republican-creole
Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Fight Brews Over FCC's Plan For Smut-Free National Wireless » Free WiFi would look like this
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
Savvy 5 year olds? »
« Snowball's chance...  
AuthorAll Replies

bbenso1

join:2004-11-28
Baltimore, MD

reply to Matt
Re: Free WiFi would look like this

said by Matt See Profile :

said by bbenso1 See Profile :

said by TKJunkMail See Profile :

So what M2Z is asking for is FREE spectrum so they can sell their 3 mbps tier at $30/mo that can show porn.
Not FREE. M2Z would pay the government 5% of their revenue. So instead of getting one payment up front the government would be getting recurring revenue as long as the company stays in business.
Yes free. If they don't make money (or use creative accounting to hide it) they don't pay the Government a dime.
Incorrect. 5% of REVENUE, not 5% of PROFIT. If they bring in $1 million and have operating costs of $2 million they would still owe the government 5% of that $1 million even though they actually made no money.

So, the only way that the government would see no money from this deal would be if M2Z had absolutely zero income. If that were the case I can guarantee that the company wouldn't be around for long and then the government would get their spectrum back.


Matt
Take me down to the paradise city
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
·North State Commun..

said by bbenso1 See Profile :

Incorrect. 5% of REVENUE, not 5% of PROFIT. If they bring in $1 million and have operating costs of $2 million they would still owe the government 5% of that $1 million even though they actually made no money.

So, the only way that the government would see no money from this deal would be if M2Z had absolutely zero income. If that were the case I can guarantee that the company wouldn't be around for long and then the government would get their spectrum back.
Did you read the filing? This only applies to their "Premium Offering" subscription service. And they "may" offer it. It doesn't say they HAVE to. They can plaster the free service ads or any number of creative schemes to make money that is exempt and never offer a premium service.
-
Forums » Fight Brews Over FCC's Plan For Smut-Free National WirelessSavvy 5 year olds? »
« Snowball's chance...  


Saturday, 05-Dec 06:16:11 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [90] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [83] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [75] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for 3.1 [World of Warcraft]
· Google takes aim at browser redirection [Security]
· Connecting to Google Voice Via SIP [VOIP Tech Chat]