site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
510
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


robnelle
Blowing Kisses To You All
Premium
join:2001-12-05
Indianapolis, IN

heh..

Anonymous to the white courtesy phone please...

TheRogueX

join:2003-03-26
Springfield, MO

Not Your Private Army!



C_
Kill The Socialists
Premium
join:2001-03-19
kudos:3

reply to robnelle
cwa supporting the merger is a far more legitimate reason to block it than any of the garbage the doj is blowing
--
"and no matter how drunk you get .. don't lick the wall socket to test polarity..."



lev
This site served its purpose
Premium,Ex-mod 2002-08
join:2001-05-30
Chicago, IL
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Comcast Business..

The CWA won't agree with Sprint, because Sprint doesn't employ CWA workers. AT&T does.

THAT'S why they're supporting AT&T in the merger. They're figuring it's better to lose jobs from the company that employs them than agree with a company that doesn't.

There was a third option. Keep their yaps shut. Shoulda taken that path.


sparc

join:2006-05-06

karl makes it sound like the CWA won't even lose any jobs in the AT&T deal. They'll actually add 20k T-mobile employees into the union. Probably at least a net positive for them overall.



robnelle
Blowing Kisses To You All
Premium
join:2001-12-05
Indianapolis, IN

reply to TheRogueX
You're right..they aren't. I never said they were.


Tuesday, 21-May 08:11:32 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics