dslreports logo
site
 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery
spc

spacer




how-to block ads


Search Topic:
uniqs
2443
share rss forum feed


motorola870

join:2008-12-07
Arlington, TX
kudos:3

upstream bonding/ 5 or more downstream thread.

post in this thread if you have upstream bonding or have more than 4 Downstream channels present on you modem. Also can you post what city you are in?

Here is mine:

Dallas Texas system cluster (Arlington Texas)

Downstream Bonded Channels
Channel Lock Status Modulation Channel ID Frequency Power SNR Correctables Uncorrectables
1 Locked QAM256 1 783000000 Hz -2.7 dBmV 37.2 dB 33 0
2 Locked QAM256 2 789000000 Hz -2.8 dBmV 37.1 dB 73 0
3 Locked QAM256 3 795000000 Hz -3.4 dBmV 36.4 dB 197 0
4 Locked QAM256 4 801000000 Hz -3.4 dBmV 36.2 dB 357 0
5 Locked QAM256 5 807000000 Hz -4.2 dBmV 35.4 dB 924 24
6 Locked QAM256 6 813000000 Hz -3.7 dBmV 36.5 dB 327 0
7 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV 0.0 dB 0 0
8 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV 0.0 dB 0 0

Upstream Bonded Channels
Channel Lock Status US Channel Type Channel ID Symbol Rate Frequency Power
1 Locked TDMA and ATDMA 10 2560 Ksym/sec 33000000 Hz 41.2 dBmV
2 Locked TDMA and ATDMA 9 2560 Ksym/sec 36500000 Hz 41.2 dBmV
3 Locked TDMA and ATDMA 11 2560 Ksym/sec 29500000 Hz 41.2 dBmV
4 Locked TDMA and ATDMA 12 2560 Ksym/sec 24500000 Hz 41.2 dBmV

delar

join:2004-04-20
Honolulu, HI

Upstream bonding with 30/5 service in Honolulu.

Downstream Bonded Channels
Channel Lock Status Modulation Channel ID Frequency Power SNR Correctables Uncorrectables
1 Locked QAM256 3 591000000 Hz 6.1 dBmV 36.3 dB 0 0
2 Locked QAM256 1 603000000 Hz 6.7 dBmV 36.1 dB 0 0
3 Locked QAM256 2 597000000 Hz 7.0 dBmV 36.2 dB 0 0
4 Locked QAM256 4 585000000 Hz 7.0 dBmV 36.7 dB 0 0
5 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV 0.0 dB 0 0
6 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV 0.0 dB 0 0
7 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV 0.0 dB 0 0
8 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV 0.0 dB 0 0

Upstream Bonded Channels
Channel Lock Status US Channel Type Channel ID Symbol Rate Frequency Power
1 Locked ATDMA 5 5120 Ksym/sec 29100000 Hz 43.2 dBmV
2 Locked TDMA 6 2560 Ksym/sec 20975000 Hz 43.2 dBmV
3 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Ksym/sec 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV
4 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Ksym/sec 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV



pizz
bye bye twc. hello Comcast.
Premium
join:2000-10-27
Astoria, NY
Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable
reply to motorola870

Astoria, Queens New York City

Downstream 1 6 339.00 MHz 8.48 dBmV 37.36 dB 256QAM 977823713 907 0
Downstream 2 1 297.00 MHz 8.74 dBmV 38.26 dB 256QAM 644800537 7 0
Downstream 3 2 303.00 MHz 8.69 dBmV 38.26 dB 256QAM 568085424 70 0
Downstream 4 3 309.00 MHz 8.78 dBmV 38.26 dB 256QAM 558229105 7 0
Downstream 5 4 315.00 MHz 7.71 dBmV 38.26 dB 256QAM 620427394 77 1003
Downstream 6 5 333.00 MHz 7.93 dBmV 38.26 dB 256QAM 609208682 113 1055

Upstream 1 6 23.80 MHz 40.75 dBmV DOCSIS2.0 (ATDMA) 5120 kSym/s 16QAM
Upstream 2 5 19.00 MHz 40.25 dBmV DOCSIS1.x (TDMA) 2560 kSym/s 16QAM
Upstream 3 7 30.60 MHz 41.50 dBmV DOCSIS2.0 (ATDMA) 5120 kSym/s 16QAM
Upstream 4 8 38.80 MHz 41.75 dBmV DOCSIS1.x (TDMA) 2560 kSym/s 16QAM
--
It's ok to say, 'I don't know'. It's even better when someone takes the time to explain what you, 'don't know'.



Nick21

join:2010-02-03
New York, NY
reply to motorola870

Upper East Side Manhattan 50/5

Downstream Bonded Channels
Channel Lock Status Modulation Channel ID Frequency Power SNR Correctables Uncorrectables
1 Locked QAM256 6 339000000 Hz -0.1 dBmV 39.5 dB 0 0
2 Locked QAM256 1 297000000 Hz -0.3 dBmV 39.3 dB 0 0
3 Locked QAM256 2 303000000 Hz -0.3 dBmV 40.3 dB 0 0
4 Locked QAM256 3 309000000 Hz -0.8 dBmV 39.9 dB 0 0
5 Locked QAM256 4 315000000 Hz -0.4 dBmV 40.8 dB 0 0
6 Locked QAM256 5 333000000 Hz -0.9 dBmV 40.5 dB 0 0
7 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV 0.0 dB 0 0
8 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV 0.0 dB 0 0

Upstream Bonded Channels
Channel Lock Status US Channel Type Channel ID Symbol Rate Frequency Power
1 Locked TDMA 8 2560 Ksym/sec 38800000 Hz 47.4 dBmV
2 Locked TDMA 5 2560 Ksym/sec 19000000 Hz 47.4 dBmV
3 Locked ATDMA 6 5120 Ksym/sec 23800000 Hz 47.4 dBmV
4 Locked ATDMA 7 5120 Ksym/sec 30600000 Hz 47.4 dBmV


VanNuysBear

join:2005-06-14
Panorama City, CA
reply to motorola870

Los Angeles, CA (San Fernando Valley) 30/5

Downstream Bonded Channels
Channel Lock Status Modulation Channel ID Frequency Power SNR Correctables Uncorrectables
1 Locked QAM256 7 669000000 Hz 1.8 dBmV 40.2 dB 1 0
2 Locked QAM256 1 705000000 Hz 1.5 dBmV 39.5 dB 0 0
3 Locked QAM256 2 699000000 Hz 1.8 dBmV 39.4 dB 0 0
4 Locked QAM256 3 693000000 Hz 1.2 dBmV 39.8 dB 1 0
5 Locked QAM256 4 687000000 Hz 1.3 dBmV 39.9 dB 1 0
6 Locked QAM256 5 681000000 Hz 1.6 dBmV 39.9 dB 0 0
7 Locked QAM256 6 675000000 Hz 1.7 dBmV 40.3 dB 2 0
8 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV 0.0 dB 0 0

Upstream Bonded Channels
Channel Lock Status US Channel Type Channel ID Symbol Rate Frequency Power
1 Locked TDMA 2 2560 Ksym/sec 18500000 Hz 42.7 dBmV
2 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Ksym/sec 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV
3 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Ksym/sec 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV
4 Not Locked Unknown 0 0 Ksym/sec 0 Hz 0.0 dBmV


mckenna797
Premium
join:2004-08-25
Astoria, NY

Astoria NYC
Cable Modem Downstream
DS-1 DS-2 DS-3 DS-4
315000000 297000000 303000000 309000000

DS-5 DS-6 DS-7 DS-8
333000000 339000000



juilinsandar
Texas Gooner
Premium
join:2000-07-17
San Benito, TX
reply to motorola870

4 down and 1 up.


gia

join:2008-01-30
Mcallen, TX
reply to motorola870

Click for full size
McAllen, TX; 78501

Downstream

1. 555000000 Hz QAM256
2. 561000000 Hz QAM256
3. 567000000 Hz QAM256
4. 573000000 Hz QAM256

