richb01803
Rich
join:2001-02-14
02100
| reply to NetGeek6
Re: Yea I saw that
said by NetGeek:
But, this 2002, and nobody believes anything unless they can see a picture.
Well, even back in 1972, many folks were convinced that the Apollo 11 landing was faked. (Probably the same folks who believed the fake photos of UFOs swarming over New Mexico someplace.) |
|
NetGeek6
Who?? Me??
Premium
join:2000-02-22
Mount Clemens, MI
| reply to dnoyeB
Of course, there are the number of reports and eye-witnesses that reported watching the plane smash into the building. Right after the incident, people were being interviewed saying that they watched it.
Or, the fact that there is an airliner missing, that people on the airliner are missing.
But, this 2002, and nobody believes anything unless they can see a picture.
--Netgeek
--
I'm not even suppose to BE here today!!! |
|
dnoyeB
Ferrous Phallus
join:2000-10-09
Southfield, MI
|  reply to kilingspam
Yea I have gone thru that find the Boeing thing. It made me suspecious. What made me moreso what the latest video which was released. Someone had a video camer going right at the building at the time.
Now don't ask me why, maybe it was a security camera. And maybe that explains why several frames are not there and its basically turned into snap shots.
In any event, that 'video' clearly showed the explosion as it started up. NO PLANE, no parts flying, nothing. I saw the planes at the WTF (ad infinitum..). This one is certainly missing. Could it have been shot down, and a missle hit the pentagon? If so, where did it land? Why havent we heard about it?
Also, how many of you remember that during the day there were 8 planes missing, but by the time I got home from work, it somehow turned into 4 without any accounting of the rest??
--
dnoyeB"Then said I, Wisdom [is] better than strength: nevertheless the poor man's wisdom [is] despised, and his words are not heard. " Ecclesiastes 9:16
The government is pricing our rights our of our reach. |
|
