www.broadbandreports.com
  
Search:  

 
   AllHot TopicsCable SupportTelco SupportHardware etcSecurityClubsGallery»»






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T Northeast » [help] How does ATT DSL compare to Optimum Online Cable?
 
Search Topic:
  Social:
topic feed
 
Posting
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC

reply to jpwriting
Re: [help] How does ATT DSL compare to Optimum Online Cable?

All Internet is shared. DSL is just shared farther out (at the aggregation router) than cable (on the last mile).

I've seen Embarq and Qwest (DSL) users posting latencies in the 100s to 400s. I've very rarely seen Comcast and Road Runner (cable) users posting such high latencies. But that is not normal deviation

I don't believe that cable is inherently so bad, compared with DSL, WRT latency. DSL latency deviation is normally 1-3 ms on an average of 8-9 ms close to the premises. Cable latency deviation, that I have seen, is normally 8-10 ms on an average of 5-6 ms close to the premises.

I am referring to the statistical standard deviation from a statistical average.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum

jpwriting

join:2008-02-21
Enfield, CT


edit:
April 27th, @03:15AM

You seem to be taking my reply personally, ie: as if I were trying to prove you wrong somehow. I only said sometimes it is an understatement, the cable in my area had terrible deviations in ping based on conditions and that DSL is effectively not shared on a neighborhood basis due to the difference in the way it is handled. I never said one was better than the other, only that it depends on the condition of the service in the area.

Please don't read too much into a reply and go on the defensive from the word go, I'm not here to pick a fight or argument, prove how much I know, etc. I was only giving the OP my reasons for preferring ATT ADSL over Cable, and that is performs quite well as a less expensive more dependable alternative (albeit with generally lower top speeds).

I don't believe that the OP is looking for statistical standard deviation (which as you said deals with a minimal difference of a few milliseconds). He's looking for real world application that would be of significant influence to his decision. I was trying to give him that input.

Adding to that information: my speeds are 6000kb/s down 630kb/s upstream with little variance, they almost never change far from that. Ping is generally 57-65ms.

Edit: forgot to add ping as requested.

NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC

said by jpwriting See Profile :

You seem to be taking my reply personally, ie: as if I were trying to prove you wrong somehow.
Seriously? I don't particularly care what you think about me.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum


skj
Welcome to the far side of reality
Premium,Mod
join:2002-04-04
Atlanta, GA
reply to NormanS
And now back on topic please.
Forums » US Telco Support » AT&T » AT&T Northeast

Most commented news this week
· [169] Obama Addresses FISA Immunity Critics
· [126] July Fourth Open Thread
· [120] Time Warner Cable: Caps 'Make Your Internet Experience Better'
· [116] AOL Raises Dial-Up Prices
· [105] SMS: You're Paying $1,310 (Or More) Per Megabyte
· [97] Video Wall at Comcast Building Draws Tourist Attention
· [87] Canadian iPhone: Get Less, Pay More
· [83] How Much Bandwidth Do We Really Need?
· [78] Additional AT&T iPhone Pricing Details
· [77] AT&T, CT Settle Dispute Over 'Lawn Fridges'
Sunday, 06-Jul
03:20:55
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
8th year online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF