My point was that 2.1mbps is a fair bit more than the 320kbps needed and that it's done in a 1MHz, not a 20MHz channel. The bit about BT3.0+HS using 802.11 was secondary, in response to skeechan's comment that he'd be interested to learn such a thing.
Count Zero Obama-Biden 2012 Premium join:2007-01-18 Winston Salem, NC
Your point is meaningless because no one uses it.
You know who DOES send full quality audio over wifi? Apple with their wifi based AirPlay standard... And guess what? Companies DO make airplay compatible wireless speakers...
Nobody uses BT2.1+EDR? Uhm... The Bose unit you linked uses it. It's actually quite widely used, if you step outside the Apple store, and it provides plenty of bandwidth for even uncompressed CD quality audio (which requires roughly 1.4mbps).
You're quite likely correct about nobody using BT3.0+HS for audio, but then I never claimed that, did I?
·
·
·
