|
 MrShag
join:2006-07-09 Hamilton, ON | Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling get yur bribes..er donations in! | |
|
 |   yuppers
@videotron.ca
| Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling CAIP's lobby person should have by now paid the CRTC donated a few hookers, unlimited booze, unlimited food in the best restaurants, and a vacation chalet in the south of france on a vineyard to cover "expenses".
If not, well we know how this will end already. | |
|
 DabberDan
join:2004-11-15 Gatineau, ON
·TekSavvy Solutions..
1 edit | Here's to no tricks and only treating on Oct 31st...
I just looked at my calendar as I was adding the date on it, this is on a Friday (probably will be done late in the day too).
They'll have a buffer of two days for whatever decision they take. Chickens. | |
|
  HiVolt 30 Premium join:2000-12-28 Toronto, ON clubs: | My god, October 31st???!!! That's ridiculous. -- ,,!,,('-'),,!,, | |
|
 |   Turbinator
join:2007-10-14 Mississauga, ON
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling said by HiVolt :My god, October 31st???!!! That's ridiculous. I don't understand why they didn't choose December 31, it only makes sense. | |
|
 |  |   Stewy Premium join:2007-12-12 Kitchener, ON
| Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling said by Turbinator :I don't understand why they didn't choose December 31, it only makes sense. Imagine if they would have chosen April 1st that would really have been a riot.
After viewing the big picture my money is on Bell winning this thing hands down, they will also win the bandwidth cap no problem.
Power does what it wants. | |
|
  The Flash You don't win friends with salad Premium join:2002-10-17 Toronto, ON | Trick or Treat Smell my Feet Give Me Something Good to Eat | |
|
 |  MrShag
join:2006-07-09 Hamilton, ON | Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling mmmm Bananas and timbits?? | |
|
 |
  bryanviper
join:2002-10-12 Toronto, CAN | we need somebody on the inside to find out whats really going on in there. I say we get rocky to get a job in there so he can kick some ass! | |
|
 |  DabberDan
join:2004-11-15 Gatineau, ON
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling said by bryanviper :we need somebody on the inside to find out whats really going on in there. I say we get rocky to get a job in there so he can kick some ass! Where's wikileaks when you need 'em ?  | |
|
  oh LOOK
@videotron.ca
| Keep in mind this is only a "proposed" date. It can drag on. Bell can centainly add more fule to this to make it drag on.
Also, there has to be another battle coming to prevent teksavvy from turning into a mini-bell.
So this is just a proposed date for round one.
As for round two (the mini-bell fight), nothing has been submitted to the CRTC yet, if there will be.
Lawyer bills are racking up. | |
|
  anon149
@vaxination.ca
| Bell must have booked golf rounds until the end of september to play golf with CRTC employees, which means they can't start working on the issue until after golfing season.
The really sad part about this is that Bell is probably buying golf rounds at charitable tournaments and as a result, get to have "charitable donation" status in its tax filings for its lobbying efforts.
Also, Bell wants to make sure all key politicians are back in town so it can wine and dine them to ensure they apply pressure to the CRTC for a proper resolution of the matter in Bell's favour.
As far as CAIP is concerned, I don't expect anything from them. My guess is that they are hoping the CRTC will be "nice" and rule in their favour.
If CAIP had taken out full page ads in major newspapers to explain what Bell is doing (factually), the public uproar would be such that Harper would tell the CRTC to rule on this ASAP, and make sure public opinion is satisfied.
Prentice got involved in the SMS thing because this was widely known by the public. He didn't get involved in the throttling because it was just a small bunch of geeks who got mad about it.
CAIP needs to learn, hopefully before Oct 31, that the CRTC isn't "nice", it doesn't rule for the right thing, it implements government policies, and unless there is a really massive uproar from the *general public*, the governmnet will want Bell to be succesfull.
Remember that Bell has a lot of negotiating power at this point in time. "If you let us keep the throttling, we'll lay off 1000 fewer employess come December 11th when we go private and never again have to report to anyone what we are doing".
The fact that Bell got the CRTC to delay this measn that they are waiting for the public to forget about this issue so that the CRTC won't have the public's opinion in mind when it rules in favour of Bell. | |
|
 |   Arbalister
join:2007-11-24 St Catharines, ON
·TekSavvy Solutions..
| Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling said by anon149 :
The fact that Bell got the CRTC to delay this measn that they are waiting for the public to forget about this issue so that the CRTC won't have the public's opinion in mind when it rules in favour of Bell. Delay?
You seem to have an overblown idea of how long it takes the CRTC to move on anything. Oct 31 is hardly delayed, in fact I'd put them well ahead fo schedule if they come up with a decision by then. Why, that's only 7 months from the date of filing. They've barely had time to talk about it. | |
|
 |  |  recneps
join:2006-06-24 Whitby, ON
| Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling said by Arbalister :said by anon149 :
The fact that Bell got the CRTC to delay this measn that they are waiting for the public to forget about this issue so that the CRTC won't have the public's opinion in mind when it rules in favour of Bell. Delay? You seem to have an overblown idea of how long it takes the CRTC to move on anything. Oct 31 is hardly delayed, in fact I'd put them well ahead fo schedule if they come up with a decision by then. Why, that's only 7 months from the date of filing. They've barely had time to talk about it. Yeah, this is a government organization we're talking about here... 3-4 months is like next-day for an ordinary organization. | |
|
 |  |   anone149
@vaxination.ca
| > Delay ?
