site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·The Gallery ·Vote! Vote! Vote! ·Forum Guidelines ·DIFAQ ·Reviews ·Permanent Greeting ·User Equp
AuthorAll Replies

TheAnalyzer

join:2006-01-20

reply to Jodokast96

Re: Getting my first DSLR camera

I researched both cameras you suggested very nice cameras indeed, but I also came across the Nikon D3200.

The Nikon looked very nice too so why do you think is it crippled and can not be recommended?

Thanks!

TA
--
quod erat demonstrandum


jmacd27
Premium
join:2001-05-13
Toronto, ON

said by TheAnalyzer:

I researched both cameras you suggested very nice cameras indeed, but I also came across the Nikon D3200.

The Nikon looked very nice too so why do you think is it crippled and can not be recommended?

Thanks!

TA

The D3200 does seem pretty nice for a beginners model.

I too am curious what makes it crippled as a beginners camera.


Jodokast96
Stupid people really piss me off.
Premium
join:2005-11-23
Erial, NJ
kudos:2

reply to TheAnalyzer
Mostly the lack of an internal focus motor. Not all lenses Nikon makes has their own motors, so some will be manual focus only when used on lower end Nikon bodies.


TheAnalyzer

join:2006-01-20

Okay your talking about the AF-S thing.

Oh if that is all.. . I know that they are more expensive.
So you would want to buy AF-S lenses only for that body.
That's okay.

The important thing though IMO is if I upgrade the body with one that has an internal focus motor will the AF-S lenses work with that body?

TA
--
quod erat demonstrandum


Saturday, 25-May 19:39:37 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics