Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » AT&T Thanks Democrats For Telecom Immunity » AT&T ,,, your money, delivered to the fund raisers
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
"a slew of private corporate-sponsored parties" »
« Teh Two-Party system  
AuthorAll Replies


Alvin

@qwest.net

reply to NormanS
Re: AT&T ,,, your money, delivered to the fund raisers

The question of whether AT&T did something illegal isn't the point. The fact that Congress and the President granted them immunity and prevented the courts doing their job in determining whether or not they did something illegal is the problem.

And in the greatest irony, it was the 14th amendment, through the Supreme Court and cases brought to it (over 80% of which were about corporations, not freed slaves) was the one that ultimately allowed Corporations to be defined as people and gave them the right to own property and have free speech leading to this problem with lobbyists and corporate domination in the first place.

Now they're able to use their pull to avoid responsibility.


amigo_boy

join:2005-07-22
Tempe, AZ
·Cox HSI
·magicjack.com

said by Alvin :

The question of whether AT&T did something illegal isn't the point. The fact that Congress and the President granted them immunity and prevented the courts doing their job in determining whether or not they did something illegal is the problem.
You're wrong. Congress and the President did nothing more than restate 18 U.S.C. 2511(2)(a)(ii)(B) [1]. That law already defines when telcos are (or are not) liable to criminal or civil prosecution.

So, the so-called immunity deal [2] didn't convey immunity. It says its only applicable *if* 2511 applies. All it did was provide an avenue for the judiciary to make that determination.

We know this was the basis of the Administration's defense of the telcos because AG Gonzalez documented his argument that 2511 applies.[3]

[1] »www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html···00-.html

[2] »www.eff.org/files/filenode/att/F···_xml.pdf (see page 88)

[3] »www.usdoj.gov/opa/whitepaperonns···ties.pdf (see page 23).
-
Forums » AT&T Thanks Democrats For Telecom Immunity"a slew of private corporate-sponsored parties" »
« Teh Two-Party system  


Sunday, 06-Dec 12:58:27 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [136] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [128] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [105] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [82] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [81] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [75] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Is there any true cure for, or way to prevent, a hangover? [General Questions]
· Problems with rlslog.net? [TekSavvy]
· Bulb for garage door opener [Home Repair & Improvement]
· [DNS] Google's public DNS... performance increases? [Comcast HSI]
· How fast is your upstream internet connection? [General Questions]
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Is Usenet targettable under ACTA? [TekSavvy]