how-to block ads
|
probboy
join:2008-01-10
Natick, MA
| reply to thevorpal
Re: Learn To Behave
said by thevorpal  :Well, what would happen if everyone on the plane decided to stream video? The real question here should be what sort of restriction on the packets we use on the aircraft, not the services that generate them. A reasonable restriction would be to give us a service-agnostic limit to follow. Why is it OK for American Airlines to throttle your connection or implement caps but it's not OK for Comcast, AT&T, et al? I'm paying for the service, I should be able to use it for whatever I want. It's my god-given right. What if I want to download 3TBs of Linux distros on my cross-country flight, or stream Netflix, or...
All the above was written in jest. | |
person300
@comcast.net
| said by probboy :said by thevorpal :Well, what would happen if everyone on the plane decided to stream video? The real question here should be what sort of restriction on the packets we use on the aircraft, not the services that generate them. A reasonable restriction would be to give us a service-agnostic limit to follow. Why is it OK for American Airlines to throttle your connection or implement caps but it's not OK for Comcast, AT&T, et al? I'm paying for the service, I should be able to use it for whatever I want. It's my god-given right. What if I want to download 3TBs of Linux distros on my cross-country flight, or stream Netflix, or... All the above was written in jest. Very different. People talking loudly over the phone are annoying on a plane. You are sharing space on a plane. You are not in your home and therefore must take in mind other people's attitudes about your actions. If this service is in your own home then yes, it is intolerable and an outrage that the service provider would block it. The feature as explained in the article is blocked to prevent excessive noise and annoyance to other customers who share the flight. In your own home you do not have to care or be concerned about what others think of you loudly talking on a phone. THAT is the difference. Just like if you rent an apartment and share it with others college friends, you usually have to set some basic rules that everyone must follow. AKA, clean up after yourself. If it is your own home you can throw the soda and food crumbs all over the floor if you like. | |
Maynard G Krebs
@teksavvy.com
| said by person300 :said by probboy :said by thevorpal :Well, what would happen if everyone on the plane decided to stream video? The real question here should be what sort of restriction on the packets we use on the aircraft, not the services that generate them. ...... Why is it OK for American Airlines to throttle your connection or implement caps but it's not OK for Comcast, AT&T, et al? I'm paying for the service, I should be able to use it for whatever I want. ...... Very different. People talking loudly over the phone are annoying on a plane. You are sharing space on a plane. You are not in your home and therefore must take in mind other people's attitudes about your actions. ...... It's absolutely no different than sitting in a food court under a tall office building or at the local mall where *everyone* is talking on a cellphone while choking down a burger and fries. The fact that you're traveling at 1000 Kph while talking has nothing to do with it.
The airlines have turned the aircraft into a flying food court already, nickel and dime-ing you for food, snacks, and beverages - so why shouldn't we treat it as such and talk while we fly?
The airlines are only going to block VOIP to preserve what little revenue stream they get from the phones they've mounted on seatbacks. Nobody complains when you use those phones. | |
person300
@comcast.net
| said by Maynard G Krebs :
It's absolutely no different than sitting in a food court under a tall office building or at the local mall where *everyone* is talking on a cellphone while choking down a burger and fries. The fact that you're traveling at 1000 Kph while talking has nothing to do with it.
The airlines have turned the aircraft into a flying food court already, nickel and dime-ing you for food, snacks, and beverages - so why shouldn't we treat it as such and talk while we fly?
The airlines are only going to block VOIP to preserve what little revenue stream they get from the phones they've mounted on seatbacks. Nobody complains when you use those phones.
Well, I have not seeing much eating and extreme chatting on a plane usually. Do not know what airline you use. I also do not know if you have traveled on long flights over 10 hrs. When I went to Hawaii on late flight I enjoyed getting some sleep during the night but I guess that is abnormal and I should want loud chatter on the flight to not let me get some shut eye. It is just a courteous thing to do and have on a plane, especially on long flights. Next you will be telling me to get my own plane to enjoy some quiet. Most people can't afford that sorry. There is also no need to be chatting on a phone on a plane. If you need to contact someone about a detail use the web service and send them an e-mail and help preserve the quiet. | |
aciddrink
join:2000-08-26
Kailua, HI
 ·Hawaiian Telcom
| reply to Maynard G Krebs
said by Maynard G Krebs :
It's absolutely no different than sitting in a food court under a tall office building or at the local mall where *everyone* is talking on a cellphone while choking down a burger and fries. The fact that you're traveling at 1000 Kph while talking has nothing to do with it.
I completely disagree with your statement here. It is absolutely different than sitting in a food court. In a food court if you don't appreciate the person next to you talking loudly into their phone, get up and move. In an airplane if you don't like the person next to you talking on their phone... tough shit you're stuck for 7 more hours. I fly from Hawaii to the mainland several times per year, a long flight next to a loud person is just torture. Whether it be snoring, crying, coughing, sneezing, or loud conversations...its simply annoying. | |
-
|
