| reply to RRedline
Re: Still WAY behind Verizon Right but when it comes to network performance LTE to LTE, AT&T has greater speeds. |
|
 RRedlineRated RPremium
join:2002-05-15
Williamsport, PA | I'm sure the millions of people stuck using AT&T's EDGE network will be happy to know that AT&T's LTE is fast.
--
One nation, under Zod! |
|
| Well in my state verizon has far more lte then at&t has hsdpa.
And you can keep bragging about your state having more hsdpa and falling back to hsdpa, or just wait a few more months for verizon to own at&t in your state too. |
|
 SeleniaI love DebianPremium
join:2006-09-22
Lanesboro, MA
kudos:2 | said by Metatron2008:Well in my state verizon has far more lte then at&t has hsdpa.
And you can keep bragging about your state having more hsdpa and falling back to hsdpa, or just wait a few more months for verizon to own at&t in your state too.
If and when that happens, then it will be another good option for wireless broadband. As it stands right now, Verizon is crap except in the big cities with LTE. Their EvDO sucks more and more as smartphones keep gaining popularity. I would rather have uniform hspa+ between 5 and 20 megabits with slightly patchier LTE than to have slightly bigger but still patchy LTE coverage and be stuck on EvDO that now has trouble reaching 1 megabit most of the time
--
A fool thinks they know everything.
A wise person knows enough to know they couldn't possibly know everything.
There are zealots for every OS, like every religion. They do not represent the majority of users for either. |
|
 EvelKubKitty is crazyPremium
join:2002-03-17
Mesa, AZ | Ignore, browser generated error during this post, so I didn't know it posted. |
|
