Reviews:
 ·Cogeco Cable
| reply to dragonfly
Re: Boy in chains appears at door said by dragonfly:I'm in favor of life sentences (dangerous offender status) for child kidnappers and pornographers, how about you guys?
Anyone that sexually abuses a child or kidnaps a child with the intent to sexually abuse a child, yes, they need to be locked up and the key needs to be thrown away. I fully endorse "rot in prison".
Creating pornography, falls under the first one.
Viewing it without the intent to engage in the acts... I'm on the fence here as the private in-home viewing of the content may prevent a person from acting out their desires. A man beats off to regular porn, he's good for a while... can the same be said for potential exploiters of children? I don't know.
Maybe it's like video games, where I can play a game like Grand Theft Auto and mow down a pile of people and shoot them to death, but I'd never do that in 'real life'. |
|
 A LurkerPremium
join:2007-10-27
Burlington, ON | said by urbanriot:Viewing it without the intent to engage in the acts... I'm on the fence here as the private in-home viewing of the content may prevent a person from acting out their desires. A man beats off to regular porn, he's good for a while... can the same be said for potential exploiters of children? I don't know. Yes, but whose kids do you sign up to make the porn? I get what you're saying, but when you allow the viewing of it without consequences, you create the market demand for it. |
|
Reviews:
·Cogeco Cable
| said by A Lurker:Yes, but whose kids do you sign up to make the porn? I get what you're saying, but when you allow the viewing of it without consequences, you create the market demand for it.
I didn't consider the making of it, only the fact that it's 'out there'... you have a good point. |
|
Reviews:
 ·TekSavvy DSL
·Cogeco Cable
| reply to A Lurker
said by A Lurker:Yes, but whose kids do you sign up to make the porn? I get what you're saying, but when you allow the viewing of it without consequences, you create the market demand for it. This is a very scary thought indeed. The entire concept makes me want to vomit.
On the flip side; in theory we're getting to the point where such material will not require real actors at all. In theory the actors could be simulations. Which then changes the entire concept - since you've eliminated victims in the creation - should it be legal.
Boy I'd like to close that box I just opened. |
|
A LurkerPremium
join:2007-10-27
Burlington, ON | said by CanadianRip:On the flip side; in theory we're getting to the point where such material will not require real actors at all. In theory the actors could be simulations. Agreed (although the concept is creepy). I would suspect that some just wouldn't get off on simulated actors, even if lifelike and realistic. |
|
 AnavSarcastic Llama? Naw, Just AcerbicPremium
join:2001-07-16
Dartmouth, NS
kudos:3 | I think A lurker you hit the nail on Urbans head with your comment. Its the same with exploitation of women. Although there may be no result of you watching it in your home, the fact is many women are abused to feed the porn industry. Its a sick cycle. In the case of children they are exploited but not being adults puts them into a different category such that society is willing to go to greater lengths in their defence.......... such that even possessing the material is illegal.
--
Ain't nuthin but the blues! "Albert Collins".
Leave your troubles at the door! "Pepe Peregil" De Sevilla. Just Don't Wifi without WPA, "Yul Brenner"
LlamaWorks Equipment |
|
