 man00
join:2003-07-25 74986 | reply to Frodo Re: when did AT&T start playing around with torrent transfers
So what are you saying I should do/change in the modem. router pc? |
|
 NormanS Premium,MVM join:2001-02-14 San Jose, CA
·Pacific Bell - SBC
|  Symmetric NAT connection. |
Bridge the modem, if you can. One of these days I will figure out how to beat the stupid "Walled Garden" page, and do just that.
I am currently running uTorrent through a "symmetric NAT" connection, and have "Global maximum number of connections" at 200, and "Maximum number of peers connected per torrent" at 60. I normally only run one torrent at a time, so I could probably bump that second number higher; but this is where I leave it while I am running PPP on the modem.
I've had a Netgear number fold with half those maximums. I am currently using a D-Link DIR-655. -- Norman ~Oh Lord, why have you come ~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum |
|
 Frodo
join:2006-05-05 Lees Summit, MO
| reply to man00 said by man00 :So what are you saying I should do/change in the modem. router pc? Well, if you have a router, the modem could be bridged, and the router could handle the PPPoE, and then everything would depend on the size of the router's NAT table. Without the specifications for the router, can't say. The only thing I can say is that if AT&T was blocking your P2P, then it would work no better when Windows handled the logon, versus when the modem handled the logon. |
|