Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Tech and Talk » City Chat » Connecticut Chat » [INFO] Carbon emissions bill
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
1037
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Weee new train cars coming along nice! »
page: 1 · 2 · 3
AuthorAll Replies

pandora
Premium
join:2001-06-01
Outland
·Comcast


edit:
May 8th, @08:55AM

 [INFO] Carbon emissions bill

It looks like our state is going to have a carbon emissions mandate. By 2020 we'll have to reduce our emissions to 1990 - 10% levels. The easiest way to achieve this, will be to toss out all industry, increase electricity rates by 20-50%, add a sur-tax on anything larger than a Prius, tax home heating oil and propane. The new taxes on electricity start this September!

As taxes are used to achieve this new self imposed mandate, many will be seriously considering leaving the state.

Turns out Kermit was correct, it's not easy being green.

Story at - »www.theday.com/re.aspx?re=5b8359···caf044c4

Hartford - The Senate on Monday unanimously backed a mandate to cut emissions of greenhouse gases in Connecticut, keeping the state on pace with others in its efforts to combat global warming.

The bill, which had already passed the House of Representatives overwhelmingly and now goes to Gov. M. Jodi Rell, makes mandatory the emissions targets first approved by the legislature in 2004.

The measure would require that emissions of greenhouse gases in the state be cut to at least 10 percent below their 1990 levels by 2020. It would also require a cut to 80 percent below 2001 levels by 2050.

In addition, the legislation requires state agencies to begin working toward those emissions targets and directs the state Department of Environmental Protection to help guide other agencies in reducing their emissions.

...

Connecticut is a member of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, which aims to cut carbon dioxide emissions from power plants in the Northeast by instituting a cap-and-trade program. Pollution credits from the program will be auctioned off to power generators for the first time in September, and up to 7.5 percent of the proceeds from the auction would be available to help pay for the costs of the bill approved Monday.
--
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use."


Sr Tech
Premium
join:2003-01-19
New Fairfield, CT
I have no idea what these people are thinking in Hartford. All I can say without being nasty.
--
Got HAM, KE1MG


Glenn
I'D Rather Be Skiing
Premium
join:2000-10-05
Wallingford, CT

reply to pandora
There was a wonderful editorial in the Wall Street Journal a few weeks back about cutting emissions. They stated that one of the proposals would have attempted to put as back to emissions levels that this country couldn't met in the 1700's.

I can't wait until people start taking a real, logical, scientific, non hyped look at "global warming." I have a feeling there will be a lot of egg on faces. Kinda like how everyone was hailing ethanol...but "oops! Drives up food prices!"
--
Legal ATVing in Connecticut?


pleekmo
Triptoe Through The Tulips
Premium
join:2001-09-14
Manchester, CT
clubs:
·AT&T DSL Service

said by Glenn See Profile :

I can't wait until people start taking a real, logical, scientific, non hyped look at "global warming."
I hate to tell you this, but the logic of the situation is this:

The best belief of many (most) of the world's scientists is that at current levels of increase in carbon dioxide the Earth will soon experience a runaway moist greenhouse (that is, the Earth would end up with a climate similar to Venus'), after which THERE WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WE COULD DO TO STOP IT.

So the point of the matter is that we can act now to ensure by reducing our greenhouse emissions to a safe level that we do not reach this point. I repeat, after we reach the point of runaway greenhouse there will be absolutely nothing we could do about it.

We can act now to make sure we never have this happen or we can do nothing and possibly extinquish most, if not all, life from Earth.

Are you willing to bet that we will not reach a runaway greenhouse or are you willing to do something to make certain that it never happens?
--
HCN: Because you deserve a rest!

Proud member of the Free Omelas Liberation Front.


gregamy

join:2003-05-22
Middletown, CT


edit:
May 8th, @04:04PM

said by pleekmo See Profile :

Are you willing to bet that we will not reach a runaway greenhouse...?
Yes.

Someone pass me a beer? I need to release me some more carbon dioxide...


gregamy

join:2003-05-22
Middletown, CT

Very few people can say it as well as Dr. Williams...

