andranic
join:2002-07-20
Bayside, NY
| reply to andranic
Re: [TWC] NYC disappointing HD update (queens)
First I would like to address the person who said something about "then and than". I'm typing fast and didn't bother checking all the grammatical errors that might be in my post.That is why you might see some mistakes. you will see many mistakes when reading forums.
Back to the topic.
I know its the networks that are not broadcasting in HD but I feel there are many other networks out there that do broadcast mostly in HD that TWC could have added. Many people are stating to get tired of not having Programing in HD. I got my first HDTV in 2002 and there has been little done in terms of content since then. |
|
golden eagle
Aquila chrysaetos
Premium
join:2002-08-06
On a cliff
clubs:
| I, like you, have been disappointed by the lack of HD content provided thus far. That being said, it isn't fair to single out/blame TW for the content. TW is not responsible for a content/programing on those particular channels. I will say that while TW has been dreadfully slow to add HD channels they seem to be making a concerted effort now.
Oh, one last thought. Perhaps TW's delay in adding channels has something to do with the "piss poor" amount of HD programming available. Not even the networks provide HD content 100% of the time.
--
Support U.S. Troops. |
|
Steve Mehs
Go Sabres
join:2005-07-16
| reply to andranic
quote:
I know its the networks that are not broadcasting in HD but I feel there are many other networks out there that do broadcast mostly in HD that TWC could have added.
Like what? HD Net, HD Net Movies, Universal HD, MHD, and Mojo HD are pretty much the only channels that contian 100% HD content, unstreached, all the time, and most TW franchises carry all those channels.
quote:
I got my first HDTV in 2002 and there has been little done in terms of content since then.
I got my first HDTV in 2006 and there has been A LOT done in terms of content since then.
--
Time Warner Cable Subscriber
Digital Cable & Road Runner Turbo
252 Channels, HD DVR & 15/1 Broadband
I Don't Want No Stinkin' Fios! |
|
andranic
join:2002-07-20
Bayside, NY
| how about NY1, Fox business, MSG+hd.... rather then those couldn't we have Sci-FI HD and USA HD ?
bottom line is that its great that TW is making steps to give us more HD channels but this update wasn't that impressive hopefully the next update will be soon and we will get some more channels that are worth watching. |
|
Gts
Hi
join:2000-10-27
Astoria, NY | The next update should be better, but from the looks of things i dunno anymore. Kinda wish another provider would make me a offer i cant refuse =( |
|
Steve Mehs
Go Sabres
join:2005-07-16
| reply to andranic
USA and SciFi? Why would I want to watch a bunch of old syndicated programming and cut up commercial ridden movies? No thanks. MSG+ (FSN NY) is not one of my RSNs, but MSG HD was my most wanted HD channel. Buffalo Sabres action in HD! Now we have that, Fox Business News HD and Fox News Channel HD are now the two HD channels I want the most. More HD is always good, but I could careless about USA HD or SciFi HD at this time.
--
Time Warner Cable Subscriber
Digital Cable & Road Runner Turbo
252 Channels, HD DVR & 15/1 Broadband
I Don't Want No Stinkin' Fios! |
|
djrobx
join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
 ·AT&T U-Verse
 ·AT&T CallVantage
·Time Warner VOIP
 ·RoadRunner Cable
 ·DSL EXTREME
edit:
May 21st, @12:26PM
| quote:
USA and SciFi? Why would I want to watch a bunch of old syndicated programming and cut up commercial ridden movies?
Both networks offer original programming and original movies. Full time? No. But nor do most other cable networks.
There's nothing more annoying than watching something in SD when you know it's available in HD. Sometimes I'll even wait for a DVD release just because I can't stand "broadcast SD" quality.
I couldn't care less about sports networks. |
|
