 SueSPremium join:2007-05-16 Macon, MO kudos:2 | Can you tell? Canon EOS 7D 400mm 1/8000th +0.6ev F8 ISO800
|
I was not able to capture this bird in the way I wanted, so decided to play. This is something I never do with my own images, because I am sure someone would be able to tell.
Can you tell this is two separate snapshots and how? I appreciate honest opinions. |
|
 mromeroPremium join:2000-12-07 The O.C. kudos:1 | shot in the dark, but is the water a different shot?
Something does not look right about the transition between the water and dirt foreground. Almost like some sort of aggressive feathering was applied. |
|
 grendalMmm DonutsPremium join:2001-10-10 Fremont, CA | reply to SueS no shadow under the bird. It looks like bird/water was from 1 image and the ground from another image. |
|
 tmpchaosRequiescat in pacePremium,Mod join:2000-04-28 Hoboken, NJ | reply to SueS Focus- the bird's feet are in better focus than the stones near them. |
|
 pcdebbRIP dadkinsPremium join:2000-12-03 Brandon, FL kudos:5 | reply to SueS i see blur on the waters edge? (more on the left of the bird) -- | map your city | |
|
 Locutus65Why bother?Premium join:2001-05-24 Houston, TX kudos:2 Reviews:
·Comcast
| said by pcdebb:i see blur on the waters edge? (more on the left of the bird) Same -- Today I saw something that reminded me of you. But dont worry, I flushed and everything went back to normal. |
|
 jaykaykay4 Ever YoungPremium,MVM join:2000-04-13 Scottsdale, AZ kudos:22 | reply to SueS I agree with Tmpchaos re: the feet and focus. That said, I actually don't think that it would have been noticed, at least not by me, had you not asked. |
|
 SueSPremium join:2007-05-16 Macon, MO kudos:2 | reply to SueS Everyone is right. I didn't spend too much time with it, but was curious to see how quick everyone found the line. Had you not known it was two images would you have noticed?
Thanks for the replies. I don't think this is something I will be doing to my images now or in the future. |
|
|
|
 Locutus65Why bother?Premium join:2001-05-24 Houston, TX kudos:2 Reviews:
·Comcast
| Yes, I would have spotted it. The line is simply too obvious. If you had used a bigger smoothing brush and lessened the hardness it would have made it less noticeable. -- Today I saw something that reminded me of you. But dont worry, I flushed and everything went back to normal. |
|
 EGeezerGo CatsPremium join:2002-08-04 Midwest kudos:8 | reply to SueS Double crested cormorant I believe - Yes, I did notice the difference in contrast, difference around the feet and a slight halo around the tail. It's still better than I could do though! |
|
 jaykaykay4 Ever YoungPremium,MVM join:2000-04-13 Scottsdale, AZ kudos:22 | reply to SueS First of all. my eyes aren't good enough to get all the detail everyone saw. Secondly, I thought it was a nice image, and again, had you not asked about it, I would continued to have thought the same. Many images are played with/edited/rendered just for the fun of it or to get a result that an individual is looking for...not to fool anyone into thinking otherwise. It is one of my favorite things to do, as you all know. Oft times, it's a matter of time and patience, but at other times, it's merely a matter of another goal, any of which are fine.
I know, you didn't ask what I replied beyond can anyone tell. But, I do think that the goal is as important in any image. -- JKK
Age is a very high price to pay for my maturity. If I can't stay young, I can at least stay immature!
»www.pbase.com/jaykaykay
|
|