|
how close can a cell tower be to a house?Our neighborhood has recently been invaded by what appear to be cell antennas that are *really* close to homes as you can tell by the example pic. The questions being asked by residents are: 1) Are there health risks? 2) Should we do something and if so what? Some residents are also concerned that their property values are going to go down but health is certainly the most serious question. I checked with the county and they issued a franchise (giving access to the rights of way) that looks fine. But because it was handled as a franchise, there was no notice required for individual property owners; rather, the franchise application simply had to published in some obscure publication that only a county clerk reads to confirm that the franchise application has been publicized as required by law. So needless to say, we had no prior notice. While our county and the FCC also have cell tower requirements, these were also avoided by instead reusing "existing" telephone poles. "Existing" is in quotes because (it is my understanding that) the local electrical company, which owns the poles, swapped out the regular poles for taller poles. Nonetheless, they are considered existing poles and not towers. Based on measurements taken by one of the residents, it appears that the antennas violate the FCC max permissible emissions so we have asked the company to do a more in-depth study. Nonetheless, we're wondering if we're going about this in the right way. I wish I could say precisely which company we are dealing with but depending upon which papers we look at or who we speak to, the names are either: NewPath or NextGen or Crown Castle. Evidently, they're related somehow. (And AT&T is involved as well although perhaps only as an initial user of the infrastructure - this is still unclear.) Suggestions? |
|
|
|
No more hazard than from power lines which is zero. I guess you don't hold a cell phone up to your ear or have wireless devices in your home?
Really I would not have any problem with the installation. |
|
PacratOld and Cranky MVM join:2001-03-10 Cortland, OH |
to DonLibes
That looks more like a lightning strike proximity detector... not a cell relay tower. |
|
|
fluffy to DonLibes
Anon
2012-Feb-26 9:51 pm
to DonLibes
thats not a cell tower. it has no generator/backup system, no relay dishes or fiber link, no visible connection to the tx/rx box (cant see any around either). |
|
|
said by fluffy :thats not a cell tower. it has no generator/backup system, no relay dishes or fiber link, no visible connection to the tx/rx box (cant see any around either). I think you are right. I missed that. |
|
zurk Premium Member join:2009-11-08 Beverly Hills, CA |
to DonLibes
that is most definitely not a cell tower. there is no power line going to it either (unless its at the back somewhere ?). Whatever it is, the main problem is usually the side lobes of a directional antenna. that thing might just be a passive reflector of some sort. » en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Side_lobe |
|
|
Here is a close-up of the top as well as a meter at the bottom. (It's not the same pole as the earlier pic - but a similarly configured pole that's I'm able to get much closer to.) There are some boxes at the base of the pole. I'll get some pics of those other boxes (although I believe they're all unlabelled) but they're certainly big enough to hold a substantial UPS. The county is telling us that this is part of a DAS (distributed antenna system). All the meters show 4Va and 0kWh. The company tells us the antennas are not yet on but I presume they mean they're in a testing stage and are active but perhaps not fully powered up and not providing service to customers yet. |
|
|
fluffy
Anon
2012-Feb-26 10:27 pm
ooh. i think its a electric utility meter reading system. reads all those wireless electric meters. not a cellphone antenna system. |
|
fluffy |
fluffy to DonLibes
Anon
2012-Feb-26 10:39 pm
to DonLibes
ok. that a DAS. i found a pic of it. » richmondsfblog.com/2011/ ··· 7th-ave/its tiny cellphone repeater basically. |
|
robbin Mod join:2000-09-21 Leander, TX |
to DonLibes
said by DonLibes:Based on measurements taken by one of the residents, it appears that the antennas violate the FCC max permissible emissions Please post more details. What were the measurements which were taken and what frequency is being used. How was it determined that the antennas violate FCC rules? |
|
JahntassaWhat, I can have feathers Premium Member join:2006-04-14 Conway, SC |
to DonLibes
Definitely not cellular. Best guess would be 2.4 or 5Ghz, most likely a version of WiFi. I would go with either for smart-meters or local WiFi Hotspot, but the meters sound more plausable. Based on measurements taken by one of the residents, it appears that the antennas violate the FCC max permissible emissions Not to call BS right off the bat, but i'd love to know what measurements. Unless those antennas are causing 'harmful interference', they are well far enough away from any human interaction to be considered safe by the FCC. I work with 10watt 2Ghz transmitters every day and FCC says as long as the dish is more than 6 feet away or not pointing directly at me, i'm safe. And I believe it. Not to mention the 30kW worth of transmitters i've been known to work around. Those dinky little antennas are no sort of health risk at all. |
|
|
to DonLibes
|
|
MaynardKrebsWe did it. We heaved Steve. Yipee. Premium Member join:2009-06-17
3 recommendations |
to DonLibes
Stake a chicken to the ground and see how long it takes til it's fully cooked. Then you'll have a better idea if it's safe to go outside. |
|
John Galt6Forward, March Premium Member join:2004-09-30 Happy Camp |
to DonLibes
Probably not a single thing you can do about it... |
|
nunyaLXI 483 MVM join:2000-12-23 O Fallon, MO ·Charter
|
to DonLibes
It's mini cell sectors to fill in dead zones. There is no health risk. NextG is a contractor that works for a larger cell company, be it AT&T, Cricket, U.S., T-Mobile, Verizon, Etc...
The only gripe you might have is aesthetics (sloppy install). Of course, the same people crying about the antennas are probably the same ones who piss and moan about their crappy cell service. Damned if you do and damned if you don't.
