site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:33
Host:
Time Warner Intern..
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech

reply to funchords

Re: My initial thoughts -- BAD PLAN that can easily be made good

The cap is reasonable.

But I think the argument here might not be whether 250GB per month is reasonable, but whether allowing a U.S. carrier for the first time to charge overage fees opens the door to a future where those caps are constantly trending downwards, while the per GB fees rise upwards.

Honestly, once the door is open I have to believe it's a downward slide....


funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Yarmouth Port, MA
kudos:6

said by Karl Bode:

The cap is reasonable.

But I think the argument here might not be whether 250GB per month is reasonable, but whether allowing a U.S. carrier for the first time to charge overage fees opens the door to a future where those caps are constantly trending downwards, while the per GB fees rise upwards.

Honestly, once the door is open I have to believe it's a downward slide....
As opposed to undisclosed (and seemingly arbitrary) caps and disconnection? This choice is the lesser of the two evils.

But that you're worried about it gives me pause.

I am worried about a static cap -- I share your concern that it will retard much-needed growth.

I'm also still thinking about myself -- 6 Mbps/384 Kbps here. With 250 GB being roughly 768 Kbps (constant), I have to wonder what the suckerscustomers in Minneapolis who shell out $150 a month for 50/5 Mbps are thinking right about now!!
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- Hillsboro, Oregon
HTTP is the new Bandwidth Hog...


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
kudos:33
Host:
Time Warner Intern..
PC gaming GAMES
PC gaming Tech

1 edit

quote:
As opposed to undisclosed (and seemingly arbitrary) caps and disconnection? This choice is the lesser of the two evils.
I'll have to see the final plan before I fully chime in, but a 250GB plan with steep overages (and likely continued throttling of pirated P2P traffic PLUS harsh DMCA enforcement) versus a 600GB plan with forged TCP reset connections that throttle BitTorrent? So far I'd argue it's a push....maybe a slight nod toward the former because there's some honesty involved.

I just think once you give investors the window where overages are an accepted part of the industry, the natural trend will continue to be providing less bandwidth for more money.

Wednesday, 19-Jun 00:55:16 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics