Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Sorry Qwest, 'Next Generation' Broadband Isn't 896kbps Upstream » If only user desire trumped engineering obstacles...
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Only pirates... »
AuthorAll Replies


espaeth
Digital Plumber
Premium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
·voip.ms
·Vitelity VOIP
·Callcentric
·VoiceStick
·ViaTalk
·Comcast
·Embarq

reply to Karl Bode
Re: If only user desire trumped engineering obstacles...

said by Karl Bode See Profile :

Yeah, if only there were a technology that offered faster upstream speeds!
Name a technology that Qwest could deploy at the same or lower costs than their FTTN ADSL2+ offering that would allow those faster upstream speeds.

vortex91

join:2000-08-18
Glendale, CA
oh gee FTTH?


Karl Bode
News Guy
join:2000-03-02
reply to espaeth
Juice boosted carrier pigeon?


espaeth
Digital Plumber
Premium,MVM
join:2001-04-21
Minneapolis, MN
·voip.ms
·Vitelity VOIP
·Callcentric
·VoiceStick
·ViaTalk
·Comcast
·Embarq

reply to vortex91
said by vortex91 See Profile :

oh gee FTTH?
*sigh* An FTTH deployment would not be the same or lower cost to that of their FTTN deployment.


maartena
Stacked.
Premium
join:2002-05-10
Orange, CA
·RoadRunner Cable

reply to espaeth
said by espaeth See Profile :

said by Karl Bode See Profile :

Yeah, if only there were a technology that offered faster upstream speeds!
Name a technology that Qwest could deploy at the same or lower costs than their FTTN ADSL2+ offering that would allow those faster upstream speeds.
None. That's why I stick with Cable, because they can.

EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA

reply to espaeth
said by espaeth See Profile :

said by Karl Bode See Profile :

Yeah, if only there were a technology that offered faster upstream speeds!
Name a technology that Qwest could deploy at the same or lower costs than their FTTN ADSL2+ offering that would allow those faster upstream speeds.
Yes, Qwest shouldn't have to spend MORE money! God, how dare some suggest that they may be better off with a more expensive choice- haven't those unlucky enough to hold shares in Q suffered enough?

Qwest dug themselves into this pit with all their debt, but now I don't really see how they can do anything else- they simply don't have the capability to make huge expensive deployments like telecom mega-conglomerates VZ and T.

patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY

reply to espaeth
said by espaeth See Profile :

said by Karl Bode See Profile :

Yeah, if only there were a technology that offered faster upstream speeds!
Name a technology that Qwest could deploy at the same or lower costs than their FTTN ADSL2+ offering that would allow those faster upstream speeds.
LMDS wireless to the home from the RT?

veldy

join:1999-08-04
Minneapolis, MN
·VoicePulse
·Comcast
·callwithus
·ViaTalk
·Callcentric
·Vonage

reply to maartena
said by maartena See Profile :

None. That's why I stick with Cable, because they can.
But the cable companies are getting greedy and really pushing traffic shaping appliances and content sniffers as well as talking about real caps on total data transfer. So far, the DSL telcos have stayed out of that.

I have Comcast now and have already been victimized by port blocking and traffic shaping and it is getting to be a battle that requires work arounds that cost additional dollars. I am getting the QWest 20Mbps soon and will compare them side by side and for a week or two and then stick with one or the other. If I choose Qwest, I WILL miss the 2Mbps upload link that Comcast offers as uploading my pictures for printing [I am an amateur photographer], and doing file transfers to work will take more than twice as long
Forums » Sorry Qwest, 'Next Generation' Broadband Isn't 896kbps UpstreamOnly pirates... »


Friday, 27-Nov 11:41:47 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [116] Time Warner Cable Fires Broadside At Broadcasters
· [109] New AT&T Ad Campaign Hits Back At Verizon
· [95] Apple Joins AT&T Verizon Snark Fest
· [87] New Bill Takes Aim At Higher Verizon ETFs
· [70] TiVo Sees Record Customer Losses
· [68] In-Flight Internet Headed For Bumpy Landing?
· [59] Thanksgiving Open Thread
· [38] EFF Wages War On Fine Print
· [38] ICANN Slams DNS Redirection
· [36] Senators Want ACTA Made Public
Most people now reading
· Newegg Black Friday Sale started [Users Find Hot Deals]
· SSD [Computer Hardware Discussion/Reviews]
· Only firefox accesses Internet? [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Bell Response to PIPEDA Request [TekSavvy]
· So we need a legitimate reason to use a lot of bandwidth? [TekSavvy]
· Whats the big deal about being "Old School"....? [World of Warcraft]
· Not strictly "Home" related - but WOW anyways... [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]