Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » O Canada! » Canadian » Canadian Broadband » Acanac
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
Class Action Lawsuit against CIA/3Web/IGS »
« ST516 upgrade 7.4.4.7  
AuthorAll Replies
-


CanerisErik
Caneris
Premium,VIP
join:2007-10-03
Toronto, ON


1 edit
reply to djweis
Re: Acanac

said by djweis See Profile :

said by CanerisErik See Profile :

said by Guspaz See Profile :

On the other hand, I guess building your own remotes would be easier as a group.
*IF* the CRTC forces Bell to allow placing remote xSLAMs just like the Stingers Bell puts on the side of their OPIs.
We have something in the US called a field connection point as well as remote collocation. With the field connection point you physically place a cabinet or other DSLAM near the FDI (cross connect) in remote areas and pay the LEC a large amount of money to connect in a cable you provide to the cross connect field in the box.
We've done 5 of them with Qwest with pretty good success. Some are fed with multiple T1's and a couple are fed with fiber.
I don't see a wholesale/CLEC portion of www.bell.ca so I can't say for sure if that's available but it would be an option if it was. It only made sense for us in business parks that didn't have any ILEC DSL available.
AFAIK, we don't have anything like that, despite the fact that an ever increasing number of loops is served from remotes (well over 50% in certain bands now). Bell will always find excuses and nonsense to feed the CRTC to prevent CLECs and DSLSPs from accessing remotes.

Just look at the past five years.
Here's a perfect example of their blatant disregard for their ILEC obligations and CRTC, from three years ago: »www.crtc.gc.ca/PartVII/eng/2005/···0497.htm

BS seems familiar?

djweis

join:2006-04-02
West Des Moines, IA

reply to CanerisErik
said by CanerisErik See Profile :

said by Guspaz See Profile :

On the other hand, I guess building your own remotes would be easier as a group.
*IF* the CRTC forces Bell to allow placing remote xSLAMs just like the Stingers Bell puts on the side of their OPIs.
We have something in the US called a field connection point as well as remote collocation. With the field connection point you physically place a cabinet or other DSLAM near the FDI (cross connect) in remote areas and pay the LEC a large amount of money to connect in a cable you provide to the cross connect field in the box.
We've done 5 of them with Qwest with pretty good success. Some are fed with multiple T1's and a couple are fed with fiber.
I don't see a wholesale/CLEC portion of www.bell.ca so I can't say for sure if that's available but it would be an option if it was. It only made sense for us in business parks that didn't have any ILEC DSL available.

beamer69

join:2007-05-10
Burnaby, BC

reply to Acanac Inc
said by Acanac Inc See Profile :

Forming an alliance in my opinion is the only real longer term solution.
While still fighting Bell against these actions in the hope at some point the last mile is broken off from the rest of Bell so everyone is treated equally.

Right now all they are doing is moving the restrictions they have on Sympatico to wholesalers

Keep fighting Paul this is really a joke what they are doing. Well wish it was a joke but it is not


Acanac Inc
Premium
join:2007-03-05
Mississauga, ON
reply to CanerisErik
Forming an alliance in my opinion is the only real longer term solution. We need to make Bell think twice before they come up with these ridiculous ideas. The only way to do this is to offer real compationtion.


CanerisErik
Caneris
Premium,VIP
join:2007-10-03
Toronto, ON

reply to Guspaz
said by Guspaz See Profile :

On the other hand, I guess building your own remotes would be easier as a group.
*IF* the CRTC forces Bell to allow placing remote xSLAMs just like the Stingers Bell puts on the side of their OPIs.
Forums » O Canada! » Canadian » Canadian BroadbandClass Action Lawsuit against CIA/3Web/IGS »
« ST516 upgrade 7.4.4.7  


Wednesday, 09-Dec 10:48:29 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [197] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [81] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [62] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [56] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [50] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
· [47] Site Leaks Yahoo, Verizon Fed Data Share Pricing
· [44] Microwaving Your Innards Is Not 'Extreme'
· [39] Verizon LTE: 5-12 Mbps Downstream
· [30] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
Most people now reading
· Comcast refused to install 400' feet. [Comcast HSI]
· Is sleeping similar to being dead? [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· New PvE Content [World of Warcraft]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· HOA Headaches [General Questions]
· Buzzing whatchamacallit in ceiling...?? Help identify. [Home Repair & Improvement]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]
· So what addons will likely not work... [World of Warcraft]