Environmentalists' Wild Predictions
»www.townhall.com/columnists/Walt···dictions

"It's not just latter-day doomsayers who have been wrong; doomsayers have always been wrong..."

pandora
Premium
join:2001-06-01
Outland
·Comcast

 reply to pleekmo
said by pleekmo See Profile :

I hate to tell you this, but the logic of the situation is this:

The best belief of many (most) of the world's scientists is that at current levels of increase in carbon dioxide the Earth will soon experience a runaway moist greenhouse (that is, the Earth would end up with a climate similar to Venus'), after which THERE WOULD BE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WE COULD DO TO STOP IT.

So the point of the matter is that we can act now to ensure by reducing our greenhouse emissions to a safe level that we do not reach this point. I repeat, after we reach the point of runaway greenhouse there will be absolutely nothing we could do about it.

We can act now to make sure we never have this happen or we can do nothing and possibly extinquish most, if not all, life from Earth.

Are you willing to bet that we will not reach a runaway greenhouse or are you willing to do something to make certain that it never happens?
With all due respect.

1) Global warming has caused the inter-glacial period we are enjoying. Without it, there would be virtually no life in Connecticut and it would be uninhabitable. Global warming has been one of the greatest gifts humanity has received.

2) I seriously doubt there is a scientific consensus Earths climate is headed toward that of Venus. CO2 is one of the weaker global warming gases, and while increases in it may very well be human caused to a large extent the full ramifications of increased CO2 into our atmosphere are mostly the science fiction work of computer models. The models get more money if they make increasingly dire predictions.

3) Connecticut by itself cannot possibly resolve global warming. It can however, cause great harm to its citizens by acting unilaterally on this issue.

4) Per capita energy consumption in the U.S. over the past generation is down. Only via immigration is our energy consumption up. We have been unable to control immigration into the U.S. until we do so, it will be impossible to stabilize our energy consumption.

5) The taxes which will be imposed on citizens of Connecticut will be regressive, affecting those who are poorest or on fixed incomes most. The result will be catastrophic for those with the least voice in Hartford.

6) Energy rates in Connecticut are already a disaster. This proposal will only compound our energy problem, and will preclude any industry from considering our state as a place to do business if there are any alternatives.
--
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use."

bennor

join:2006-07-22
New Haven, CT

And while reducing our carbon footprint/greenhouse emissions is a good idea it won't do much good (gasp) if there is no one left in the state of Connecticut other than the politicians in Hartford due to the taxes and fees they assess to try and reduce greenhouse emissions. There needs to be a realistic balance that can bring business into CT (so you know those guys up in Hartford can bring tax us more so they can continue to spend more) and to satisfy the "greenies" and tree huggers in this state.

Also we in the US can reduce all of our greenhouse gas emissions all we'd like but it won't do much good if other countries surpass us. Oh wait, China already has. »www.physorg.com/news127495011.html


Glenn
I'D Rather Be Skiing
Premium
join:2000-10-05
Wallingford, CT

reply to pleekmo
said by pleekmo See Profile :

said by Glenn See Profile :

Are you willing to bet that we will not reach a runaway greenhouse?
Yep!

In the 1970's, we were scared into thinking the entire Northeast would be a treeless moonscape due to acid rain by the 1990's (or thereabouts).

In the 1980's we were told the hole in the ozone layer was going to create a giant microwave effect and we'd all be cooked by the year 2000 (or thereabouts).

How's that saying go? Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice shame on me. Try to fool me a third time....don't bother because I'm not listening.
--
Legal ATVing in Connecticut?


signmeuptoo
Obama can save the economy Vision
Premium
join:2001-11-22
Tardis in TN
clubs:
·EarthLink
·Earthlink Cable Mo..
·Packet8
·AT&T Southeast

reply to pandora
I used to work at Sandia National Labs. The consensus at the labs, the HUGE majority, are CERTAIN that global warming is manmade and that global temps are going up as much as or more than 4 degrees and if it continues, it can lead to extinction of life.

You who are conservatives are welcome to think what you want, but the massive and overwhelming consensus in the scientific community is that we have entered into a crises, perhaps the worst crises to humanity ever.

I used to be a conservative that laughed at it my own self. Then I went to work at the labs and my political convictions were shaken at the core. Yes, now I am liberal, but only on principles.

So go ahead, deny it is happening, it's only your children and grand children's lives, right?

Why shouldn't Connecticut move unilaterally? Most of Europe already has done so, Japan has done so, California is doing so... It's a question of acting responsibly.

Besides, going "green" doesn't have to be costly in the long term. We need laws helping induce people to install solar panels, if every home had solar generation we could easily reduce carbon emissions so much it might help.

I am almost 50. Weather disasters are on the rise, I can see it, even if the rest of you don't. You up there in CT are lucky, I live in the Tornado belt. Every major storm that comes through leaves me in fear for my life now. A tornado touched down only a few miles from me here just a few days ago. We are seeing more tornadoes and fiercer ones at that. We will also continue to see a greater frequency of mega disaster hurricanes. As the ocean heats up, these hurricanes will get more and more fierce. Eventually we may need a category 6 for hurricanes. Such hurricanes would wipe out all life in its path.

I don't know how many of you who are denying this issue have lived through tornadoes and hurricanes, but I have lived through both, near misses within visible distance tornadoes and I've lived through the eye of a hurricane. Unless you experience such a thing, you can't comprehend it.

We have just had the two hottest, most dry summers on record here in TN these last two years. It has been sheer hell living in the heat (as with most poor folks here, we do not have aircon, someone tried to help us with that issue, but the machine they gave us does not work).

I've slept in 130 degree heat, and let me tell you, it is inhuman (back when living in the desert with no cooling whatsoever). Generally, I would go through about 3 or 4 gallons of water a day just for perspiration. What is going to happen to the poor folks who still live where I did that also have no AC when temps go up higher? 130 will kill you, I thanked God when I got out of there!!!

I am sorry, I know I am NOT popular with my stance on this issue, but I know in my heart it IS the right stance. We are in serious danger. Just saying things haven't happened before doesn't make it not happen now. As for the ozone layer, it has been damaged and at times a huge gaping hole HAS existed over a large part of the planet.

If I am confronted with the requirement of making a choice on this issue between you you lay folks say or what the scientists at The Labs say where I used to work, guess who I am going to listen to? They have the real world knowledge and skills, and most of them are very conservative in personality, not the kind of people to yell "Alarm ALARM!", but they ARE yelling it now!

One only needs to read our more popular scientific journals, such as Scientific American, to learn the truth.

I agree that devastating the residents of the state or chasing away industry isn't too grand an idea, but that is where being smart and doing smart things with smart solutions comes in to play.

In Germany they enacted laws which made it much easier for people to go solar and wind, and it has proven wildly successful, I understand up to a third of energy production in Germany is or is about to be green, though my memory might be off a little on that one. There are farmers, land owners, and highway stretches filled with solar arrays and people are now making money, having paid off their solar arrays already, rather than costing them! It took will power and determination and vision, but in Germany it IS working.

Surely we are as good as the German people, no?
--
You know your life has gotten "DICEY" when it turns into an episode of LOST, like my ex wife, who I swear is one of "The Others". Cancer and other diseases kill fellow members here at DSLR! Easy: Join us in Teams Helix and Discovery to save the world!


gregamy

join:2003-05-22
Middletown, CT

reply to pandora
::Yawn::

Greg, who's installed solar panels (because they make economic sense), drives a 15 mpg diesel Excursion when necessary, and who's personally lived through:

- 3 tornadoes
- 5 hurricanes
- 2 earthquakes
- 1 drought
- 2 floods
- 3 major blizzards

...and is fully convinced that crying in fear in front of the TV network news and living in a cave with a candle for heat while hiding under the buffalo skin sheets is no way to "live". And, is throughly convinced that all folks like the above are flat-out mental, regardless of political, technical, or religious affiliation or where their "heart" is...and he becomes TRULY fearful when we start talking about giving up our rights, choices, opportunities based on Orwellian "consensus"...and knows that we're BETTER than the German people, that we actually think and make reasonable choices for ourselves, and thus we don't fall for this Chicken Little crap...

