Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Cable Support » RCN » [E-Mail] SMTP.rcn.com silently not relaying, again
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
[Connectivity] Weirdness in the Lehigh Valley »
« [Speed] Washington DC - Speed is quite slow past week or two  
AuthorAll Replies


jsolo1
Premium
join:2001-07-01
reply to NormanS
Re: [E-Mail] SMTP.rcn.com silently not relaying, again

Perhaps if all servers required authentication, port 25 could be left open. No credentials, no smtp.
--
Insanity is living in a state of disillusion.

negativeduck
Premium,VIP
join:2002-02-14
Centreville, VA

You can infact relay mail from any mail-client as user@anydomain.com through smtp.rcn.com. Case by Case restrictions to this may be imposed as result of a compromised computer or host although in several of those cases enabling smtp auth will correct this.

If you are having a trouble sending email with your "From" setup as something other than rcn.com I would suggest enabling smtp auth and seeing if that helps with your problem.

We process a tone of email with customers doing just this scenerio so there is a possibility of specific 'one off' spam domains and what not. That being said if you want to message me some details around one of these 'dropped' emails we can research into where your mail is going.
--
Bryan Laird
Director Product and Technology

NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC

reply to jsolo1
said by jsolo1 See Profile :

Perhaps if all servers required authentication, port 25 could be left open. No credentials, no smtp.
How would your email service relay agents move email if they were required to authenticate the connection? The basic idea is to separate message submission (which may require authentication) from mail transfer (which should not require authentication).
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum


jsolo1
Premium
join:2001-07-01

Norman good point. My response was based on email submission, not transmission. You do bring up a good point though. Not sure how that would work. I imagine there may be a white list of sorts?
--
Insanity is living in a state of disillusion.

negativeduck
Premium,VIP
join:2002-02-14
Centreville, VA


edit:
May 13th, @05:46PM

Several mail hosts will not accept unauthenticated delivery requests from hosts that are NOT known isp's, or rather they specifically 'reject' or do not allow communication from a host that "appears" to be a dynamic IP pool connecting to their mail exchangers.. now this is a different scenario than say 'smtp' servers while fundamentally they same they like to serve different purposes.

IE if you run your own mail-server on a standard dynamically allocated IP there is a strong chance that you will never be able to deliver your email to alot of hosts. This is where smart-hosting and smart-relaying come in where you transfer your mail to a larger ISP for delivery to another large entity.
--
Bryan Laird
Director Product and Technology

NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC

reply to jsolo1
Or read RFC 2476. That is the officially designated message submission port. Also, as a de facto standard, SMTPS (SMTP w/SSL) uses port 465.

Also read RFC 2821. SMTP does not require port 25, except for mail transfer.

If all E-mail Service Providers moved message submission to either the designated message submission port (RFC 2476), or even just any other port than port 25, it would be possible to reserve port 25 for mail transfer. Each gateway mail server can then decided for itself if a connecting mail host is trustworthy (allow), or not (deny).
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum
Forums » US Cable Support » RCN[Connectivity] Weirdness in the Lehigh Valley »
« [Speed] Washington DC - Speed is quite slow past week or two  


Saturday, 22-Nov 18:42:24 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 9 years online! © 1999-2008 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [199] Obama FCC Selection Team Won't Make AT&T Happy
· [109] DSL's Not Dead Yet
· [87] Zone Alarm Pro Free Just For Today
· [84] Storm Reviews Come Rolling In
· [80] Harvard Law Professor Sues RIAA
· [69] New Xbox 360 'Experience' Goes Live
· [69] CRTC Rules Against Indie ISPs In Throttling Dispute
· [59] Just 26% of U.S. Broadband Users Faster Than 5Mbps
· [56] Friday Open Thread
· [51] Cable Grabbing 71% Of New Broadband Customers
Most people now reading
· CRTC ruling coming Thursday Nov 20 [TekSavvy]
· Pentagon Hit by Unprecedented Cyber Attack [Security]
· [WotLK] Championing explained [World of Warcraft]
· Disabling Autorun in XP? [Security]
· Local Regulations/Code for Running Cat5e? [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [video] Chicken Head Tracking [56k lookout! (broadband heavy)]
· Rocky - time to offer VPN service to all your customers [TekSavvy]
· Is there any point now in switching? [TekSavvy]
· Things to give up if we're capped [TekSavvy]
· [ PvE] Leatherworking [World of Warcraft]