered"

Again you ignore the way things like network effects and first mover advantage drastically alters the economic calculations for those wishing to enter the market after the first mover is established and impose a quite different set of costs on those trying to compete with the dominant player.

Is "sufficient profit" something that is probable or even possible or is it something absurd?

Of course any barriers can be overcome by an extreme enough set of circumstances(such as if everyone was willing to pay a million dollars a month for an internet connection) but that doesn't mean such things will happen with any set of probable real world parameters.
Forums » FCC's Martin: No Net Neutrality Laws NeededMost cable companies are monopolies »
« Not Good  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 03:12:37 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [194] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [62] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [50] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
· [20] AT&T Releases Network Reporting iPhone App
Most people now reading
· Man Downloads Child Porn "Accidentally," Faces 20 Years [Security]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for 3.1 [World of Warcraft]
· Using DIR-615 C1/3.01 with Trendnet TEW-652BRP in N Mode [D-Link]
· Comcast Customers: Would You Prefer Metered Billing? [Comcast HSI]
· Extjs grid combo box. [Webmasters and Developers]
· [ Classes] ATTN Death Knights - Post your spec for critique! [World of Warcraft]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]