Hey, just sayin'...

pandora
Premium
join:2001-06-01
Outland
·Comcast

 reply to signmeuptoo
You are welcome to move to Connecticut and enjoy our crusade against CO2. My opinion is that higher taxes and fuel bills look better when viewed from Tennessee.
--
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use."


Glenn
I'D Rather Be Skiing
Premium
join:2000-10-05
Wallingford, CT

reply to signmeuptoo
said by signmeuptoo See Profile :

Surely we are as good as the German people, no?
"But mom, all my friends are doing it..."

"If all your friends jumped off a bridge, would you do the same?"


--
Legal ATVing in Connecticut?

mcevoys

join:2002-02-06
Ridgefield, CT
reply to signmeuptoo
>>The consensus at the labs

Concensus is *not* a scientific methodology.


signmeuptoo
Obama can save the economy Vision
Premium
join:2001-11-22
Tardis in TN
clubs:
reply to pandora
These scientists HAVE been using scientific methods. You all are in denial. And throwing insults at me just proves what kind of people, too.


disconnected

@snet.net

reply to Glenn
It's rather simple: I stopped trying to find any logical reason for this nation's self-destructive legislative choices. The answer is that environmentalists simply hate America, Capitalism, science and the betterment of mankind. They want to see us living in caves, once again. Only now, does "global warming" make sense.


gregamy

join:2003-05-22
Middletown, CT

reply to signmeuptoo
said by signmeuptoo See Profile :

...throwing insults at me just proves what kind of people [you are], too.
No point in getting offended. We're mostly attacking your silly ideas, not your personality. We don't think you're any more mental than, say, the guys that used to stand on the street corner with signs reading "Repent! The End of the World is Nigh!", for example.

Dude, know what's nice about the United States versus, say, your beloved socialist Germany? We're free people. We're free to believe what we want. Right or wrong, we can believe that the sky is pink and that daffodils come out of an opossum's butts, and probably not get a second glance.

And, it's even codified in the First Amendment to the United Stated Constitution: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." You are free to believe whatever religious fervor you want, without hassles from the government. But, guess what? So am I. If you want to worship on the alter of Mother Earth, have at it. If I want to worship on the alter of the "Supreme Being of Internal Combustion (Presented by Mobil 1)", I can.

But guess what, Part Two? Neither one of us has the right to mandate those beliefs on the other. And neither one of us has the right to be free of disagreement or ridicule from the other. You are free to come in to this topic and give us your opinion; we'll all read it. But don't expect us to accept it as our own gospel and change our evil ways.

I'm not going to debate the merits/dismerits of the Church of Global Warming; frankly, I don't care. I personally think you're bonkers and/or brainwashed, and if it really bothers you that a total stranger doesn't automatically believe what you believe, especially when that belief is filled with apocalyptic futures that will happen if we don't change our evil ways, then that's a pretty sure sign that it's a religion. And you're entitled to it. And I'm entitled to be free from it.

As long as you practice your religion in private and don't force it on me, I'm good with it. Have fun. But when you start cramming it in my face, mandating that I believe - or worse, start using the power of the government to force it upon me by taking away my free will to make my own informed decisions - NOW we gots a problem.

Try to convince me all you want, and you can sleep well knowing that someday you'll surely get to tell me "see, I told you so." But you've no right to take it any further than that... - GA

pandora
Premium
join:2001-06-01
Outland
·Comcast

  You bring up an interesting point, much of environmentalism as practiced in the U.S. is more of a religious faith based belief system than a scientific fact based belief system. I'd love to see someone challenge some of the pseudo science our kids are forced to learn in court.

My daughter was prevented from handing in a paper about global warming, indicating it was good in that Connecticut was once covered with glaciers and uninhabitable. Her teacher informed us in a letter that Connecticut was never covered with glaciers. This is the level of science we currently get in our public school system. To get a passing grade she had to write a report about how awful global warming is.
--
"People demand freedom of speech as a compensation for the freedom of thought which they seldom use."


signmeuptoo
Obama can save the economy Vision
Premium
join:2001-11-22
Tardis in TN
clubs:
·EarthLink
·Earthlink Cable Mo..
·Packet8
·AT&T Southeast

reply to gregamy
said by gregamy See Profile :

said by signmeuptoo See Profile :

...throwing insults at me just proves what kind of people [you are], too.
No point in getting offended. We're mostly attacking your silly ideas, not your personality. We don't think you're any more mental than, say, the guys that used to stand on the street corner with signs reading "Repent! The End of the World is Nigh!", for example.

Dude, know what's nice about the United States versus, say, your beloved socialist Germany? We're free people. We're free to believe what we want. Right or wrong, we can believe that the sky is pink and that daffodils come out of an opossum's butts, and probably not get a second glance.

And, it's even codified in the First Amendment to the United Stated Constitution: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof..." You are free to believe whatever religious fervor you want, without hassles from the government. But, guess what? So am I. If you want to worship on the alter of Mother Earth, have at it. If I want to worship on the alter of the "Supreme Being of Internal Combustion (Presented by Mobil 1)", I can.

But guess what, Part Two? Neither one of us has the right to mandate those beliefs on the other. And neither one of us has the right to be free of disagreement or ridicule from the other. You are free to come in to this topic and give us your opinion; we'll all read it. But don't expect us to accept it as our own gospel and change our evil ways.

I'm not going to debate the merits/dismerits of the Church of Global Warming; frankly, I don't care. I personally think you're bonkers and/or brainwashed, and if it really bothers you that a total stranger doesn't automatically believe what you believe, especially when that belief is filled with apocalyptic futures that will happen if we don't change our evil ways, then that's a pretty sure sign that it's a religion. And you're entitled to it. And I'm entitled to be free from it.

As long as you practice your religion in private and don't force it on me, I'm good with it. Have fun. But when you start cramming it in my face, mandating that I believe - or worse, start using the power of the government to force it upon me by taking away my free will to make my own informed decisions - NOW we gots a problem.

Try to convince me all you want, and you can sleep well knowing that someday you'll surely get to tell me "see, I told you so." But you've no right to take it any further than that... - GA
That's quite a rant without ANY scientific or rational content, but that's ok. The massive majority of the world's scientists know better than you guys, and guess who I am going to listen to. I have read and watched my share on the topic, so you guys are just dead wrong. But as is typical with extreme conservatives, you can't handle someone disagreeing with you and stoop to being mean and ugly. Rush Limbaugh, the loud mouthed, insulting, drug addict is a perfect example. He's perfectly ignorant and flaunts it.

The sad thing is you guys won't pay the price, but your children's children will...
--
You know your life has gotten "DICEY" when it turns into an episode of LOST, like my ex wife, who I swear is one of "The Others". Cancer and other diseases kill fellow members here at DSLR! Easy: Join us in Teams Helix and Discovery to save the world!


billh491

join:2001-08-09
Pomfret Center, CT
reply to pandora
5,000 feet of ice sat on our state 15,000 years ago now THAT's global warming! Those cavemen's camp fires I guess caused them to melt.
Forums » Tech and Talk » City Chat » Connecticut ChatWeee new train cars coming along nice! »
page: 1 · 2 · 3


Tuesday, 07-Oct 20:34:27 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [123] It's Cable TV Rate Hike Season
· [69] Half Of New iPhone Owners Came From Verizon
· [68] Wholesale Bandwidth Prices Still Dropping
· [62] Supreme Court TiVo/Echostar Ruling
· [58] XOHM Online In Additional Launch Markets
· [54] AT&T Kills Off $20 Unlimited Pre-Paid Data
· [32] Customers Still Annoyed By FiOS Billing
· [23] Verizon Says Alltel Deal On Schedule
· [22] Verizon Pushes Toward a 100Gbps Core
· [22] Portland Lets Wi-Fi Network Rust
Most people now reading
· KFC 10.00 challenge [General Questions]
· Acronis True Image Home 2009 Final Released! [Software]
· Valvoline put 5w20 in my camry! [Automotive]
· new speeds? [Comcast HSI]
· Texas Realignment Thread - 10/6 [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Heads up; Usenet, "Rarpassgen.exe" virus [TekSavvy]
· [Connectivity] Abuse email again [Comcast HSI]
· IMG 1.6 Build 06.89 Released [Verizon FIOS TV]
· [E-mail] Comcast E mail acting up! [Comcast HSI]