site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Canadian Broadband FAQ ·Canadian ISP Reviews ·Canadian ISP Forums
AuthorAll Replies

InvalidError

join:2008-02-03
kudos:5

reply to MaynardKrebs

Re: How would I request the elimination of the touch-tone fee?

I doubt the CRTC would remove touch-tone fees just because you ask and even if that goes through, incumbents who charge it will demand an adjustment to the phone service fee to offset most of it. They will likely state that the TT fee is currently used to offset the loss in productivity factor on the copper plant from losing phone subscribers to wireless, VoIP and cable.

With plenty of options available, my guess is that the CRTC will say that if you really do not want to pay TT fee, you can switch to a different provider.

CR123

join:2006-11-04
Vancouver, BC

said by InvalidError:

incumbents who charge it will demand an adjustment to the phone service fee to offset most of it.

How many incumbents charge the touch-tone fee besides Bell? I know TELUS doesn't out west.

And I don't know about out in Ontario, but here, the non-forborne (regulated) areas tend to be more rural ones with no CLEC competition, so changing to another provider isn't possible.
--
- The content of this post is my opinion, and does not reflect the opinions of my employer. -

InvalidError

join:2008-02-03
kudos:5

said by CR123:

And I don't know about out in Ontario, but here, the non-forborne (regulated) areas tend to be more rural ones with no CLEC competition, so changing to another provider isn't possible.

VoIP is a contender wherever you can get reliable IP connectivity at more than 300kbps and many rural areas can also have cable phone and cellular.

jfmezei
Premium
join:2007-01-03
Pointe-Claire, QC
kudos:22

said by InvalidError:

VoIP is a contender wherever you can get reliable IP connectivity

Not to worry, I am sure my buddy Mirko is working hard to convince CRTC to allow Bell to charge the touch tone fee on dry lines

HeadSpinning
MNSi Internet

join:2005-05-29
Windsor, ON
kudos:5

When ISDN Megalink first came out, they charged what amounted to a Touch Tone fee on each B channel. It was priced at the same price as trunk line touch tone was priced - $10.70/month IIRC.
--
MNSi Internet - »www.mnsi.net



vitesse

join:2002-12-17
Saint-Jean-Sur-Richelieu, QC
Reviews:
·ELECTRONICBOX
·TekSavvy DSL
·Bell Sympatico
·Videotron
·voip.ms

reply to jfmezei

said by jfmezei:

Not to worry, I am sure my buddy Mirko is working hard to convince CRTC to allow Bell to charge the touch tone fee on dry lines

They will call this a dial tone fee

For the original OP, to be honest it far simpler to just go with VOIP services. It's cheaper and you have more services included.
--
Connection: ElectronicBox 60mbps / 3mbps
Bilingual DSLR ElectronicBox Forum: »ELECTRONICBOX


Ott_Cable

@teksavvy.com

reply to jfmezei
Knowing Bell, their solution is probably to make IP connectivity unreliable - see DPI throttling as step 1. They weren't happy to see real time traffic outside of what they could legally throttle. :P


brad

join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON

reply to InvalidError

said by InvalidError:

VoIP is a contender wherever you can get reliable IP connectivity at more than 300kbps and many rural areas can also have cable phone and cellular.

Key being wherever you can get reliable IP connectivity... not a whole lot of ISPs that come even close to meeting that requirement when compared to the reliability of POTS.

PX Eliezer
Premium
join:2008-08-09
Hutt River
kudos:13
Reviews:
·callwithus
·voip.ms
·Optimum Voice
·Vitelity VOIP
·Gizmo5

said by brad:

Key being wherever you can get reliable IP connectivity... not a whole lot of ISPs that come even close to meeting that requirement when compared to the reliability of POTS.

This is an excellent point, and if I were Canadian what I would [really] be screaming at would be the poor quality of the ISP's overall.

The US lags behind many other countries in this, but this is one area in which Canada is even more behind.

Having said that, in the long run the Canadian ISP's will be getting better, while POTS will be getting worse.

InvalidError

join:2008-02-03
kudos:5

reply to brad

said by brad:

Key being wherever you can get reliable IP connectivity... not a whole lot of ISPs that come even close to meeting that requirement when compared to the reliability of POTS.

Most ISPs and major incumbents are good enough in general, where things get dicey is when Xplorenet or similar are the only options in the area.

brad

join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON

said by InvalidError:

Most ISPs and major incumbents are good enough in general

Well "good enough" is not reliable.


Ott_Cable

@teksavvy.com

reply to brad
>when compared to the reliability of POTS.

I remember my phone line was down for more than 48 hours and had to use pay phone to call them to fix it for a 2nd time in my school days.

So far other than a few of my ISP going out business/change hands, internet connectivity for last 10+ years has not been that bad yet.

In my case, I have a PAYGO phone, elevator emergency phone line, rental office, pay phone across the street etc as backups.


brad

join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON

said by Ott_Cable :

So far other than a few of my ISP going out business/change hands, internet connectivity for last 10+ years has not been that bad yet.

You're very lucky, but that's not typical.

InvalidError

join:2008-02-03
kudos:5

reply to brad

said by brad:

Well "good enough" is not reliable.

Most people who have VoIP for everyday calling also have cellphone as a backup when something goes wrong, so broadband "good enough" to make VoIP work when everything is working normally is good enough.

As far as emergency-worthiness "reliability" goes, I bet most people would reach for their cellphones before anything else anyhow since they are usually either worn on self or otherwise kept closer than traditional phones.

brad

join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON

said by InvalidError:

Most people who have VoIP for everyday calling also have cellphone as a backup when something goes wrong, so broadband "good enough" to make VoIP work when everything is working normally is good enough.

As far as emergency-worthiness "reliability" goes, I bet most people would reach for their cellphones before anything else anyhow since they are usually either worn on self or otherwise kept closer than traditional phones.

Which is a failure for VoIP.

InvalidError

join:2008-02-03
kudos:5

said by brad:

Which is a failure for VoIP.

It is a success as far as not having to pay touch-tone fee for the line you use for everyday calls goes.

Tuesday, 21-May 04:16:06 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics