Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Security » Proxy used in Palin hack?
Search Topic:
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
please help me, i have problem with my PC »
« (topic move) Choosing a video card  
AuthorAll Replies

SUMware
Premium
join:2002-05-21


2 edits
reply to Just Basics
Little or No Jail Time Likely for Palin Hacker

From Wired
September 19, 2008 -
quote:
It might seem obvious to most people that the hacker who gained unauthorized access to the private e-mail account of Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin violated the Stored Communications Act.

Under that law, a violation is committed by anyone who “(1) intentionally accesses without authorization a facility through which an electronic communication service is provided;” or “(2) intentionally exceeds an authorization to access that facility; and thereby obtains...[an] electronic communication while it is in electronic storage in such system.”

But Kurt Opsahl, senior staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, says not so fast.

Although the law seems clear on such a matter, the Department of Justice has taken a position on the law that could thwart its own prosecution of the hack under the SCA.

Before anyone jumps to conclusions, the hacker could still be prosecuted under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act.

Mark Rasch, a former Justice Department computer crime prosecutor, agrees with Opsahl.

"While the DOJ guidelines are not binding on the DOJ, they certainly have persuasive authority," he said. "In this case I think the DOJ would be bound by its own interpretation of the statute and probably could not prosecute (the hacker under that statute) simply because of its own interpretation of the statute."

As mentioned above, the hacker could still be prosecuted under the CFAA, though likely for a misdemeanor, not a felony, since there was no actual loss that resulted from the hack. More specifically, he'd be prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. 1030(a)(2)(C), accessing a protected computer without authorization to obtain information.

Rasch says if the hacker were charged with a misdemeanor, he would likely face a sentence of zero to six months, depending on his history, attitude and contrition. If the hacker were to come forward and apologize to Palin and tell the FBI exactly what he did, prosecutors might take this into consideration.

"If the government treats this for what it really is, which was a kid who was curious to see if he could do this . . . then the kid should be in reasonably good shape" and face "little, if any, jail time," Rasch said.
Click top link to read full article.

Edit: Added more information.

Just Basics

join:2003-06-08
Painter, VA

It seems to me that one of the screen shots was of the inbox with all of email subjects and senders displayed.

The image that I saw was poor and I didn't look any farther for a better image but if there was one posted that was clear it is possible that the other addresses could be harvested from the screen shot.

If I was one of the senders I would certainly consider this a violation of my privacy and a loss.

"If the government treats this for what it really is, which was a kid who was curious to see if he could do this . . . then the kid should be in reasonably good shape" and face "little, if any, jail time," Rasch said.

Said by rubico 09/17/08(Wed)12:58:04 No.85782727:

"..I really wanted to get something incriminating which I was sure there would be.."

If rubico was the one to post the screen shots his intentions were very clear.


james

join:2001-02-26
antarctica


1 edit
said by Just Basics See Profile :

It seems to me that one of the screen shots was of the inbox with all of email subjects and senders displayed.
There was also a text file that was copy-pasted by one of the anons who logged onto the account.

edit:
Here's a link for those interested in what exactly was leaked. »wikileaks.org/wiki/VP_contender_···n_hacked
-
Forums » Up and Running » Security » Securityplease help me, i have problem with my PC »
« (topic move) Choosing a video card  


Saturday, 05-Dec 04:10:39 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [145] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [126] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [104] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [89] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [83] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [81] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [74] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
· [70] Baltimore To Ban Lazy Cable Installs
Most people now reading
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· DNS options, what are YOU using? [TekSavvy]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· Evading throttling with uTP / uTorrent 1.9a [TekSavvy]
· What to use while demonoid is down? [Filesharing Software]
· Farewell [Bell Canada]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· [Snow Leopard] NFS Mounts - no more Directory Utility [All Things Macintosh]
· Maximizing Rogue DPS for 3.1 [World of Warcraft]
· RG Firmware update to VDSL2 this morning [AT&T U-verse]