Upstream

1. 34000000 Hz sometimes 29000000 Hz

kc6108

join:2012-07-20
Kansas City, MO

Downstream

DCID Freq Power SNR Modulation Octets Correcteds Uncorrectables
Downstream 1 8 663.00 MHz 1.77 dBmV 36.61 dB 256QAM 66328208469 761 0
Downstream 2 1 621.00 MHz 4.07 dBmV 36.61 dB 256QAM 56950812463 404 0
Downstream 3 2 627.00 MHz 3.75 dBmV 37.09 dB 256QAM 74731523020 138 0
Downstream 4 3 633.00 MHz 4.14 dBmV 37.09 dB 256QAM 73535779390 86 0
Downstream 5 4 639.00 MHz 3.64 dBmV 35.97 dB 256QAM 73236981823 2678 0
Downstream 6 5 645.00 MHz 2.97 dBmV 36.17 dB 256QAM 68969596961 2716 0
Downstream 7 6 651.00 MHz 1.87 dBmV 36.17 dB 256QAM 67190459283 2684 0
Downstream 8 7 657.00 MHz 1.57 dBmV 36.17 dB 256QAM 67113053345 2630 0

Upstream

UCID Freq Power Channel Type Symbol Rate Modulation
Upstream 1 18 32.20 MHz 33.00 dBmV DOCSIS1.x (TDMA) 2560 kSym/s 16QAM

Kansas City, MO

kc6108

join:2012-07-20
Kansas City, MO

2 edits

1 recommendation

reply to motorola870

BTW, I received an email from TW stating I was just upgraded from 30/5 to 50/5 for free. I live up North so Google Fiber hasn't reached my neighborhood yet.

»corp-mail.timewarnercable.com/Po···EME.aspx


kc6108

join:2012-07-20
Kansas City, MO

1 edit
reply to motorola870

Click for full size
 
Our speedtests fluctuate from ~30 Mbps to ~58 Mbps using TW's speedtest site. »speedtest.peakview.rr.com/ Today is a slow day for some reason.

Using speedtest.net we always achieve lower numbers.

»www.speedtest.net/result/2407282783.png

FYI, we have a small business router (Cisco SA540) with Trend Micro ProtectLink Web functionality enabled. Thus all of our web traffic is funneled through Trend Micro. It does not slow down our Internet speeds at all, but it does cause high ping test results, as well as, lower speed test results.

We consistently achieve ~58000 Kbps (or ~7.1 MB/s) download speeds in real life. We rely heavily on VPN (over SSL). Even will all the overhead we always achieve ~55500 Kbps (or ~6.8 MB/s) download throughput. Uploading fluctuates more, but settles down around 5000+ Kbps after a while though.


Nick21

join:2010-02-03
New York, NY
reply to motorola870

kc, you should delete everything after aspx in the link because it reveals your email at the bottom since you posted a personalized link. Anyway I found the Ultimate email offer too.

»corp-mail.timewarnercable.com/Po···ATE.aspx reveals 50/5 to 100/5

»corp-mail.timewarnercable.com/Po···RBO.aspx reveals 20/2 to 30/5

They really need to bump upload already. 100/5 is ridiculous.



motorola870

join:2008-12-07
Arlington, TX
kudos:3

said by Nick21:

kc, you should delete everything after aspx in the link because it reveals your email at the bottom since you posted a personalized link. Anyway I found the Ultimate email offer too.

»corp-mail.timewarnercable.com/Po···ATE.aspx reveals 50/5 to 100/5

»corp-mail.timewarnercable.com/Po···RBO.aspx reveals 20/2 to 30/5

They really need to bump upload already. 100/5 is ridiculous.

you have to remember Kansas City is not 100% bonding on the upstream yet so they can't rollout the faster uploads yet. Dallas or NYC could do it now but Dallas could only probably do 10Mbps on extreme and 15Mbps on ultimate as we only have 4 upstreams with a max of 15Mbps per upstream right now with QAM64 so they will have to respace the upstreams to get in more upstream bandwidth if they are in fact going to do 100/25 for ultimate after they get 8 down and 4 up going my area.


Nick21

join:2010-02-03
New York, NY

I posted my NYC info above, how much upstream could they launch based on my info? Just curious and thanks for the insight.



motorola870

join:2008-12-07
Arlington, TX
kudos:3

said by Nick21:

I posted my NYC info above, how much upstream could they launch based on my info? Just curious and thanks for the insight.

I really don't know but I have seen conflicting reports from NYC showing QAM64 and QAM16 and others showing QAM16 only so there are 2 TDMA channels at 3.2MHz wide which would be 20Mbps (18Mbps net) and 6.4MHz wide ATDMA at QAM16 would be 20Mbps a piece so total of 40Mbps there and if QAM64 60Mbps total there along with the 18Mbps would be 58Mbps or 78Mbps depending on the modulation.

My node has 15Mbps per channel 3.2MHz wide at QAM64 *4= 60Mbps total.


mackey
Premium
join:2007-08-20
kudos:8
reply to VanNuysBear

said by VanNuysBear:

Los Angeles, CA (San Fernando Valley) 30/5

I'm also in the valley with 30/5 but we still only have 4 down 1 up

/M


motorola870

join:2008-12-07
Arlington, TX
kudos:3

said by mackey:

said by VanNuysBear:

Los Angeles, CA (San Fernando Valley) 30/5

I'm also in the valley with 30/5 but we still only have 4 down 1 up

/M

this rollout is similar to the original DOCSIS 3.0 rollout they have to make changes to each CMTS so it takes time. My area (North Texas system which consists of about 60 hubs) took 3 weeks to go from 4 down 1 up to 6 down 1 up and then upstream bonding was just activated one day I saw here at broadband reports someone in North Texas had upstream bonding so I reset my modem and I did as well and TWC later did a reboot of all modems so everyone got upstream bonding activated. TWC actually got the upgrades to 6 down 1 up in my area finished earlier than expected and I believe it had something to do with the olympics and since the upgrades were done for three consecutive weeks in July of 2012 they were trying to get the upgrades done before the olympics started as people were using the internet for watching the olympics.


bluepoint

join:2001-03-24
reply to motorola870

said by motorola870:

you have to remember Kansas City is not 100% bonding on the upstream yet so they can't rollout the faster uploads yet.

Do you really think TWC will update KC's clunker upload speeds? Probably you're correct it doesn't make sense to bond upload channels if they're not going to use it, however, they have a reputation of not caring about the upload speeds so the question is, for how long?


motorola870

join:2008-12-07
Arlington, TX
kudos:3

said by bluepoint:

said by motorola870:

you have to remember Kansas City is not 100% bonding on the upstream yet so they can't rollout the faster uploads yet.

Do you really think TWC will update KC's clunker upload speeds? Probably you're correct it doesn't make sense to bond upload channels if they're not going to use it, however, they have a reputation of not caring about the upload speeds so the question is, for how long?

I did not say that! I meant is not possible to upgrade the upload speeds if they have not rolled out upstream bonding. kg who is a member here at broadband reports says that parts of Kansas City already have upstream bonding they are just waiting on the rest of the area to have upstream bonding enabled to offer the faster uploads.

Also TWC is expanding upstream bonding to markets where they don't have major competition such as Hawaii, and Columbus OH.

digital808

join:2007-07-28
Mililani, HI

I hope Oceanic Cable here in Hawaii increases their upload speeds soon! Local competitor is offering 10Mbps upload speeds along with 50Mbps downloads! I'm also hearing that local competitor is slowly testing fiber to premises in certain areas!



djrobx
Premium
join:2000-05-31
Valencia, CA
kudos:2
Reviews:
·Time Warner Cable
·VOIPO
reply to bluepoint

Probably you're correct it doesn't make sense to bond upload channels if they're not going to use it

Bonded upstreams would help heavily congested areas, even if they weren't planning on increasing the caps. They currently use DCC (dynamic channel change requests) to balance unbonded upstreams, and I've noticed a lot of posts from people having problems with disconnections caused by it. It seems silly to use DCC when a D3 modem is capable of bonding.

TW's 5mbps is a lot more than I can get from their competitor in my area. The best AT&T offers me is 3mbps.

--
AT&T U-Hearse - RIP Unlimited Internet 1995-2011
Rethink Billable.

mdpeterman

join:2010-10-10
Westerville, OH
reply to motorola870

Why is Columbus a no competition market? I have TWC, WOW and AT&T U-verse all available at my house. TWC and WOW are tied right now with 50/5 offering, even though WOW is a few $ cheaper per month. Wish TWC would upgrade the area to 100+. AT&T U-verse is of course no competition with their 24/3 max.



bluepoint

join:2001-03-24
reply to djrobx

said by djrobx:

TW's 5mbps is a lot more than I can get from their competitor in my area. The best AT&T offers me is 3mbps.

KC's google offers 1Gbps upload, in my area the competition's slowest upload offerings is 10Mbps. It seems TWC thinks Upload speed is not that important, let's see if they don't get caught with their pants down again.