 BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | Unless those numbers mean 1000's then this is hyperbole. 800? That's a huge increase? Ok 800 out of 300 MILLION people. I think my odds are pretty damed good I'm not being spied on. |
|
 birdfeedrPremium,MVM
join:2001-08-11
Warwick, RI
kudos:8 | said by BF69:then this is hyperbole. 800? That's a huge increase? Ok 800 out of 300 MILLION people.
That's email and internet. Go to the original article for the telephone numbers.
Better though, to check the timeline. The spike started in 2009 and has not showed signs of leveling. A reflection of the times we live in. |
|
| reply to BF69
Well there you have it! Since the odds of them actually violating your rights are so low, then it is OK for them to violate our rights period.
Sarcasm - Screw those that just happen to fall into that very low % of people who get violated. I'm sure they deserved it anyway right? |
|
BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | said by Skippy25:Well there you have it! Since the odds of them actually violating your rights are so low, then it is OK for them to violate our rights period.
Sarcasm - Screw those that just happen to fall into that very low % of people who get violated. I'm sure they deserved it anyway right?
and you know those people being looked at are getting their rights violated because...................? What Karl says so? |
|
CXM_SplicerLooking at the bigger picturePremium
join:2011-08-11
NYC
kudos:1 | reply to BF69
quote:
I think my odds are pretty damed good I'm not being spied on.
Wrong. I have been collecting your posts for months now and am ready to submit my report. |
|
| reply to BF69
Because they have information that is, by their expectations, private being looked at without court oversight which is in violation of all of our rights. |
|
