said by rednekcowboy: said by TSI Marc:
just reading at the link you provided.. seems to me that's in total. not per IP.
I find it amusing how, out of this whole thread and the other one, that this is what you chose to comment on......
While I am happy that you are at least growing somewhat of a backbone, I have a sneaky feeling that had more to do with CIPPIC stepping in than anything else.
Your reputation has taken a serious nose-dive, IMHO. To let a motion for a court order for your customers private data go unopposed and only fight on what you feel you should be paid for selling out their privacy (something that you are legally bound to defend) is extremely disheartening. Then, to top it off, you come on here and the only comment you make is about price per IP.
I'm not your customer (thank god) but you have some serious explaining to do to your customers. AND don't try and spin this off as a piracy debate with me should you chose to reply as we all know that is complete BS. At this stage we are talking PRIVACY, not piracy and you most definitely have an obligation to fight for that, not how much you can sell it for.
pfft! fuddle duddle.
You have no idea how much backbone this has all taken. Once it's over. You can bet your ass I will explain.--
Marc - CEO/TekSavvy