said by diskace:
I hope this better answer our position.
I think it did.
In other words you are calling JF's BS out as well.
You weren't "forced"
to go into hiding."DSLr doesn't have to fess up"
that they are trying to "prevent discussions"
about Ebox or trying to "prevent people from knowing"
You Mean DSLr didn't "shove"
you there into "obscurity"
You weren't "moved"
to a "hidden forum"
DSLr didn't "prevent you from growing"
as a company?
These are all things JF said and alluded to.
However, you correct the fact and instead said this was your own choice and free will, for whatever reason.
I wonder why JF would hijack a Start topic to make-up and fabricate all this total and complete BS? Then toss in peoples/MOD's faces?
Oh I know... »Re: START has a Discussion Forum at DSLR !
It's not often I see so much fabricated BS in one topic by one person. But, then again, this has happened once before in this forum by the same person looking for an Open-Media forum of something like that, »Openmedia's effectiveness
so they can use people like "open-wallets" here once again
to generate revenue.
JF, ....I no longer know what to say to you. Care to explain why your fabrications don't jive with what JP stated? And also, why are you tossing these fabrications out here when you yourself know this isn't true?
What kind of game are you playing?