Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » The Zyan mess » Advice for a small company
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
9
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


SomeHope

@anonymizer.com

 reply to SMALLBLUE
Re: Advice for a small company

From what I know Zyan's standard consumer contract is VOID and not enforceable in California courts due to the simple fact that they cannot produce an original contract. Remember we all faxed in our contracts to them, so they do NOT have an original contract to present in court. Think about it California is the most consumer friendly state in the Union, no Judge will take a photocopied signature seriously, who knows what terms a company could have put on that signature. I haven't paid a bill in over 5 months and when their collections department called me (the manager), I brought this fact up and told him to please take me to court so I could win. Well, they haven't, nor have they sent me to any collection agency. The key here is that you are terminating your agreement based on the fact that is simply not legal. Therefore, you must cease using their DSL service when you stop paying. They can check this fact, so as long as there is no traffic on your router you will be find. Resist the temptation to use the service and you will be fine. As far as another DSL ISP, Earthlink is doing quite well and they include 20 hours of dial up for back up . . . all for $39.95 a month. Good luck to you all and Happy Holidays. Zyan deserves to be boiled in their own pudding!

ethaves

join:2000-05-19
Milwaukee, WI

said by SomeHope:
From what I know Zyan's standard consumer contract is VOID and not enforceable in California courts due to the simple fact that they cannot produce an original contract. Remember we all faxed in our contracts to them, so they do NOT have an original contract to present in court. Think about it California is the most consumer friendly state in the Union, no Judge will take a photocopied signature seriously, who knows what terms a company could have put on that signature.

What makes you believe that this is accurate? Might you be able to direct me to the statute in California law that indicates this? I have searched Findlaw.com and other resources and have not seen mention of this. I know others would also find this of value.


L0GiX
When all else fails, theres always L0GiX
Premium
join:2000-06-30
South Bay,CA
clubs:

reply to SomeHope
said by SomeHope:
From what I know Zyan's standard consumer contract is VOID and not enforceable in California courts due to the simple fact that they cannot produce an original contract. Remember we all faxed in our contracts to them, so they do NOT have an original contract to present in court
I too want to know where you base this information on. I have two small business clients with Zyan. I know they are still answering their customer support telephones because one of my customers had a problem with the local PacHell telco and they helped fix it.

Please provide a reference I can use to help my clients get out of this isp.

dbarc

join:2000-01-22
Fort Wayne, IN

reply to SomeHope
said by SomeHope:
From what I know Zyan's standard consumer contract is VOID and not enforceable in California courts due to the simple fact that they cannot produce an original contract. Remember we all faxed in our contracts to them, so they do NOT have an original contract to present in court. Think about it California is the most consumer friendly state in the Union, no Judge will take a photocopied signature seriously, who knows what terms a company could have put on that signature.

I can understand the frustration, but feel your post may not be totally accurate. For one, the Zyan is now in bankruptcy. That's a FEDERAL court, not state. The validity of any contract will not be determined by California state laws. Though IANAL, I'm not aware of a signature on a fax not being accepted if the signature is a legitimate signature and have seen many many many of then accepted as being binding. I think the best bet is that they simply haven't provide the service for which the contract applies. But to get out of it now, IMHO, it'll take the blessing of the bankruptcy judge ( or an appointed trustee or referee) if you don't want to pay cancellation fees that may be included within the original contract.
Forums » The Zyan mess


Thursday, 10-Dec 22:13:38 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [200] Sprint Sued For Distracted Driving Death
· [136] AT&T Launching New 24 Mbps U-Verse Tier
· [87] AT&T Hints At Usage-Based iPhone Data Pricing
· [82] 3G Network Test Says AT&T Is Tops
· [75] WPA Cracker: Test WPA-PSK Networks In 20 Minutes
· [72] Mediacom Unveils 105 Mbps Pricing
· [66] Sprint Poised For A Turnaround?
· [55] Average American Consumes 34 Gigabytes Daily
· [52] AT&T: iPhone Data Pricing Comments 'Taken Out Of Context'
· [51] The Future Of Wi-Fi Is Bright
Most people now reading
· New Mediacom Email [Mediacom]
· [WIN7] Well, I was dumb, but do I have recourse? [Microsoft Help]
· IMG 1.7 (IMG Updates and Discussion) [Verizon FIOS TV]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· ICC strats [World of Warcraft]
· malware has been found hidden inside an Ubuntu screensaver [Security]
· [How to] Install Asterisk on an Asus WL-520GU router [VOIP Tech Chat]
· 60GB would only last us two days! [TekSavvy]
· Snow on Roof [Home Repair & Improvement]