dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
4586
share rss forum feed

Mar9tin

join:2012-07-08

speednet grade of F

I am currently able to download at only 1/10th of the b/w I pay for. Speednet grades this F. I know we had storms through here this afternoon, but this seems to be a regular Sunday nite occurrence and I'm frigging tired of it.


gadgetboyj

join:2009-08-25
Staten Island, NY
kudos:2

What router are you using? Is it the Verizon supplied Actiontec MI424WR? If so, what revision is it?



More Fiber
Premium,MVM
join:2005-09-26
West Chester, PA
kudos:29
reply to Mar9tin

•What tier are you on?
•Are you testing wired or wireless?
•Do you get full speed the rest of the time?
•When this happens, what speeds do you get on VZ's test site?
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world; those who understand binary and those who don't.



danclan

join:2005-11-01
Midlothian, VA

Further:

What site?

Without more information folks can neither confirm or deny your complaint.


Mar9tin

join:2012-07-08
reply to Mar9tin

The problem persists. The router has nothing to do with it altho it is an old D-link 624. I was getting 10Mbps before Sunday's storms in the the DC area and now it's between 1 and 1.5Mbps. I foolishly contacted a Verizon no-nothing, in India apparently, who asked me to reset my router, which of course lost all my settings, my connection and him. But good riddance. What galls me is that this is obviously a network problem, and Verizon doesn't have the balls to just admit and ask for patience. They are on a par with Pepco.


Mar9tin

join:2012-07-08
reply to danclan

Speednet.net, but I got the same result here.


Mar9tin

join:2012-07-08

I wouldn't touch one of Verizon's tests with a ten-foot pole. I've used Verizon since about 2002 abd FIOS since 3005. Posted here years ago, I think before they required log-ins, at least I couldn't find the user:pass and had to sign up again just to look at the forum. I saw something about slow speeds somewhere on this site yesterday, but couldn't find it again and still can't.



danclan

join:2005-11-01
Midlothian, VA

so you are still not providing us with any information regarding details to assist. Without such details and without using tools that have been recommended we really cant help you.

There is nothing wrong with verizons speed test.

We still dont know where you are trying to get to

We dont know what service you are supposed to be getting

You do appear to be running on very old equipment, nothing wrong with it but its just old.



birdfeedr
Premium,MVM
join:2001-08-11
Warwick, RI
kudos:9
reply to Mar9tin

FiOS support does not go to India, at least at this time.

Perform a traceroute to dslreports.com and post the results.

Also, use »my.verizon.com/micro/speedtest/broadband/ and click the red button for the classic speed test. It includes a link for connection details that will be helpful in diagnosing.

If you're ordinarily getting 10Mbps with a D-link 624, you're either on an old legacy plan, or you're limited by hardware/software on premises. Then a storm rolls through and you get worse.

Understandable, but details are needed, including what you're supposed to get. We had a legacy 10/2 plan at one location until we upgraded to business account 25/25 in January.


prisaz

join:2008-08-11
Germantown, MD
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

4 edits
reply to Mar9tin

If you do have FiOS, I would say Verizon owes you a new router. The DI-624 is old, and even on my 20/5 connection it would choke. I would say they owe you an updated Actiontec router. If that does not solve your issues, then perhaps a tech needs to come and check your ONT or run more test.

Oh yes let me mention I am not 20/5 anymore. I am running Quantum 75/35, and get about 84/39. I have had about every bundled speed since 2005, and always A+. Oh I skipped the 5Mbps speed at launch, and went straight 15/2, 20/5, 25/25, 35/35, and now 75/35. Fios rules.

Make them send you a new router. My DI-624 was upgraded when TV was added. Now if you were a convert from DSL, they may have given you an older router if you don't have FiOS TV. Some of the very first TV installs may have used the 624 with and adapter for the TV connection. Bottom line you should get a new router, regardless.

Montgomery County Maryland

Edit for spelling.



aaronwt
Premium
join:2004-11-07
Woodbridge, VA
reply to Mar9tin

You missed the 30/5 and 50/20
Those are the two I had over the last five years before getting the 35/35 tier when it came out. I'm still flip flopping about pulling the trigger on 75/35. If the upload speed was higher I would switch in a heartbeat.


prisaz

join:2008-08-11
Germantown, MD
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

said by aaronwt:

You missed the 30/5 and 50/20
Those are the two I had over the last five years before getting the 35/35 tier when it came out. I'm still flip flopping about pulling the trigger on 75/35. If the upload speed was higher I would switch in a heartbeat.

They were never offered in a "Bundle" in our market. 30/5 or 50/20. In Tripple Play. or any other.

xocsucram

join:2008-10-02

2 edits
reply to Mar9tin

its probably an issue with the verizon routers in your region(the actual routers for internet traffic, not your household routers), i was having issues earlier this year, an finally pinpointed specific regional IPs which belonged to Fios, that were causing it using tracerts, they fixed it about a week later.

you can also try running a test on Pingtest.net to all the servers in your area, not just the "recommended" ones and see if only certain ones give really bad results.

if you have a server close to you that has great results and another right next to it giving you the bad grade, they're probably going thru a bad router.

your Pingtest should be 1-2MS of ping delay and less than 5 jitter. dont worry about packetloss if you have manual security restrictions setup, the Jitter and Ping Delay are all you need.

also streaming data shouldn't effect your scores, i can run the test while streaming 3-4 games on MLB.tv, running Youtube ect... the scores are the same.


SL83

join:2005-05-28
Oceanside, NY
kudos:1
reply to Mar9tin

This is the wonderful connection quality I have been experiencing for the past week or so:

C:\Windows\system32>tracert speedtest.verizon.net

Tracing route to speedtest.verizon.net [206.46.241.4]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
2 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms L100.NYCMNY-VFTTP-135.verizon-gni.net [98.116.10
0.1]
3 7 ms 7 ms 6 ms G0-13-3-5.NYCMNY-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net [130.81.
182.182]
4 7 ms 6 ms * so-3-1-0-0.NY5030-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.8
1.151.234]
5 107 ms 93 ms 54 ms so-4-0-0-0.DFW01-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81
.17.41]
6 54 ms 54 ms 54 ms so-1-0-0-0.DFW03-CORE-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.
81.20.157]
7 144 ms 251 ms 217 ms po1.ctn-border1.vzlink.com [206.46.225.85]
8 57 ms 56 ms 56 ms 206.46.225.210
9 55 ms 56 ms 56 ms 206.46.241.4

Trace complete.

So far it has yielded me with a "Is this happening on all your computers?"



More Fiber
Premium,MVM
join:2005-09-26
West Chester, PA
kudos:29

Why are you using a Dallas speedtest server, when you are in New York? Use a closer server.
--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world; those who understand binary and those who don't.


rebus9

join:2002-03-26
Tampa Bay
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
·Bright House
reply to SL83

said by SL83:

This is the wonderful connection quality I have been experiencing for the past week or so:

C:\Windows\system32>tracert speedtest.verizon.net

Tracing route to speedtest.verizon.net [206.46.241.4]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

  1    <1 ms    <1 ms    <1 ms  Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
  2     4 ms     4 ms     4 ms  L100.NYCMNY-VFTTP-135.verizon-gni.net [98.116.10
0.1]
  3     7 ms     7 ms     6 ms  G0-13-3-5.NYCMNY-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net [130.81.
182.182]
  4     7 ms     6 ms     *     so-3-1-0-0.NY5030-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.8
1.151.234]
  5   107 ms    93 ms    54 ms  so-4-0-0-0.DFW01-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.81
.17.41]
  6    54 ms    54 ms    54 ms  so-1-0-0-0.DFW03-CORE-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.
81.20.157]
  7   144 ms   251 ms   217 ms  po1.ctn-border1.vzlink.com [206.46.225.85]
  8    57 ms    56 ms    56 ms  206.46.225.210
  9    55 ms    56 ms    56 ms  206.46.241.4
 
Trace complete.

So far it has yielded me with a "Is this happening on all your computers?"

What's wrong with the traceroute results? It looks pretty textbook clean to me. 56ms between NYC and TX.

If you're referring to the lack of response to the third echo on hop #4, then you clearly know nothing about traceroutes and how intermediate routers handle ICMP.

The only thing that matters is END TO END (hint: Last Hop) connection, and your traceroute results show consistent results within 1ms of each other with zero loss.

rebus9

join:2002-03-26
Tampa Bay
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS
·Bright House

2 edits
reply to SL83

said by SL83:

This is the wonderful connection quality I have been experiencing for the past week or so:

C:\Windows\system32>tracert speedtest.verizon.net

You're tracing to the VZ speedtest front-end. It doesn't matter where that's hosted, because AFTER you enter the speedtest site, you choose the state you're in.

Your speed test DOES NOT RUN from the "speedtest.verizon.net" front-end.

IP address of the NY speedtest: 108.12.159.18

Traceroute to there, and you'll see much different results.

SL83

join:2005-05-28
Oceanside, NY
kudos:1
reply to More Fiber

Yeah my bad - I posted the wrong results. I've had spikes over 130ms to my gateway and packetloss to my gateway.

That's what happens when you're up too late several nights in a row:

Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
over a maximum of 30 hops:

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
2 71 ms 74 ms 74 ms L100.NYCMNY-VFTTP-135.verizon-gni.net [98.116.10
0.1]
3 61 ms 54 ms 59 ms G0-10-5-0.NYCMNY-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net [130.81.
129.76]
4 106 ms 67 ms 66 ms so-3-1-0-0.NY5030-BB-RTR1.verizon-gni.net [130.8
1.151.234]
5 66 ms 74 ms 69 ms 0.ae5.BR3.NYC4.ALTER.NET [152.63.16.9]
6



More Fiber
Premium,MVM
join:2005-09-26
West Chester, PA
kudos:29

said by SL83:

1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms Wireless_Broadband_Router.home [192.168.1.1]
2 71 ms 74 ms 74 ms L100.NYCMNY-VFTTP-135.verizon-gni.net [98.116.100.1]

That's clearly indicative of a problem between you and VZ's edge router. Simply pinging the edge router doesn't indicate if you're seeing lost packets, which is why I prefer WINMTR.

However, even WINMTR isn't going to tell you if it's a bad ONT, a bad optical splitter, poor fiber connection, or a bad PON card.

--
There are 10 kinds of people in the world; those who understand binary and those who don't.

SL83

join:2005-05-28
Oceanside, NY
kudos:1
reply to Mar9tin

One kinda long ping test to my gateway (sorry for the length)

Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=33ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=169ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=161ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=164ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=167ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=169ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=171ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=174ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=176ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=178ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=179ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=182ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=188ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=117ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=129ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=102ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=108ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=107ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=118ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=122ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=127ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=131ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=132ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=134ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=113ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=34ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=17ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=16ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=77ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=76ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=18ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=11ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=13ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=135ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=30ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=53ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=88ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=60ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=100ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=50ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=68ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=55ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=73ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=58ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=65ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=62ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
Reply from 98.116.100.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=126
 
Ping statistics for 98.116.100.1:
Packets: Sent = 500, Received = 500, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 3ms, Maximum = 188ms, Average = 18ms

No packetloss this time - but the latency seems to spike out of nowhere. Running actual speed tests I get some odd results. On myspeed.visualware.com I am getting erratic results:

Just did 2 tests back to back, one I was getting 42Mbps down and 35 up, 5 seconds later I am getting 1.68Mbps down 36.4 up.

The actual verizon speed test I am getting semi stable downspeeds but consistent up speeds of 12Mbps.

SL83

join:2005-05-28
Oceanside, NY
kudos:1

1 edit
reply to More Fiber

Click for full size
Yeah - Verizon was here the past 2 weeks or so digging up the road on my street. I'm not entirely certain, but it seems the problems started happening when they started working. They are now done working - and my problem hasn't gone away.

I used to use UOTrace back in the late 90s.

»support.uo.com/latency.html


sashwa
Premium,Mod
join:2001-01-29
Alcatraz
kudos:17
reply to Mar9tin

(topic move) Speednet grade of F with Opera

Moderator Action
The post that was here (and all 1 followups to it), has been moved to a new topic .. »Speednet grade of F with Opera



Oceanside426

@verizon.net
reply to SL83

Re: speednet grade of F

SL83 I live in Oceanside and I am as well having slow speeds and really bad speedtests if you want look at my thread at the link »New FiOS install problems


SL83

join:2005-05-28
Oceanside, NY
kudos:1

Interesting. I am off Weidner right behind the train station. They were tearing up the road on Lawson and Weidner for the past week or so - right in front of the VFW. They have since finished - but my problems are still there.

Can you post a few trace routes to compare? What's your gateway and how are your ping times/packetloss to it? etc

Thanks!


Oceanside426

join:2012-07-15
Oceanside, NY


Optimum WinMTR Dslreports.com

Fios WinMTR Dslreports.com

Optimum WinMTR Google.com

Fios WinMTR Google.com
Ok here are some WinMtr tests done on both my optimum that Luckily I didn't cancel yet and my fios that is runny really crappy.. I will also post tracerouts done by Ultima Online Trace Utility for both in the next post.

Oceanside426

join:2012-07-15
Oceanside, NY

Click for full size
Optimum Trace&Ping Dslreports.com
Click for full size
Fios Trace&Ping Dslreports.com
Click for full size
Optimum Trace&Ping Google.com
Click for full size
Fios Trace&Ping Google.com
Here are the Traceroutes and Pings I promised. im noticing optimum is always lowernumbers with everything.

SL83

join:2005-05-28
Oceanside, NY
kudos:1

In the UOTrace, after you do the initial trace, you can hit Poll and it will send continuous packets along the route to give you a better idea of what's going on.

Hit stop poll when you're done. You'll get min/max/average and percent packetloss.


Oceanside426

join:2012-07-15
Oceanside, NY
reply to Oceanside426

Click for full size
Optimum SpeedTest
Click for full size
Fios SpeedTest
Here are speedtest done on the same computer a few seconds after one another... so my computer can handle the speed its just something is not working right with my fios services I don't understand why... I have new windows install I also have the fios speed optimizer installed... The only speed test that gives me higher results is the verizon speed test but something is not right with that because I can get acurate results with optimum on any speed test. I have a funny feeling the verizon one is looking for the highest speed for instance the problem that im getting is sometimes I get the correct speed in the beginning of the speed test but then a few seconds latter the test drops to 30 then to 20 and then to 5 or 6 or occasionally 2 or 4 mbps the upload is usually good it's the download that cant sustain.

Oceanside426

join:2012-07-15
Oceanside, NY
reply to SL83

SL83 how are your speedtests are you getting accurate ones or tests that drop out by the end of the test or start out low.. and if you are getting bad tests results can you run a test on speedtest.verizon.net


Oceanside426

join:2012-07-15
Oceanside, NY

Click for full size
Optimum Trace&Poll Dslreports.com
Click for full size
Fios Trace&Poll Dslreports.com
Click for full size
Optimum Trace&Poll Google.com
Click for full size
Fios Trace&Poll Google.com
Ok SL83 I have run traceroutes and polls for Google And Dslreports as you instructed here are the results attached by the way I have run all these tests including the ones previously posted for 3 minutes.