Based on measurements taken by one of the residents, it appears that the antennas violate the FCC max permissible emissions so we have asked the company to do a more in-depth study. Nonetheless, we're wondering if we're going about this in the right way.
I have to call total B.S. on that one. I'd like to know what equipment he used for "measurements", and exactly how did he know what to measure? As you can plainly see by the electric meter, this has not been turned up yet! |
|
macsierra8Baby Newfoundland Premium Member join:2003-11-30 Minden, NV 2 edits |
to DonLibes
Italian Cypress |
In the Sierras they have been installing cell phone towers that look just like fir trees. In fact it's hard to tell the difference from 500' or so away. |
|
peterboro (banned)Avatars are for posers join:2006-11-03 Peterborough, ON |
to DonLibes
said by DonLibes: 2) Should we do something and if so what? Put a pole or tower on your property as close to it as you can. Mount a conductive panel to block the RF from your house, and thus a substantial part of their radius, and watch how fast they move it. |
|
macsierra8Baby Newfoundland Premium Member join:2003-11-30 Minden, NV |
said by peterboro:said by DonLibes: 2) Should we do something and if so what? Put a pole or tower on your property as close to it as you can. Mount a conductive panel to block the RF from your house, and thus a substantial part of their radius, and watch how fast they move it. Building code height limits, engineering, city aesthetic codes, etc would make that totally impossible and impractical at best. Even if it did work you would be interfering with vital communications. |
|
nunyaLXI 483 MVM join:2000-12-23 O Fallon, MO ·Charter
1 recommendation |
to macsierra8
They (Clear) put several of those stupid tree towers by my house. Those are the most ridiculous things I've ever seen! In no way, shape, or form do they blend in with the MO/IL landscape. A simple monopole tower would be less of an eyesore than these. |
|
1 recommendation |
to DonLibes
Cell towers can be as close as ON the house itself. Many high rise apartment buildings / condos have cell towers built in and you can see the pieces mounted around the perimeter of the buildings. Most people just don't look up to see them. |
|
peterboro (banned)Avatars are for posers join:2006-11-03 Peterborough, ON |
to macsierra8
said by macsierra8: Building code height limits, engineering, city aesthetic codes, etc would make that totally impossible and impractical at best. Even if it did work you would be interfering with vital communications. The same codes would preclude the initial cell tower install then and "vital communications" is open to interpretation. As more evidence emerges of the harmful effects expect to see more opposition. This is just the leading edge like the tobacco and asbestos industry bought off experts and suppressed studies a generation ago. |
|
John Galt6Forward, March Premium Member join:2004-09-30 Happy Camp |
said by peterboro:The same codes would preclude the initial cell tower install then and "vital communications" is open to interpretation. Utilities are not subject to height limitations. |
|
peterboro (banned)Avatars are for posers join:2006-11-03 Peterborough, ON |
peterboro (banned)
Member
2012-Feb-27 1:00 am
said by John Galt6: Utilities are not subject to height limitations. In the OP a comparable, or strategic trajectory deflection, in height to block the house at least may be achievable and remember height restrictions are not uniform across North America. |
|
John Galt6Forward, March Premium Member join:2004-09-30 Happy Camp
1 recommendation |
said by peterboro:said by John Galt6: Utilities are not subject to height limitations. In the OP a comparable, or strategic trajectory deflection, in height to block the house at least may be achievable and remember height restrictions are not uniform across North America. I agree that there may be other options for the OP in that regard. Utilities are, almost without exception, unrestricted unless there is some overriding issue, such as proximity to airports. |
|
tobyTroy Mcclure join:2001-11-13 Seattle, WA |
to DonLibes
I wish a cell company would come and install one near my house.
In big cities these are very common, they made to look like drain pipes, church crosses, steeples, anything.
The more of these small cell towers, the lower the power from the larger towers, so people should be happy, if that is what they are concerned about. More RF hits you when you use your microwave or watch your tv. |
|
19579823 (banned)An Awesome Dude join:2003-08-04 |
to Pacrat
I wonder if it has camara in it?? (Could be why its so close to houses (To be used as a monitoring point)) |
|
|
Having a next generation mind control device embedded in it would be a better explanation for the proximity. |
|
|
to John Galt6
Re: how close can a cell tower be to a house?said by John Galt6:said by peterboro:The same codes would preclude the initial cell tower install then and "vital communications" is open to interpretation. Utilities are not subject to height limitations. The utilities still have to apply for zoning permission here but they can easily override the town if they say no by going to the state PUC. |
|
|
Reality to peterboro
Anon
2012-Feb-27 6:59 am
to peterboro
They could come out today and say with 100% certainty that some percentage of us will get cancer at some point due to this, and most folks would say so what. We ain't gonna get out of this alive. Wireless is now woven into the fabric of society. |
|
LazMan Premium Member join:2003-03-26 Beverly Hills, CA |
to DonLibes
I'm going to say it's not a micro-cell site; and is more likley a DAS for smart meters, public transport, or some other use...
There's no microwave uplink visable (usually a small "drum" 12-20" across) to link the site to a larger network... Cell repeaters can't operate uplinks across the same antenna sectors used for cell service; nor is it common to feed fibre to a micro-cell site.
As for the safety - I'm a firefighter, a telephone/cellular tech, and have wrenched on and painted race cars for years. I'm getting cancer at some point - there will be no way for me to tell which of my potentially risky exposures, if any, will be responsible... I don't believe there's any great risk from Wifi or cell exposure; but we'll only know for sure in the future, after the technology has been around for 30-40 years... |
|