funny - please, read the legal filings before replying to any of my comments.
Unauthorized reproduction = alleged infringement
a declaration that the Defendants unauthorized reproduction and distribution of the Plaintiffs Copyrighted cinematographic Works, listed in Schedule A (the Works), constitutes an infringement of the rights contrary to sections 27(1) and 27(2) of the Copyright ACI;
distribution = uploading
And Atticka: You are partially correct in that part of their statement of claim alludes to damages for commercial infringement. This can be viewed in a couple ways 1) They are covering their bases 2) They intend to make a case for P2P = commercial infringement
The latter would be really hard to do since there's no monetary gain in P2P. The thrust of their statement of claim is about the damages incurred due to the distribution of their works. If they made their case on the downloading of a film the most they would likely get is $100 + costs. By making it about uploading (distribution) they are trying to maximize their potential return to be closer to the $5,000 + costs.