 antdudeA Ninja AntPremium,VIP join:2001-03-25 kudos:2 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| WRT54GL and giga speed? Hello!
Can Linksys WRT54GL routers go faster than 100 Mb/sec for CAT5 ethernet network cables with giga speeds with third party firmwares or is that a physical thing?
Thank you in advance. |
|
 jimbopalmerTsar of all the Rushers join:2008-06-02 Greenwood, MS kudos:2 | Physical, you can however put an 8 port gig switch behind a WRT54GL, so your local traffic is faster. -- I tried to remain child-like, all I achieved was childish. |
|
 antdudeA Ninja AntPremium,VIP join:2001-03-25 kudos:2 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by jimbopalmer:Physical, you can however put an 8 port gig switch behind a WRT54GL, so your local traffic is faster. Ah thanks. I totally forgot about that WRT54GL was only up to 100Mb/sec for network cables. I thought it supported giga speed until I tried copying files locally. OOPS!
Do those faster speeds exist that are similiar to WRT54GL existed a few months ago? -- Ant @ »antfarm.ma.cx and »aqfl.net. Please do not IM/e-mail me for technical support. Use the forum! Disclaimer: The views expressed in this posting are mine, and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer |
|
 Reviews:
·Bell Sympatico
| reply to antdude said by antdude:Do those faster speeds exist that are similiar to WRT54GL existed a few months ago? If you are transferring files over wireless your next logical step would be to get an N wireless access point or router. N is still going to below wired gigabit speeds but it is still much faster then G speeds. The final version governing the operation of N products was finally ratified this past November after years of dragging along (N draft, N 2.0 draft, etc.) Since then nothing much as changed, N isn't going to get any faster.
jimbopalmer advice is quite sound, unless you have N hardware already why shell a sum of money on a new wireless router if you do your heavy file transfers by wire. A small five port gigabit switch is an affordable way to boost performance (assuming your computers support gig as well), all you need to do is plug it in and connect the Ethernet cables. |
|
 antdudeA Ninja AntPremium,VIP join:2001-03-25 kudos:2 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by Thane_Bitter:said by antdude:Do those faster speeds exist that are similiar to WRT54GL existed a few months ago? If you are transferring files over wireless your next logical step would be to get an N wireless access point or router. N is still going to below wired gigabit speeds but it is still much faster then G speeds. The final version governing the operation of N products was finally ratified this past November after years of dragging along (N draft, N 2.0 draft, etc.) Since then nothing much as changed, N isn't going to get any faster. jimbopalmer advice is quite sound, unless you have N hardware already why shell a sum of money on a new wireless router if you do your heavy file transfers by wire. A small five port gigabit switch is an affordable way to boost performance (assuming your computers support gig as well), all you need to do is plug it in and connect the Ethernet cables. I wasn't interested in giga speed for wireless. I was only interested for ethernet cables part. I have a couple newer computers and devices that can do giga speeds. -- Ant @ »antfarm.ma.cx and »aqfl.net. Please do not IM/e-mail me for technical support. Use the forum! Disclaimer: The views expressed in this posting are mine, and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer |
|
 Reviews:
·Bell Sympatico
| Ah, gotcha. Technically speeding Cat6 cable is the standard for building gigabit networks.
If you have factory made Cat5e cables (look along the length of the cable for printing describing its specs) they should work fine. Even good quality (and terminated) Cat5 cable should work. |
|
 antdudeA Ninja AntPremium,VIP join:2001-03-25 kudos:2 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by Thane_Bitter:Ah, gotcha. Technically speeding Cat6 cable is the standard for building gigabit networks. If you have factory made Cat5e cables (look along the length of the cable for printing describing its specs) they should work fine. Even good quality (and terminated) Cat5 cable should work. AFAIK, my old cables are short. They don't even go outside of my tiny room.  -- Ant @ »antfarm.ma.cx and »aqfl.net. Please do not IM/e-mail me for technical support. Use the forum! Disclaimer: The views expressed in this posting are mine, and do not necessarily reflect the views of my employer |
|
 | Even if they are CAT5 they will probally work - only one way to know for sure. |
|
 antdudeA Ninja AntPremium,VIP join:2001-03-25 kudos:2 Reviews:
·RoadRunner Cable
| said by Thane_Bitter:Even if they are CAT5 they will probally work - only one way to know for sure. Yeah. |
|
 jimbopalmerTsar of all the Rushers join:2008-06-02 Greenwood, MS kudos:2 Reviews:
·Windjammer Cable
1 edit | reply to Thane_Bitter said by Thane_Bitter:Technically speeding Cat6 cable is the standard for building gigabit networks. 1000baseT is standardized on Cat 5 cable, Cat 5e and Cat 6 are fine but not strictly needed.
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category_5_cable -- I tried to remain child-like, all I achieved was childish. |
|