orion940
Paralyzed By Confusion
Premium
join:2001-12-23
Windsor, CT
 ·AT&T Yahoo
| reply to TheGiant
Re: Users say no to AT&T
This is bs. will folks using routers and multiple PC's get more bandwidth? LOL.. LOL..
I see it is you give me bandwidth, it's up to me to do what I want with it. #salt with additional charges for having routers, multiple PC's.
If they are teaming up with linksys, I'd be leery of putting on any new firmware updates.. put a hole in it so AT&T can probe??? |
|
finortis
join:2001-11-30
| [Q]This is bs. will folks using routers and multiple PC's get more bandwidth? LOL.. LOL..
I see it is you give me bandwidth, it's up to me to do what I want with it.[/Q]
That's exactly how it works. If someone is working as a net admin on a corporate network and something goes wrong...how do you think it falls? There's a router in place, if there is a problem on one's own side of the router, it's their responsibility to fix. If the problem is on the other (IE the ISP's network)...guess who's responsible?
It isn't exactly like AT&T could actually prove whether one is using a NAT or not...or that there couldn't be ways to "deceive" the system if you will. If I was an AT&T customer and I chose to run one, I would. And if they asked, I'd just lie. Want to say otherwise? Well prove it MaBell, cya.... |
|
