Talk > Anime/Sci Fi > [Spoilers] The AVENGERS!!!

[Spoilers] The AVENGERS!!!

Re: [Spoiler] The advengers

reply to DarkLogix
Oh I’d go just to see Scarlett Johansson in something black and skintight,……

Although I did read the comics when I was a kid.

BTW, I guessed the enemies would be the Skrull when the trailers made it seem as if they were extraterrestrial and they showed Cap give the Hulk the order to “Smash” in one of the trailers

actually the ones faught in the movie weren't skrull but in the scene after the cool credits theres a single skrull that's being told how picking a fight with earth is like asking for death, so in the next movie I'd bet on the srkull playing a bigger part.

reply to DarkLogix
Never heard of the advengers .

Blasphemy, I now hearby excomunicate you

reply to DarkLogix
the scene where Hulk beat the crap outa loki was pure awsome

loki: I'm a god and won't be bullied by the likes of...
Hulk: go on slaming Loki so hard the cement floor starts breaking

Then Loki just lay there in the crator on the cement floor made by hulk's smashing as though loki were just some club, it was cool how hulk just interupted Loki like that

I was expecting Hulk to say something like Hulk smash puny asgard

reply to DarkLogix

reply to DarkLogix

He did say 'Puny God' but the laughter in the theatre drowned it out ... it was sooo funny. The Face at the end was Thanos....he's a God wannabe...look him up and he's very tied into the cosmic cube/tesseract...and he's courts death so that line at the end where the attach leader says to attack earth is to court death...it means he will be back and it willl be cosmic

Thank you
I got my wires crossed. I told my kids he was Darkseid, which is I recall is a DC creation. Thanos, the being who loved/worshipped death. I seem to recall him being a major player in Marvel's first Secret Wars. Spider-man had a bit part in that cross over event, I think.
--
Care Bear This: If anything I say offends you, then you have a problem. As I am a stranger to you, so my words should have zero emotional impact on you. If they do, please seek help from Dr. Phil.
Tardfarmers, the home of Dr. Dan.

reply to DarkLogix
Your title says "advengers' not avengers which is the proper spelling.

All in all, a decent movie by the guy that created Buffy verse and Firefly.

I'm willing to bet Disney is very happy that John Carter was a bomb, right about now. Imagine their tax bill if John Carter was a box office hit, and then add to it the money they will be making from this.

I just wish Spidey wasn't going to be an origin film. We had two origin flicks with the Hulk, and now will get another with the reboot of spider-man.

This movie had a few nice things in it. Sadly, they could have spent more time on Pepper Potts legs. Damn Gwyneth can rock some short shorts. Sure Scarlett was ok looking in her outfit as well. Then there was Fury's "second in command'. She wasn't to shabby either.
--
Care Bear This: If anything I say offends you, then you have a problem. As I am a stranger to you, so my words should have zero emotional impact on you. If they do, please seek help from Dr. Phil.
Tardfarmers, the home of Dr. Dan.

reply to DarkLogix
Oops, I forget. A tip of the hat to the unsung hero behind many of the characters appearing in the Avengers movie, and no it's not the media whore Stan Lee. It's Jack Kirby. Thanks Jack for sharing your imagination with the rest of us.
»en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Kirby
--
Care Bear This: If anything I say offends you, then you have a problem. As I am a stranger to you, so my words should have zero emotional impact on you. If they do, please seek help from Dr. Phil.
Tardfarmers, the home of Dr. Dan.

reply to Snakeoil

reply to DarkLogix
At least after 1 bad and 1 ok films they got the hulk right....he even had a bit of dialog there...loved the bit after he and Thor took down one of the big ships....lol...Joss can sure script the funny.

Nia

reply to Bobcat79
Interesting that the british Avengers hit the TV in 1961, and Marvel's Avengers hit print in 1963.

reply to DarkLogix
Can you edit the title of the post so it's correct? It's really bothering me.
--
Whats smells like blue?

reply to Niarlan
I am so happy there were no "origins" in this movie. And yes, I agree this Hulk version seemed to be ok, as a supporting role. Out of the 3 actors to play Hulk, I still think Edward Norton did it the best, as Banner.

I just wish there'd be another peek into the firefly universe.
--
Care Bear This: If anything I say offends you, then you have a problem. As I am a stranger to you, so my words should have zero emotional impact on you. If they do, please seek help from Dr. Phil.
Tardfarmers, the home of Dr. Dan.

reply to DarkLogix
Speaking of good movie, The Advengers (wtf is wrong with you) Avengers shattered movie sales records by scoring over 200 million dollars! Congrats to a hell of a movie!

»www.eonline.com/news/avengers_sm···d/314126

quote:

---

The Avengers is the new king of the opening weekend.

The superhero movie grossed a unprecedented $200.3 million in its Friday-Sunday box-office debut, its studio estimated.

The film is the first to break $200 million in three days. It destroyed the mark held by the previous weekend record-holder, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2.

After just over a week in release worldwide, The Avengers has grossed $641.8 million overall.

The Avengers, $200.3 million
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 2, $169.2 million
The Dark Knight, $158.4 million
The Hunger Games, $152.5 million
Spider-Man 3, $151.1 million
The Twilight Saga: New Moon, $142.8 million
The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn—Part 1, $138.1 million
Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest, $135.6 million
Iron Man 2, $128.1 million
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1, $125 million

---

reply to Omega

reply to loli