 pfakPremium
join:2002-12-29
Vancouver, BC | reply to rustydusty
Re: Moving Fee said by rustydusty:Especially if there is services on a specific static and critical services needing to be run on that static. New CMTS, new static(s).
--
The more I C, the less I see. |
|
| Not anymore, given /30 and /29 for static IPs now, they are moved with you. |
|
| said by kevinds:Not anymore, given /30 and /29 for static IPs now, they are moved with you.
Ohhhh rurry?  |
|
1 edit | I wanted two sequencial static IPs, the only way I could get them, was to get a /29 block, because static IPs are /30. And yes, my last move, they moved my static IPs to my new CMTS.
Edit: Actually I just wanted two static IPs in the same subnet, so they would use the same gateway, direct-access wants two sequencial, that was a different project.
--
Yes, I am not employed and looking for IT work. Have passport, will travel. |
|
| reply to pfak
said by pfak:said by rustydusty:Especially if there is services on a specific static and critical services needing to be run on that static. New CMTS, new static(s). Kevin is correct, this is no longer true if you are assigned a static on a /29 or /30 subnet. It is portable to a new CMTS. If your subnet is around a /22 then you might want to ask about getting a /29 or /30. |
|
| Also makes node splits, when the new node is on a different CMTS, there is very little downtime.
--
Yes, I am not employed and looking for IT work. Have passport, will travel. |
|
pfakPremium
join:2002-12-29
Vancouver, BC | said by kevinds:Also makes node splits, when the new node is on a different CMTS, there is very little downtime.
Sweet! Better than the days where my "statics" would get re-numbered every 9 months.
--
The more I C, the less I see. |
|