CRTC originally promised a ruling by mid-september.
Since the CRTC wasn't going to start working on this until the end of august after vacation, the delays in the filings are not the real reason for this delay in CRTC rendering a decision.
The fact that the CRTC decided that CAIP members were not harmed by Bell's DPI equipment (the may 15th injunction ruling) is probably a good indication of where they are heading. It is just a question of properly managing public perception so that there are no public backlashes.
HINT to CAIP: public opinion is the only thing that can force the CRTC to side with us, and remaining silent between now and the CRTC decision will ensure the CRTC can side with bell without any public opinion backlash. They don't car about a few hundred geeks. Media will have a 15 second report on it and will move on on oct 31.
(especially since the liberals aren't interested, the Reform party knows this isn't an important issue and donations from Bell is more important than votes from a few hundred geeks). | |
|
 |  |  |   Guspaz Guspaz Premium,MVM join:2001-11-05 Montreal, QC
·Colbanet
| Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling JF: The ruling is likely delayed because various things delayed the process with involved parties. If they were originally intending to rule at the end of September, they may have simply decided to delay a month due to the delays in the overall procedure.
The CRTC did not decide that CAIP members were not harmed by Bell's practices. You're basically completely wrong on that count. They merely decided that they had not suffered IRREPARABLE harm. That is, harm that cannot be compensated for monetarily. And since you can attach a dollar value to everything from lost business to increased customer service costs to inability to effectively utilize/plan AHSSPI links, that makes sense; the CRTC's requirements are far too strict. | |
|
 k6richar
join:2008-06-17 Kitchener, ON | If the CRTC sides with bell does teksavvy have some backup plans to fight bell? Perhaps an anti competative lawsuit or something? | |
|
 |
 |
  j3richo
join:2007-12-08 Gatineau, QC | damn it, that's an entire month more than what was expected! | |
|
 beamer69
join:2007-05-10 Burnaby, BC
| quote: The modern holiday of Halloween has its origins in the ancient Celtic festival known as Samhain (Irish pronunciation: [ˈsˠaunʲ]; from the Old Irish samain).[2] The festival of Samhain is a celebration of the end of the harvest season in Gaelic culture, and is sometimes [3] regarded as the "Celtic New Year".[4] Traditionally, the festival was a time used by the ancient pagans to take stock of supplies and slaughter livestock for winter stores. The ancient Gaels believed that on October 31, the boundary between the alive and the deceased dissolved, and the dead become dangerous for the living by causing problems such as sickness or damaged crops. The festivals would frequently involve bonfires, where the bones of slaughtered livestock were thrown. Costumes and masks were also worn at the festivals in an attempt to mimic the evil spirits or placate them.
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halloween
quote: The modern holiday of Belloween has its origins in the ancient CRTC rulings. Traditionally, the festival was a time used by ancient Bell to take stock of supplies and slaughter wholesalers for winter stores. The ancient Bell believed that on October 31, the boundary between the alive and the deceased dissolved, and Bell became dangerous for people by causing problems such as throttling or damaging the internet. The festivals would frequently involve DPI boxes, where the TCP packets of slaughtered torrents were thrown. Fudged numbers and false statistics were also thrown at the CRTC in an attempt to mimic the truth and placate the public.
I guess this year it will be Belloween on Oct 31 | |
|
 |   drjp81
join:2006-01-09 canada | Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling Love it! -- Cheers! | |
|
 |  |  |
 |  |  |  |
 jerrycan
join:2008-04-03 Kitchener, ON | The Internet sucks. Back to Fidonet for me. RUFF! | |
|
 k6richar
join:2008-06-17 Kitchener, ON | october 31st news stations will be covering halloween basicly the general public will never hear about it i keep hearing rumours about a fall election hopefully we could make net neutrality an election issue | |
|
 |  Kyolux
join:2008-04-24 | Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling rumors for next season elections have been going on for almost or more then a year already. | |
|
 |
 |   anon149
@vaxination.ca
| Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling >I think I know why the CRTC has delayed their ruling. They >have been too busy looking at the new porn channel. >http://www.canada.com/windsorstar/story.html?id=36aa16ff-aee4-4cd1-9dd6-83a720dd73c8
What do they mean when they talk about 50% canadian content ?
The boys are canadian and the girls are foreign ? The actors have a canadian father and a foreign mother ?
Will the condoms used in the movies be made in canada, complete with a red canadian flag and a logo of a beaver on them ?
More importantly, will the movies be set in Canada, or just shot in Canada but with US flags and US postal boxes on streets with US license plates on cars to make it appear to be in the USA ?
Never thought of Edmonton as a porn production place. I wonder if they will be able to shoot some movies at West Edmonton Mall ?  | |
|
 |
  bhahahaha
@teksavvy.com
| The copyright won't pass. As soon as an election is called all the pending bills will die. They will call the election long before Oct 31st.
BUT that is also a bad thing. Once an election is called all the depts are told no major announcements which may include the CRTC. | |
|
 |  NCRGuy
join:2008-03-03 Ottawa, ON
| Re: CRTC says Oct. 31 will be the ruling said by bhahahaha :
The copyright won't pass. As soon as an election is called all the pending bills will die. They will call the election long before Oct 31st.
BUT that is also a bad thing. Once an election is called all the depts are told no major announcements which may include the CRTC. It won't include the CRTC. As an administrative tribunal they decide on their own when to hand down rulings. | |
|
 |
|
 |