| CNOC Files w/ CRTC Against Rogers Brief: Rogers is doing speed upgrades and now has refused to give these speed upgrades to TPIA customers, which is against the speed match ruling.
CNOC's filing found here (Dated Nov 9th):
»services.crtc.gc.ca/pub/instance···Lang=eng |
|
|
|
 hm
@videotron.ca | CNOC makes reference to some 2006 Speed match policy (»www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2006/···6-77.htm), but wasn't this also ordered in the 2010 speed match fight?
Wasn't there policy created by all the filings from 2009 to 2010? Particularly this one »www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2010/2010-632.htm which was started by cybersurf in 2008 after they went tits up and sold to distributel?
Does the above not apply to cable as well? Seems it does. So why does CNOC reference a 2006 policy instead of a policy most all of it's members were already party to?
Also, instead of starting a new proceeding which will now be delayed, why didn't they file in Rogers new tariffs/speeds that they filed like over a week ago?
/Rant on: F&S I hate the CRTC website. I loose my marbles trying to find stuff and navigating that site. Need a gallon of coffee now after finding that one link above. Hope anonymous nukes them one day just for having an anal website. /rant off
Anyhow, seems this is open for public comment. Who is going to submit their comments? You have till Dec 10th. |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | JF's (Vaxinations) submission to the CRTC.
Haven't read it yet. |
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 | Not JF's best work unfortunately.
I'll probably think of a few things, and file something myself as a consumer.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
 elwoodbluesElwood BluesPremium
join:2006-08-30
HarperLand
 ·Cybersurf Intern..
| said by resa1983:Not JF's best work unfortunately.
I'll probably think of a few things, and file something myself as a consumer.
He tends to be too flippant in his submissions. |
|
 HiVoltPremium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:17 | reply to resa1983
I'm surprised JF is still doing this... |
|
 bbbc
join:2001-10-02
NorthAmerica
kudos:2 | reply to aaah
"In the case of a highly visible Chatham based ISP"
I'm snickering that JF is doing the Lord Voldemort thing in his current submission, "You-Know-Who", "He-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named" or "the Dark Lord".
--
Consumerist.com | Consumers Union |
|
 c2rothPremium
join:2006-04-26
Kitchener, ON
kudos:2 | I also got a laugh out of the 'ISP-who's-name-shall-not-be-named' gambit.
Either way I am happy to see that motions have gone out to rectify the current issue this will have on the competitive landscape for TPIA providers and end users. |
|
HiVoltPremium
join:2000-12-28
Toronto, ON
kudos:17 Reviews:
 ·TekSavvy Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
| said by c2roth:I also got a laugh out of the 'ISP-who's-name-shall-not-be-named' gambit.
LOL... JF's a bright guy, but he holds grudges like no tomorrow...
I remember during one of the hearings where there were audio transcripts, you could really hear him almost stutter where he had to mention TekSavvy by name... LOL
And then there's the grudge against DSLR... Silly wabbit. 
--
|
|
 TOPDAWGPremium
join:2005-04-27
Midland, ON
kudos:3 | hm the hell with his hate for tek and now this site it seems. guy always seemed to be to have a huge ego and think he was more important then he really was. |
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| Peter Nowak did a story about this:
»wordsbynowak.com/2012/11/13/rogers-internet/
I've sent him a tweet asking him about:
"The regulator has responded and is indeed expediting the application. Rogers has been ordered to reply by the end of this week, with a further rebuttal from CNOC due by the end of next week."
Because its not reflected on the Telecom proceedings page.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | reply to elwoodblues
heh his comment on "marketing" made me chuckle.  |
|
resa1983Premium
join:2008-03-10
North York, ON
kudos:7 Reviews:
·TekSavvy Cable
| reply to resa1983
Asked Peter Nowak for the CRTC order, and here it is.
--
Battle.net Tech Support MVP |
|
| reply to TOPDAWG
said by TOPDAWG:hm the hell with his hate for tek and now this site it seems. guy always seemed to be to have a huge ego and think he was more important then he really was.
I doubt there is hate with TSI. More of a show to put distance from them in the eyes of others. Hate doesn't lead to those pictures of Marc, Rocky and JF hugging we always see. And who really cares if he really does dislike them? Does that bug you that someone doesn't like teksavvy? Seems to me you're a little over sensitive with your love for them. Meanwhile (and to inject a bit of reality here), he steps up to the plate for everyone, unlike the you who is ragging on him. You seem jealous of him. But if you can do a better job, I invite you to step up and do it... Otherwise... well, you know... |
|
bt
join:2009-02-26
canada
kudos:1 | reply to resa1983
Somehow, I get the feeling that CNOC won't be waiting until the 23rd to file their response. |
|
| reply to elwoodblues
said by elwoodblues:said by resa1983:Not JF's best work unfortunately.
I'll probably think of a few things, and file something myself as a consumer.
He tends to be too flippant in his submissions. It's perfectly adequate for the issue at-hand.
If Blais' "consumer focus" is to be believed, then JF's submission presents the matter in a very consumer-like manner that even Pentefountas should be able to understand. |
|
 dillyhammerA. Good. Start.Premium,MVM
join:2010-01-09
Hamilton, ON
kudos:9
·Start Communicat..
·Cogeco Cable
·TekSavvy DSL
·Caneris
1 edit | reply to TOPDAWG
said by TOPDAWG:hm the hell with his hate for tek and now this site it seems. guy always seemed to be to have a huge ego and think he was more important then he really was.
This so-called hate it nothing but forum conjecture and speculation fueled by the same sort of mentality that causes people to slow down at accident scenes hoping to get a glimpse of bodies 'n' guts 'n' gore.
I personally find his ego pretty much commensurate with his abilities and intellect, and of his importance in the grand telecom regulatory bullshit scheme of things there can be no dispute. He's had an impact, done a lot, and obviously intends to do more.
You could just, you know, break down and thank him.
Mike
--
Cogeco - The New UBB Devil -»[Burloak] Usage Based Billing Nightmare
Cogeco UBB, No Modem Required - »[Niagara] 40gb of "usage" while the modem is unplugged |
|
hm
@videotron.ca | reply to MaynardKrebs
This is all a game anyhow since Rogers knows the upcoming wholesale costing revision is going to lead to price changes.
Also makes me wonder how many people would need to upgrade to a doc-3 modem? Out of that, how many are new to TPIA providers and just bought their doc-2 modem which is now no good? Will resellers swap them out with just a price difference for these new customers?
Is there anyone here that would have to swap modems? |
|
| reply to aaah
In case anyone is trying to find what Rogers submitted to the CRTC that got this going, it can be found here:
»www.crtc.gc.ca/8740/eng/2012/r28.htm
(#'s 28, 29, & 30) |
|
| reply to aaah
Some people that think JF has an ego have forgotten that his filling to the office of Tony Clement got a lot of media coverage and a lot of attention and woke a few people up.
Ego or not, he has helped a lot period. no ifs or buts. |
|
