dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
5
share rss forum feed

McBane

join:2008-08-22
Plano, TX
reply to ScrawnyB

Re: FiOS - Ethernet Instead of MoCA!

Mine dropped an average of 30ms, it was much more than just maybe 5ms. Maybe it was just he quality of the RG6 at my old apartment when I was on MOCA, but I went from 35ms to my gateway to about 5ms on BPON. Now on GPON at my house I ping my gateway at about 1-2ms.


ScrawnyB

join:2004-05-18
Carlisle, PA
kudos:1

holy crap, lol, well I think you bring up a good point, which means that quality of the coaxial network, including its physical cabling may indeed matter in the latency of the network.

I want to put an asterisk besides your comments, stating "These results are not typical" for the switch from MoCA to Ethernet WAN.



DarkDune

@verizon.net

Wow! Thanks for that FYI. I will post the info once I get Verizon on the phone and they make the change. Obviously they are really busy this weekend.



DarkDune

@verizon.net

Hey!

Livechat is back! For the moment anyhow...

I am chatting with Verizon now about this...will keep you posted!



DarkDune

@verizon.net
reply to DarkDune

Verizon switched it!

Here is that ping difference to the first hop upstream router (note that the gateway IP changed):

Before the switch (from the OP):

C:\Users\username>ping 108.49.145.1 -t

Pinging 108.49.145.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 108.49.145.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.49.145.1: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.49.145.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.49.145.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.49.145.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.49.145.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.49.145.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.49.145.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=125

Ping statistics for 108.49.145.1:
Packets: Sent = 8, Received = 8, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 7ms, Maximum = 12ms, Average = 8ms

After the switch:

C:\Users\username>ping 108.20.201.55 -t

Pinging 108.20.201.55 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 108.20.201.55: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=63
Reply from 108.20.201.55: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=63
Reply from 108.20.201.55: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=63
Reply from 108.20.201.55: bytes=32 time=3ms TTL=63
Reply from 108.20.201.55: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=63
Reply from 108.20.201.55: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=63
Reply from 108.20.201.55: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=63
Reply from 108.20.201.55: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=63
Reply from 108.20.201.55: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=63

Ping statistics for 108.20.201.55:
Packets: Sent = 9, Received = 9, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 1ms, Maximum = 3ms, Average = 1ms

Pretty interesting. So using the Coaxial (note you may need to if you have TV through FiOS) adds almost 7-10 ms to the ping!



birdfeedr
Premium,MVM
join:2001-08-11
Warwick, RI
kudos:9

said by DarkDune :

adds almost 7-10 ms to the ping!

should read "in my sample, 6 to 9, averaging 7ms" since YMMV applies.

Everybody knows a GrammarNazi. I freak out on inaccurate analysis. Sorry. Nice results, any way expressed.


ITALIAN926

join:2003-08-16
kudos:2
reply to DarkDune

Why are you pinging two different servers, then comparing them? Shouldnt you be pinging the SAME destination?


ScrawnyB

join:2004-05-18
Carlisle, PA
kudos:1

His IP (and subsequently, his gateway) changed whenever his connection was switched from moca/coax to ethernet, as a result of the DHCP release/renew process.

Not all of Verizon's IP's are in the same (sequential) IP pool/subnets for one area.



ITALIAN926

join:2003-08-16
kudos:2

Ohhhh I thought he was pinging an outside server, I get it now, thanx



DarkDune

@verizon.net

Have to update my results post, I wasn't pinging my Internet Gateway. Here are the updated results after the switch to Ethernet from MoCA:

Verizon switched it!

Here is that ping difference to the first hop upstream router (note that the gateway IP changed):

Before the switch (from the OP):

C:\Users\username>ping 108.49.145.1 -t

Pinging 108.49.145.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 108.49.145.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.49.145.1: bytes=32 time=12ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.49.145.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.49.145.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.49.145.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.49.145.1: bytes=32 time=9ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.49.145.1: bytes=32 time=10ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.49.145.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=125

Ping statistics for 108.49.145.1:
Packets: Sent = 8, Received = 8, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 7ms, Maximum = 12ms, Average = 8ms

After the switch:

C:\Users\username>ping 108.20.201.1 -t

Pinging 108.20.201.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 108.20.201.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.20.201.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.20.201.1: bytes=32 time=5ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.20.201.1: bytes=32 time=7ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.20.201.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=125
Reply from 108.20.201.1: bytes=32 time=6ms TTL=125

Ping statistics for 108.20.201.1:
Packets: Sent = 6, Received = 6, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 5ms, Maximum = 7ms, Average = 5ms

Pretty interesting. So using the Coaxial (note you may need to if you have TV through FiOS) adds almost 2-5 ms to the ping!